Bridgeburner7

Huh. Interesting. Do you know what the shoot was for, or when it was done? I'm really surprised I didn't know about this.

She has? I'm assuming you mean not only topless nudity, but also full frontal nudity as well? If so, I was not aware of that, and you can color me surprised. I thought she had only ever done topless nudity. Just to clarify, I know she has been completely naked in shots before, but to my knowledge it was only ever "completely naked", without actually showing anything, most of the time not even her nipples. Similar to how Barbara is "completely naked" in this controversial photo for Love magazine. Meaning yes she is technically completely naked, but besides her boobs, you can't see any more naughty bits.

Even if that statement wasn't completely true, it's not like her boobs were already so small that they couldn't afford to be any smaller. With as big as they were/are, if you ask me, it would not be a big deal for them to get a bit smaller.

I don't think I would like it on her all the time, but for this shoot I think she looks good and pulls it off well.

Yes she really does.

Doutzen looks incredibly sexy in that photo. That booty is looking especially fantastic.

So hot.

Her body looks incredible if you ask me, and while I know I am likely in the minority here, considering nobody else likes it when a model like Emily gets fit and her boobs get smaller, but I truly think her body has never looked better. Her boobs are no longer in the "to big" category for my personal preference. I love it.

What gets me is how you are so sure she is lying, when in my opinion that is completely incongruous with her personality. Like I said before, I could see her just never commenting on the issue, but not blatantly lying about it, when it's so much easier to neither confirm nor deny something. You keep talking like your some boob expert, and it's a fact that she got a boob job, but it is pure speculation with no actual proof on your part. It would be different if you said something like "in my opinion it is likely she got a boob job", but you aren't, your saying it like a fact, and it isn't. You also said, "she has lost/gained weight since 2014 yet her boobs haven't changed one bit". I completely disagree with that, I have been saying for over a year now that part of me believes she did not get a boob job because her boobs have changed in size from time to time. Sometimes I would think she must have gotten them done, and then there would be times when they would definitely look smaller, and that always gave me doubt. In that twitter comment she said she thought her boobs would never come, but she hit puberty really late, and they finally did, essentially. I think it is more likely that they came late due to late puberty and birth control, and she just didn't feel like telling the birth control part to the whole world. To me that is way more likely of an outcome then her lying about it, and that is for two reasons. Number one, it seems way out of character for her to lie about it, opposed to just not saying anything about it, and number two, I have personally commented about her boobs changing sizes multiple times over the months/years.

Your entitled to your opinion of course, but I personally can't see Josephine lying like that. I feel like if she had gotten a boob job, then she would have just never commented on it, not flat out lie about it. I have been saying for ever now that I was skeptical about the fact that many believed she for sure got a boob job, and the reason was always do to how much her boobs fluctuate in size from time to time over the months. So I personally am going to choose to believe Josephine on this one, until someone can show some actual definitive proof on the matter proving her wrong. If you ask me, she has definitely earned the benefit of the doubt from her fans.

Her everything has been looking incredible the past few days, but yes I especially agree about her amazing butt.

I've seen the first pages of this this thread, and I too remember when they were much smaller. I just wanted to know if there was any irrefutable proof that they are indeed fake? Just to clarify, I'm not saying they aren't fake, but just for the sake of argument, could it not be possible that they got much bigger seemingly in no time, from her starting birth control? Again I have seen the evidence you have seen that suggest they are fake. However, since the time when they got way bigger, I have also seen many photos here and there where they look much smaller then the times when they look obviously fake. So some small part of me believes maybe they aren't fake, because birth control could explain why they often look much smaller at times, because on birth control they could still fluctuate in size from time to time. Not to mention the use of push-up bras and chicken cutlets, and all that stuff. Being fake, one could argue that they would only ever look as big as they usually do. So yeah, this is why I wonder if there is any confirmation of hard proof, so I can finally lay this to bed in my own mind, let alone in discussions like this.

I too would really like to know the answer to that question!

Is there anything to prove that without a doubt, or is it just the general consensus that they are fake?

I like her new hair color, but sadly I think a lot of my like has to do with the fact that this is the most edgy thing she has done in years. She has been so far from her old risqué/edgy self for so long now, the new hair gives me hope that she might be returning to that former self, if only just a bit. Unfortunately it's probably just wishful thinking on my part, but man do I miss the old Karlie Kloss.

I completely agree. America especially could benefit greatly from a more enlightened, less assbackwords stance on nudity.

You make it sound like being topless on a beach is a bad or crazy thing to do, when it's not. Many places have topless beaches, and they can even be found in America. For all we know though, she could have taken her top off just for that photo, or she was tanning her back laying chest down and she decided to take that photo before she put her top on, after she sat up or something. Either way it's not a big deal, and it wouldn't be for anyone, but especially not for Elsa, considering how many times she has had nude work published.

I could not agree more, because unless those two photos are misleading, her butt is looking absolutely amazing.

Why must they always be censored? It should be a crime to censor such great nipples.

+100

Thats what I thought.

+1

I'm sorry, but comparing the nude editorials Candice (and other models like her)has done to porn is completely ridiculous. The same goes for saying she is nude in every shoot. I wish there was some truth to that, but the truth is she is only naked a small fraction of the time. As for models like Candice or say Edita Vilkeviciute for example, being willing to do nudity, it doesn't make them less serious of a model. If anything it shows a seriousness and dedication to ones craft. Anyone can model with clothes on, but it takes even more dedication to model naked, and I am sure that most in the industry see it that way as well. Even if you don't believe that, what nude work Adriana has done is no different then that of many models that do nudity, including Candice. I don't think any of Candice or Adriana's nude work is trashy or porn like for the record, but what is so classy about the nude work Adriana has done, and how is it so different then that of Candice's nude work? In the last 7 years Adriana has been naked for Russell James Angels book, and those were pretty similar to the ones Candice also did for that book. She was also topless for V magazine and Vogue Italy, two magazines Candice has also been topless for. Last but not least, Adriana went topless for Pirelli, and those photos definitely were not the most classy. I mean come on, in one of the photos Adriana was on her hands and knees completely naked besides wearing long black latex dominatrix looking gloves, and she was practically shoving her surgically augmented boobs in your face. How is that the definition of classy nudity, and how is it so much better and more classy then the nudity Candice has done? For the record I love Adriana and I don't have any problems with the nude work she has done. I just don't see how it's any different then most of Candice's nude work, or that of other models like Candice.

What exactly are you asking about?

That is definitely one of her best body parts, but if you ask me, they are all pretty pretty much equally perfect. She is definitely on fire lately. Does anyone know what that amazing photo of her in the bathtub is for?