Cindy Crawford

[Stranger50]

7 hours ago, cylnz said:

Albert Watson, supposedly 1989

WOW. Thanks!😁

[cylnz]

For some reason I cannot edit the post above.

Supposed above is fake pic. I have posted the real unedited version here

[mainly]

30 minutes ago, cylnz said:

For some reason I cannot edit the post above.

Supposed above is fake pic. I have posted the real unedited version here

It’s just someone bumped up the contrast. Probably him. He posted it on his Instagram. Not really a fake.  . 

[cylnz]

yes, there's a whole bunch of folks over on phun who do/used to do what they called 'x-rays". 

[mainly]

2 hours ago, Stranger50 said:

The making clothing sheer thing is an easy and frequently employed manipulation in fakes.

its not fake. it's just the original photo with the exposure bumped up. he didn't add anything to the pic. the nipple was still visibale before but when the photo is brightened it becomes more visible.

 

of course there is what you might call fakery employed, (called retouching) where they change the look of the entire body, skin made clearer, waist made slimmer, legs made smaller, etc. but thats done by the photogs themselves.(actually they pay retouchers to do it) then published in magazine. this is done on every single photo of models. 

[cylnz]

That's the best I could find. 

[Marijana]

[Marijana]

[Marijana]

[Marijana]

[Marijana]

[Marijana]

[ser_franklin]

Cindy Crawford for Windsmoor, 1987

my scan

[Marijana]

[Marijana]

[Marijana]