August 29, 20222 yr On 8/27/2022 at 7:31 PM, bobkater said: Is this Edita? Censored nudity Hide contents The photo is from my personal collection, and to get there it means that it was mentioned as being her where I found it, which I can’t remember. But looking at it again now, I’m not so sure it’s Edita. What do the experts say? I’ve enhanced the photo anyway, hoping it’s her, so if it’s not, it will be a shame. If it is her, it will be a bigger shame that it’s censored. If it is Edita, can someone come up with the uncensored version? The essence of womanhood.
August 29, 20222 yr Warning – Nudity Spoiler Another one for the detectives. The low resolution version on the left is the only one I could find. It will be very nice if someone posts a higher quality. In the meantime, I’ve magnified this x4 (on the right). The artistically colorized version below is provided for amusement purposes only and is not intended for serious collectors.
August 30, 20222 yr 17 hours ago, bobkater said: Another one for the detectives. The low resolution version on the left is the only one I could find. It will be very nice if someone posts a higher quality. Still pretty low resolution, but this is the best I could find: https://www.bellazon.com/main/topic/7978-edita-vilkeviciute/?do=findComment&comment=4109353
August 30, 20222 yr You’ve done it again elef, it’s higher resolution than the one I posted, so it’s a good find. The search is still on for the full photo, as opposed to the collage, that should have highest resolution. Warning – Nudity Spoiler As the new version has higher resolution than the old one, its enhancement also has higher resolution and definition. Collectors are advised to do the substitution. New version on the left, its enhancement on the right.
August 31, 20222 yr Warning – Nudity Spoiler Source: Visualizing,fashion Here are three more pics from the same collage. https://www.bellazon.com/main/uploads/monthly_08_2016/post-93571-0-1593836636-03351.jpg On the left, losslessly cut out to prevent quality loss. On the right, enhanced and magnified x2. Wanted: The full photos with max resolution and quality.
September 1, 20222 yr Warning – Nudity Spoiler This photo, posted above, suffers from severe grain. Cleared and magnified.
September 2, 20222 yr Warning – Nudity Spoiler 25 Magazine video cap. Brought in to focus and magnified on the right. The odd color streaks and other artifacts are part of the image and so they are also enhanced. Removing them (by retouching) would falsify the image. They should thus be accepted as giving the picture its peculiar character, as intended by its creator.
September 2, 20222 yr Upscaled photos of Edita at St Barth April-3-2014 Warning nudity https://postimg.cc/gallery/mC1LkPH
September 5, 20222 yr On 9/3/2022 at 12:13 AM, bobkater said: Warning – Nudity Hide contents 25 Magazine video cap. Brought in to focus and magnified on the right. The odd color streaks and other artifacts are part of the image and so they are also enhanced. Removing them (by retouching) would falsify the image. They should thus be accepted as giving the picture its peculiar character, as intended by its creator. Love your artwork！
September 5, 20222 yr Warning – Nudity Spoiler Vogue Australia The full photo has a fairly high resolution. The problem is, Edita’s part is very small, and if it is isolated for better visibility (on the left), resolution and definition are necessarily poor. So we increase both these parameters on the right. I clarify that enhancement is not mere upscaling, as it also increases quality as well as resolution. For example, the enhanced image on the right has better definition even at its larger size than the original at its smaller size.
September 6, 20222 yr Another annoying censorship – the uncensored original sought Apart from the silly censorship, the image also suffers from serious noise. The noise can be fixed, on the right, but nothing can be done about the censorship. Only the uncensored version can fix that. For fun only, not intended for purists, this colorization.
September 7, 20222 yr If the new beta version of photoshop or other has been used for the upscaling it alters the face so much that Edita is not recognized at all.
September 7, 20222 yr ˄ ˄ ˄ To me, the face on the right looks exactly the same as the original on the left. The only difference is better definition/less noise. So if there is a deviation from the expected Edita's face, it's already in the original. The enhancement can't and shouldn't change that.
September 7, 20222 yr I can only agree with saber. The AI image enhancers sometimes change the face too much. People's faces sometimes look like those of wax figures or of an oil painting. Sometimes there are quite good results, but very often it is rather the uncanny valley effect. What is the AI? BaseTen from GFP-GAN?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.