melvaughn

I met Adriana in New York out on the street last summer. I stopped and asked for an autograph so we were standing side by side. I'm 5'10 in my bare feet. We were both wearing flat flip-flop style sandals and I was a good two inches taller than her. She was closer to 5'8". The statistics on her height are not accurate. At first I always thought she was 5'10" as well but now when I see photos of her in her bare feet, I can tell she is not all that tall. She is definetly 5'10" in her heels though which I guess is what counts. A good way to tell someone's height is to look at how long their arms are. Adriana's arms aren't all that long. She's probably standing on a platform/ledge in her photo with Hana.

I think she looks pretty stick-thin in that dress actually. How skinny does she have to be, for people to finally realize she isn't fat or gaining weight. She has always had a round face even when she was very young. Her hair-style just draws attention to the face. If someone were to compare, two side by side VS pic...one from 2001 and one from 2007, there would hardly be a noticeable difference in her weight. She's about as equally skinny.

Is it just me or do her lips look really thin in those pics. I don't think I've ever seen her lips look so skinny before. They still look good, but far from the plump look they normally have.

Playboy's mentioned in the Bible? I must have missed that passage in confirmation classes. But I can easily imagine a devout Christian posing for the mag, because whatever woman it is might not see it as a sin, seeing it instead as a celebration of her body. (Disclaimer: This is not meant to start an argument!) Yes pornography is mentioned everywhere in the bible as a sin....as is 'looking with lust' at naked women. The bible doesn't have to say the word 'playboy' for it to be considered pornography. Again, if a person poses for playboy..they aren't being very 'devout', more like a hypocrite. To be devout, you have to actually 'follow' your religion otherwize you aren't being very devout. You can't call yourself a 'devout Christian' if your lifestyle doesn't reflect that. I highly doubt anyone whose religion actually 'means' something personal to them, would pose for playboy. Simply 'calling' yourself devout and then actually 'being' devout by your actions are two VERY different things. It's like saying there are many devout Christian porn-stars. It's a hypocracy/contradiction to what you believe in. The two don't usually go hand-in-hand.

Well, that's a bit of an oxymoron. They wouldn't be too 'devout' if they're posing for playboy now would they. You can only call someone 'devout' if they follow the rules of their religion. Posing for playboy is secular/sinful according to the bible therefore they are probably Christian by 'name' only. Their religion means nothing to them. And I highly doubt too many muslims pose for playboy either LOL

I don't care if she's a virgin or not. I was simply making the interesting observation that Lenny, who doesn't seem the type to marry anyone, proposed to her in a matter of weeks. Seems suspicious. If he was getting 'free sex' why would he want to get married? And this is probably why they broke up so quickly as well. Again, if he were getting free sex, it probably would have lasted a lot longer.

It sounds suspiciously like another 'fake article' in a magazine. As for Lenny Kravitz, he also doesn't seem like the 'marrying type" yet they were engaged pretty fast. That is partly suspicious as well. Why in the world would Lenny propose if it wasn't because he was desperate for sex?

I still don't see how Adriana can be considered 'cuvy' Maybe our standards of thin have become so drastic, that now women like Adriana are called curvy. I think Adriana is still extremely thin and would look even more so in person. Curvy to me is Scarlette Johansen or Beyonce. When I think of Adriana's body, I still think 'thin modelsque' I know many guys who prefer 'bigger' women (more to grab) kind of thing than skinny. I think most guys would be more attracted to an overweight women than an underweight one...at least in terms of sex, otherwize it would be like taking a skelton to bed. Anyway, Adriana isn't a straight up and down tooth pick, but I wouldn't call her curvy either. For the average women, she is very skinny. Her BMI would be well below average (bordering on under weight even) The camera adds ten pounds as well. I know many people who still consider her to be 'too skinny'.

Her legs look different. If that were Adriana her legs would be a lot longer. That model has slightly shorter legs and they aren't as thin either. Adriana's legs are longer from the knee to the ankle and a bit thinner.

Adriana really can't get any thinner. She's pretty skinny in those pictures. Besides if you're too thin, and not toned, your legs can look like 'sticks' in leggings. Not attractive at all. I wouldn't want to see Adriana any thinner than what she already is.

I agree. This is definetly her rebound fling. It will be interesting to see how long it lasts.

It's just the angle of the photo. If she were really 'bigger' she'd look big in every photo. Her stomach looks iron board flat in the other photos where she's facing the front.

Of course it is. It looks exactly like her. I've seen the photo posted many times, including on here.

I have definitely never seen that one before.

In the nude photos her body does look the most natural and realistic to how many women look though, whether people like them or not. At least she isn't all air-brushed, with a push-up bra and looking like 'the fantasy women'. The Victoria secret look is only an 'image' It's not really realistic. I like the black and white photos because she doesn't look perfect. Her boobs are small...if you look close, her breasts are not symmetrical. One is slightly smaller. I think it makes her more 'relatable and real' actually. (although she's definetly way too skinny in the photos)

I saw a nude photo also posted on another site, but you could literally see EVERYTHING down there. It wasn't the glass tube shots. That would have been tamn compared to this shot. I'm pretty sure it was fake as it was right up there with porn. I'll post the link if I can remember where I saw it.

Hmmm I didn't know that she ''lied'' about this... Bellazon is my main source Is this 100% real or not? If she did, it's not very smart of her... I mean you say you have certain commitments and then it becomes apparent that you've broken them. Why should she do that?.... SO She admitted to lying about it in another magazine interview. She said her publicist put pressure on her to lie or something like that! I hope I didn't just ruin it for you now too.. It's all been talked about on here already. Most members here already know she lied.

Does anyone think Adriana may have lost some fans when it was discovered she lied about her virginity? I remember there use to be some people (one guy in particular) that were always posting here, so excited that she was actually a virgin. I won't mention names, but they seemed like huge fans. Well I haven't seen them here since she came-out about not being a virgin. I wonder how many people were so disappointed over that, they're no longer fans....

Those all look like fan photos as though they approached for her autograph and she's posing with them.

Darker hair suits her better...but I hope she doesn't get thinner. I love her body and face like this. I agree. It would be great if she had dark hair again, but she doesn't need to be thinner. Her body looks perfect now. Much more sexy. I cringe when I see her anorexic run-way photos from way back where she had the chicken legs. Now her body looks more appealing to men.

she looks pretty but she doesn't look so in the morning I don't know, but I think she still does Those photos weren't actually taken in the morning. It's just a commercial of her pretending to 'wake-up in the morning. She has stylists/make-up artists touching up her face and hair constantly. Who knows what she looks like in the morning. I love the fan photos. You can tell a fan took them. I have real photos I took of Petra Nemcova that look similar.

Wow, those are awsome. I had no idea so many photos existed. The second pic of her with the high ponytail on top of her head was the one I was looking for...thanks!

I remember seeing a candid photo of Ana when she was only 4 or 5 years old. It was on a fake myspace profile and she looked soooo cute. Does anyone have it to post???? Thanks. If not, I'll see if I can find it.

I think the youngest pics of her are the ones when she first started to model for Guess that most people have already seen. Nothing that exciting. Too bad. I know Alessandra and Ana both had baby photos.

People have asked this before but I don't think any pictures of Adriana as a kid exist. I saw an adorable picture of Ana Beatriz when she was four years old once on a myspace profile. I don't think there are any pics of Adriana as a child though.