snmkytkn

Thanks a lot:)

We are very very lucky to have you here and to know you. Sooo many thanks Kukim.

I have never ever seen taht Escada before, many many thanks KUKIMMMM...

She can be Renee, but you're the expert on her. Was her hair short in 1984? And the girl behind the mask isn't Renee, I think. I have that picture and many many times I examined the picture to guess the model...But I was not successful until now. Big lol, because I suspected that she was Ashley Richardson for a long while :D

Very beautiful and rare. Thanks for posting MissParker.

very lovely. Thanks Kukim.Hugs.

Mmmmmm ....great catwalk picture. Thanks Korravai.

Lovely, lovely pics. Thanks a lot Kukim.

I am really happy that you liked the pics. I didn't know who she was back in the 90s. She was just a very beautiful model with no name. I want to thank you for giving a name to her images.

Heather Stewart-Whyte and Christy^^^^

My scans from french Elle, unknown date.

The last one.

Close ups of her beautiful face.

Especially for Korravai. My scans from Maxmara magazine, winter 1993. Be quick I will delete them soon.

My big thanks go to Missivana for scanning all those great pics.

Tatjana's cover .

How can I ever thank you enough Paradoxa and Fashie? Thanks sooo much.

This is a great topic. thanks for starting it.

very very beautiful scans. Thanks alot friends.

This editorial is really great, like a fairy tale or a costume drama. Thanks a lot.

Thanks for the new scans PhilA.

They are really interesting pictures but, the price is really high.

Well, the people who do nothing to contribute, prepare the end of the threads. Less and less people want to scan and post after they have experiences like this.

Has really no one an opinion about this? I´m sad I´m only getting a reply or "thanks" when I´ve posted scans, but when I ask a question there´s big silence around. I really have no idea about why there is ".jpg" is printed at the back of the photo. Perhaps the seller "sends" the negative to the kodak lab by e-mail (but then there wouldn't be a negative)...Did you try to contact the seller about this and complain about the low quality of the picture? But he says "the reprint are sent to develop to kodak laboratories" and could be meaning that he has printed something from his negative and then sent it to kodak to get yet another re-reprint. His words aren't very clear I am afraid.

My scans from 1987.