Jump to content

calwatch

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. calwatch posted a post in a topic in MODEL ID [help]
    I think what you have to do is get the full size photos and check the skin. Even with their extensive photoshopping and removing of tattoos, AI skin looks much more smoothed than natural.
  2. shaq_a started following calwatch
  3. calwatch posted a post in a topic in MODEL ID [help]
    I'm pretty sure this woman isn't AI. 1.
  4. Recent Venus (from the model ID thread via TheIndustrialist)
  5. calwatch posted a post in a topic in MODEL ID [help]
    The fingers are always slightly off, which is my giveaway. Venus has experimented with AI models before, the other giveaway is that they are all one offs and you never see them again (although you will have to download a lot to figure this out.)
  6. Veronika has actually come up with a doctor's proof that she doesn't have implants, in response to questions. So she wouldn't count. I also don't think Gigi is enhanced, unless she took them out at some point. That is going to be tough, though. You have the Maddy Cheary's of the world with those back pain boobs but while a glamour model is not in the same category that you are looking for. Others might be Polina Sitnova (Polina Aura) and Joy Corrigan, although both of their back pain boobs were removed recently (and Joy's were not that large to begin with, although clearly set off from her Kate Moss-type frame).
  7. calwatch posted a post in a topic in General Discussion
    The Villas Boas sisters, Diana and Simone Liz and MK (Mary Kate) Rankey