mainly

depends on how bad you want it

pretty sure it's long gone.

maybe...

its not fake. it's just the original photo with the exposure bumped up. he didn't add anything to the pic. the nipple was still visibale before but when the photo is brightened it becomes more visible. of course there is what you might call fakery employed, (called retouching) where they change the look of the entire body, skin made clearer, waist made slimmer, legs made smaller, etc. but thats done by the photogs themselves.(actually they pay retouchers to do it) then published in magazine. this is done on every single photo of models.

not really. there is fakery done to photos, usually called retouching. but in this case it's just the exposure bumped up a bit. if you take a pic then bump up the expose in lightroom. does that mean its fake? it's called retouching. although ususally they do it to cover stuff up. not the other way around. but that's done in virtually every published fashion photo. legs made slimmer, face, arms made smoother, waist made smaller, skin color changed. but in this case the change may have even been done by the photog himself since he released the brightnened version on his own instagram, and cindy then commented on it herself. even the photo you posted was veery likely retouched.

the finals of these shoots are so heavily retouched if you saw the unretouched raw pics you would barely even recognoze them. unlikley we'll ever see any more from this shoot as it's so old. even the shots that were released later are stll retouched.

see through?

these don't show up when i searched on shutterstock...?

anyone have the video?

do you have the slides?

like this one... cant find it anywhere... https://www.pinterest.com/pin/53409945551617402/

oh yeah... that dumb site where theres no way to get hq originals...

nice pics! where are they from? do hqs exist???

you know who photog is?