wickedcrazyness Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Omg! No way, I hate those things, why couldnt they make just one movie, I dont care if it will last for four hours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 WB Photoshoot - 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sofinghood Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 yeah... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midnight lady Posted April 11, 2008 Share Posted April 11, 2008 it has been confirmed!!!Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II"The L.A Times is reporting an exclusive today: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II. Furthermore, the paper cites producer David Heyman confirming the return of David Yates as director for both films, with Steven Kloves to finish out his duties as screenwriter for both Harry Potter movies as well. The movies are to be filmed at the same time, and will be released several months apart, with Part One due November 2010, and Part Two, May 2011.The article has additional information now, with quotes from producer David Heyman on his conversation with Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling on splitting the book into two films. "Heyman said he approached Rowling with some trepidation about the strategy but found that she signed off on its logic rather quickly. "I went to Jo and she was cool with it," Heyman said, "and that was quite a relief."The newspaper continues saying "Producer David Heyman said the decision was made with some anxiety and only after considerable deliberations. The producer joked that "while my wife and Warner Brothers were pleased" to hear that the Potter movie magic will continue into the next decade, he himself fretted that the cynical observers would see the decision as a purely mercenary move."I swear to you it was born out of purely creative reasons," Heyman said during an interview in a converted airplane factory outside London that has been home base to all of the "Potter" productions. "Unlike every other book, you cannot remove elements of this book. You can remove scenes of Ron playing quidditch from the fifth book, and you can remove Hermione and S.P.E.W. [society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare] and those subplots . . . but with the seventh, that can't be done."Actor Dan Radcliffe who portrays Harry Potter in the film is quoted as saying "I think it's the only way you can do it without cutting out a huge portion of the book," Radcliffe said recently during a break on the set of "Half-Blood Prince," the sixth "Potter" film, which is due in theaters on Nov. 21. "There have been compartmentalized subplots in the other books that have made them easier to cut - although those cuts were still to the horror of some fans- but the seventh book doesn't really have any subplots. It's one driving, pounding story from the word go."Of interest to many fans is the spot in the book where the films will break, and producer David Heyman addresses this as he notes: "The question will be, where do you break it? And how do you make them one but two separate and distinct stories? Do you break it with a moment of suspense or one of resolution? These are the interesting challenges. But each book has presented its challenges." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted April 12, 2008 Share Posted April 12, 2008 it has been confirmed!!!Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II"The L.A Times is reporting an exclusive today: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II. Furthermore, the paper cites producer David Heyman confirming the return of David Yates as director for both films, with Steven Kloves to finish out his duties as screenwriter for both Harry Potter movies as well. The movies are to be filmed at the same time, and will be released several months apart, with Part One due November 2010, and Part Two, May 2011.The article has additional information now, with quotes from producer David Heyman on his conversation with Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling on splitting the book into two films. "Heyman said he approached Rowling with some trepidation about the strategy but found that she signed off on its logic rather quickly. "I went to Jo and she was cool with it," Heyman said, "and that was quite a relief."The newspaper continues saying "Producer David Heyman said the decision was made with some anxiety and only after considerable deliberations. The producer joked that "while my wife and Warner Brothers were pleased" to hear that the Potter movie magic will continue into the next decade, he himself fretted that the cynical observers would see the decision as a purely mercenary move."I swear to you it was born out of purely creative reasons," Heyman said during an interview in a converted airplane factory outside London that has been home base to all of the "Potter" productions. "Unlike every other book, you cannot remove elements of this book. You can remove scenes of Ron playing quidditch from the fifth book, and you can remove Hermione and S.P.E.W. [society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare] and those subplots . . . but with the seventh, that can't be done."Actor Dan Radcliffe who portrays Harry Potter in the film is quoted as saying "I think it's the only way you can do it without cutting out a huge portion of the book," Radcliffe said recently during a break on the set of "Half-Blood Prince," the sixth "Potter" film, which is due in theaters on Nov. 21. "There have been compartmentalized subplots in the other books that have made them easier to cut - although those cuts were still to the horror of some fans- but the seventh book doesn't really have any subplots. It's one driving, pounding story from the word go."Of interest to many fans is the spot in the book where the films will break, and producer David Heyman addresses this as he notes: "The question will be, where do you break it? And how do you make them one but two separate and distinct stories? Do you break it with a moment of suspense or one of resolution? These are the interesting challenges. But each book has presented its challenges." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midnight lady Posted April 12, 2008 Share Posted April 12, 2008 omg...that's going to take long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 omg...that's going to take long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleetus Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 WB Photoshoot - 2008 Another from the same shoot... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted April 19, 2008 Share Posted April 19, 2008 Article from The Hollywood Reporter:Harry Potter heroine Emma Watson is attached to star in the period romance Napoleon and Betsy, replacing Scarlett Johansson, who was deemed too old for the role. Watson, 18, will play Betsy Balcombe, a young, impetuous noblewoman trapped on the island of St. Helena who falls in love with Napoleon, who has been exiled there. Johansson, 23, is still serving as a producer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiamA Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Article from The Hollywood Reporter:Harry Potter heroine Emma Watson is attached to star in the period romance Napoleon and Betsy, replacing Scarlett Johansson, who was deemed too old for the role. Watson, 18, will play Betsy Balcombe, a young, impetuous noblewoman trapped on the island of St. Helena who falls in love with Napoleon, who has been exiled there. Johansson, 23, is still serving as a producer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Article from The Hollywood Reporter:Harry Potter heroine Emma Watson is attached to star in the period romance Napoleon and Betsy, replacing Scarlett Johansson, who was deemed too old for the role. Watson, 18, will play Betsy Balcombe, a young, impetuous noblewoman trapped on the island of St. Helena who falls in love with Napoleon, who has been exiled there. Johansson, 23, is still serving as a producer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spring{fever} Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 I really wish that she wouldn't wear such short dresses. But I do love Emma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memories Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
controversiaster Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 Wow, the trio looks really young there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetandlow Posted June 15, 2008 Share Posted June 15, 2008 She is the new face of Chanel's Coco Mademoiselle replacing Keira Knightley with a contract for two years worth 3million pounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
controversiaster Posted June 15, 2008 Share Posted June 15, 2008 Um, are you serious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetandlow Posted June 15, 2008 Share Posted June 15, 2008 Um, are you serious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 ^i'm surprised she is the one replacing Keira Knightley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarMELita Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 At first I was surprised too, but if you think about it: Emma loves Chanel, she's wearing it a lot, she's at every Chanel-Event, so surely she's familiar with the Chanel staff ... And then Karl seems to have a certain liking in IT-girls with the I-don't-care-what-people-say-attitude ... (which is exactly what Emma's like at the moment with all the partying and Paparazzi-pics) ... (although I'm so glad she's celebrating youth & life in not as bitchy a way as Lindsay Lohan ...) ... (I'm only refering to Lindsay coz I know Karl thinks she's cool - said so in an interview - not because I want to diss LiLo or judge the way she prefers to live ...). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.