Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

8 hours ago, neurovibe said:

This allows to view the output (after the json query) and there you have a URL you can drag into a new tab.

Checked this and it only gives a low res link, this really sucks

33 minutes ago, Charlie's Alter Ego said:

Will do. Got my account back in the meantime..


Thanks! And awesome!
 

3 hours ago, wndmkr said:

Checked this and it only gives a low res link, this really sucks


I get 2000px res'. Ideally we'd get that extra 48px though. Check this one out:

This image (known 2048px): https://500px.com/photo/284061713/anastasiya-by-chris-bos

Link:

Spoiler

v2?sig=a85a395d9581d38aa185cadbfb7482c69


https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/284061713/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?sig=a85a395d9581d38aa185cadbfb7482c694cdb1fba54c3e91692dea7720507f0d

 


Changing m= (m3%d) 2048 won't work though, neither the quality (q) setting

UPDATE:
No longer need to do that "right click" and selection source, just do view source. Ctrl+F this: og:image
The 1st one (at least for now) is a meta tag containing that same URL. So meanwhile we have that I guess

I remember tumblr limiting upload size and downsizing every single image that has been uploaded prior to their update, maybe 500px did something similar and 2000 pixel is now the maximum width. :idk:

3 hours ago, neurovibe said:

UPDATE:
No longer need to do that "right click" and selection source, just do view source. Ctrl+F this: og:image
The 1st one (at least for now) is a meta tag containing that same URL. So meanwhile we have that I guess

That works on non nude posts but not on nudes

23 minutes ago, wndmkr said:

That works on non nude posts but not on nudes

 

Hm. And you're signed in? 

That sucks.

BTW, it's a shame I can't work on this right now, but if ever anyone of you guys or a guest reading this knows how to code, the json format file called which contains the URL (including for nudes, I tested) is sent through the http requests, so that's a good place to start :)

Edited by neurovibe
http requests is what I meant, not headers

Ph.: Grégory Fountoussov  for: Couture de Nuit • Date: Posted July 19 2019 • Source: their IG   Res.: 1080

aqAFRGcw_t.jpg

 

It seems like 500px now checks your screen resolution and sends you an image which is a little larger than your Monitor resolution, resized in realtime. Did anyone check the "new" 500px already with a 4k (3.840 x 2.160 pixels) Monitor or with a virtual Desktop at that size? With my Monitor at 1280 x 1024 I get a max. image resolution of 1500 x 1000 with that "test-image" (I wasn't logged in). Imagus at Opera still works, but as the pages are no more static, it can only provide that 1500 x 1000 pixels. 

This change can reduce their traffic by approx. 20-30% which should be the reason why they did this change.

46 minutes ago, LoganJ said:

It seems like 500px now checks your screen resolution and sends you an image which is a little larger than your Monitor resolution, resized in realtime. Did anyone check the "new" 500px already with a 4k (3.840 x 2.160 pixels) Monitor or with a virtual Desktop at that size? With my Monitor at 1280 x 1024 I get a max. image resolution of 1500 x 1000 with that "test-image" (I wasn't logged in). Imagus at Opera still works, but as the pages are no more static, it can only provide that 1500 x 1000 pixels. 

This change can reduce their traffic by approx. 20-30% which should be the reason why they did this change.

 

Hm, interesting, I'll try that out. Unfortunately I'll have to spoof the res', only my tv is 4k. 

p.s.: I think you meant reduce bandwidth, but yah, sounds logical

10 minutes ago, neurovibe said:

 

Hm, interesting, I'll try that out. Unfortunately I'll have to spoof the res', only my tv is 4k. 

p.s.: I think you meant reduce bandwidth, but yah, sounds logical

 

You can connect your computer and your TV by HDMI and thus use your TV for testing (as a second Monitor - open the Browser on the TV screen).

 

Bandwidth is the speed and the amount of data the server can send within one second and is divided by the number of active users on the site. Traffic is the amount of data which is sent within a specific time. As the file-size is reduced, the traffic will be reduced and with the same Bandwidth as before, more users can get served at the same time. On the other hand, the short lag of realtime resizing is partly compensated by faster loading (less data) for users with lower screen resolution.

38 minutes ago, LoganJ said:

 

You can connect your computer and your TV by HDMI and thus use your TV for testing (as a second Monitor - open the Browser on the TV screen).

 

Bandwidth is the speed and the amount of data the server can send within one second and is divided by the number of active users on the site. Traffic is the amount of data which is sent within a specific time. As the file-size is reduced, the traffic will be reduced and with the same Bandwidth as before, more users can get served at the same time. On the other hand, the short lag of realtime resizing is partly compensated by faster loading (less data) for users with lower screen resolution.


Good idea, for the TV via HDMI.

I don't know if bandwidth is the correct term I used since yes, I know bandwidth (in all other senses and in home connections) is the amount per X time, such as volts vs amperage. I forget the word or maybe I used that word, every time I've coded websites or backends on servers, the hosting said bandwidth (or another word that I forget) as amount of data that can be served over a monthly invoice, thus my (maybe) confusion. I somehow always attributed traffic as unique users, maybe I was wrong. My reasoning, which I never apparently questioned post-2000's, was that the more unique visitors, the more bandwidth used. Well well

Meanwhile on IG:
Ph.: n/a Date: posted early July 2019 • Source: their IG  Res.: 1350px
oj0sSY0W_t.jpg U9jxBxsX_t.jpg utvzCf2K_t.jpg 5s7UXBwA_t.jpg w40058QC_t.jpg U7mV4GTx_t.jpg bcEFCqjp_t.jpg PIyArZoz_t.jpg tjWHAKwT_t.jpg AhM2PJiy_t.jpg

Ph.: Mikhail Kabochkin   Date: posted Jul.  2019   Source: his IG   Res.: 1080px

f0dXuFbC_t.jpg M6pGTZx3_t.jpg

Ph.: Rudiger Linden (Germany)  Date: Uploaded Jul 15, 2019 • Source: his 500px  Res.: 1000px

0zy7JEly_t.jpg

Ph.: Grégory Fountoussov  for: Couture de Nuit • Date: Posted July 22 2019 • Source: their IG   Res.: 1080

AIZGR2b3_t.jpg

PH: Kseniya Vetrova  Date: Posted July 22 2019 Source: Her IG Res': 1080

VEreS0pU_t.jpg W3KW6ww7_t.jpg1olXZ07q_t.jpg

Ph.: Frederic Wojcik • Date: posted July 23,2019  • Source: his IG  Res'.: 1080px

QoiJ37UM_t.jpg

Ph.: Markus Huber  Date: ?  Source: his 500px  Res.: 900

Spoiler

coKJlFal_t.jpg

I'm sure this has been posted before but maybe someone can figure out 500px new coding

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 1