From the Huff Post:

 

http://Emily Ratajkowski Reportedly Splits From Husband Sebastian Bear-McClard

 

 

Daily Mail:

 

The rise and fall of Emily Ratajkowski and Sebastian Bear-McClard's four-year relationship: Look back at how the couple got married just NINE DAYS after they started dating and ultimately split amid claims that the producer is a 'serial cheater'

 

 

TikTok

 

Emily Ratajkowski - Posing 07/21/2022

regular/color-contrast correction/slow motion


59 MB | 00:01:08 | 1080x1920 | mp4
K2S
Filejoker

I grew up in Southern California, heck I'm still growing up in SoCal, but I never lived in a swimsuit, I guess I'm going about this all wrong. 😬

 

 

Uh, her body so enviable. I understand male obsession with her.

Manhattan - 08/01/2022

Never without her baby 👶...mostly 😉 

12 hours ago, YouNoMe said:

Never without her baby 👶...mostly 😉 

She looks better without makeup on her face. 

1 hour ago, AnnKos said:

She looks better without makeup on her face. 

Yeah, she does! Have you read her book? (I haven't by the way, but I want to). What she says is sooooo true about women and our constant struggle for respectable places in society. I hadn't known and then when first introduced, hadn't fully accepted the puckish behaviours of Robin Thicke, but now... I was scanning through an article called, Selfies Gone Wrong and promptly saw a picture of Mr. Thicke rushing his hand up some women's skirt. 😮😵😳. Gee whiz. 

Anyway, being a woman certainly carries its weight, and that weight can be burdensome when interacting with the wrong crowd. The polarising and very scathing categories: submissive or slutty or passive or aggressive, doesn't capture the essence of any human, certainly not women. Ppl are a mix, a conglomerate of many traits. I'm glad she wrote her book, especially being a rather young woman herself. 

2 hours ago, YouNoMe said:

Yeah, she does! Have you read her book? (I haven't by the way, but I want to). What she says is sooooo true about women and our constant struggle for respectable places in society. I hadn't known and then when first introduced, hadn't fully accepted the puckish behaviours of Robin Thicke, but now... I was scanning through an article called, Selfies Gone Wrong and promptly saw a picture of Mr. Thicke rushing his hand up some women's skirt. 😮😵😳. Gee whiz. 

Anyway, being a woman certainly carries its weight, and that weight can be burdensome when interacting with the wrong crowd. The polarising and very scathing categories: submissive or slutty or passive or aggressive, doesn't capture the essence of any human, certainly not women. Ppl are a mix, a conglomerate of many traits. I'm glad she wrote her book, especially being a rather young woman herself. 

I saw the demo version of her book. I have dualistic feelings about: on one side she's right - model's life isn't that glamourious as we see. The business is actually awful and objectification of women is rough. But she continues making money by self objectification. She complains about it but still does it. Not gonna say woman should remove her sex appeal to be perceived seriously but she does it too much. Sex sells and she's gonna milk it dry. She needs to find the balance or future will be not good. 

41 minutes ago, AnnKos said:

I saw the demo version of her book. I have dualistic feelings about: on one side she's right - model's life isn't that glamourious as we see. The business is actually awful and objectification of women is rough. But she continues making money by self objectification. She complains about it but still does it. Not gonna say woman should remove her sex appeal to be perceived seriously but she does it too much. Sex sells and she's gonna milk it dry. She needs to find the balance or future will be not good. 

 

 

Our society is completely screwed up over this stuff right now.  There is obviously some awful behavior by some men, but it's not most men, and that behavior isn't acceptable to most people.  But, and big but, humans are biological creatures with wants and needs, including sexually.  Like all other creatures, at a certain point we have a "need" to want to procreate, thus sexuality.  To pretend that men shouldn't sexualize women and vice-versa is ridiculous and ignores biology, we just need to get to a point where we separate unacceptable behavior from normal sexuality again.

 

5 minutes ago, Bloodshot said:

 

 

Our society is completely screwed up over this stuff right now.  There is obviously some awful behavior by some men, but it's not most men, and that behavior isn't acceptable to most people.  But, and big but, humans are biological creatures with wants and needs, including sexually.  Like all other creatures, at a certain point we have a "need" to want to procreate, thus sexuality.  To pretend that men shouldn't sexualize women and vice-versa is ridiculous and ignores biology, we just need to get to a point where we separate unacceptable behavior from normal sexuality again.

 

Objectification is not about normal sexuality. She shouldn't turn to complete nun, she should quit overexposure of herself. Or quit complaining about being sexualised. Sex symbols have bad endings when they continue exploit sex appeal too much. 

13 minutes ago, AnnKos said:

Objectification is not about normal sexuality. She shouldn't turn to complete nun, she should quit overexposure of herself. Or quit complaining about being sexualised. Sex symbols have bad endings when they continue exploit sex appeal too much. 

 

Actually yes it is, both men and women objectify each other, it's called attraction!  Your response is exactly what's wrong right now, people can't separate normal sexuality from predatory behavior.

Balance is good. But sometimes, balance can be hard to find. The way I internalise her messages is women are often pigeon held and they can not fully express themselves how they wish without being unjustifiably branded. Now, how much is too much is unmistakably subjective. 

 

I love her style. 

 

Just My Opinion. 

1 hour ago, Bloodshot said:

 

Actually yes it is, both men and women objectify each other, it's called attraction!  Your response is exactly what's wrong right now, people can't separate normal sexuality from predatory behavior.

LOOOOOOOL

YEP! I'm OFFICIALLY JEALOUS!

 

On 8/6/2022 at 11:02 AM, YouNoMe said:

Balance is good. But sometimes, balance can be hard to find. The way I internalise her messages is women are often pigeon held and they can not fully express themselves how they wish without being unjustifiably branded. Now, how much is too much is unmistakably subjective. 

 

I love her style. 

 

Just My Opinion. 

 

I totally agree that balance is hard to find, very hard.  And I'm not a woman, so I don't know what it's like from their perspective at all.  I just believe that until we can get "real" about the biological needs and drives and both sides, the conversation is going to be very immature and continue to degrade and hurt our society at large.

Emily is an incredibly beautiful woman with a unique sex appeal. And she knows how she affects men. She totally uses her assets and I think that's totally fine. That's the only reason why Emily is famous and obviously she feels very comfortable presenting us her perfect body in such a sexy way.

 

@Bloodshot The biological need? Hmmm, the biological need, I've never considered that. My feminine journey has surely been riddled with well-pronounced hills and valleys. The uncertainty of not knowing what move to make, moves that would lead to acceptance, of course, was certainly my struggle. Whilst I understand quite well that I can not speak for the entire feminist movement or define what femininity should mean to the masses, I suppose I could speak on my experiences and how I believe they correlate with a). how I interpret Emily's advice, and, b). how I could effectively apply that advice to my journey if found relatable. 

Like most women, I want to feel desirable, I want to be influential for the generations behind me, and I want to be in the running. This need for approval is said to be beseeched by both sexes and with that search many trials are explored and executed. A portion of my adventure included a series of wardrobe changes strictly based on the overall reaction of my surroundings. There seems to be this film, this pollution in the airwaves that standardises what the benchmark of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness should be, and those preconceptions inevitably affect society. I watched a clip of an interview with Emily and she spoke about underestimating what feminism meant and what the criteria arose to be to properly acquire feats within this happening. She would later say, after pursuing that endeavour she became stunned 😧 by the insurmountable complexities that were, in part self-expression, and in another part, the effects of self-expression upon the progression of this movement (I've paraphrased). The task is not easy in many elements, and with that confession of misinterpretation of how it's done, resonated with me. And that's why I hail her undertakings in comprising a book that is testimonial, even if I don't agree with every single aspect of it. 

 

Thanks for the Response! 

I have a copy of her book but haven't read it.  However I have read the amazon reviews, hah.

 

The reviews indicate that it's about her views on her identity.  Critics say that the book is self-indulgent and narcissistic.  

 

But I can kind of understand how someone who is extremely good looking and makes millions with very little work can have a 'warped' mindset vs. ordinary people who have to work the fields... 

 

Basically, she's someone who was groomed to use her beauty to maximum leverage (like her beautiful mother) for wealth and status.  The book is a personal accounting of the consequence of her choosing this path and her deep, existential dissatisfaction with her life.  She has the money, could date really wealthy men for years, lives in the city, but feels empty/like an elite prostitute.