Monkey

What are you going to upload it to? YouSendit?

Eh... I'm not even going to get to watch... dammit. Too many people around. They'll think I'm some kind of purvy bastard. My dad's gonna be sitting at the computer, no doubt, "writing an email," so if I try to turn on something even remotely sexual he'll flip out.

I know, but they never explicitly said that's what they intended to do. Anyway, I like the 799MB+ deal, very convenient.

So was Selita Ebanks. It was good. Yes, HD is high definition. Are you guys going to somehow post one massive file, or several smaller ones?

Several of the models are going to be on Fox news in just a minute. Make sure you tune in!

A charming interview.

The O.C. An idiotic excuse for entertainment. It's nothing more than a glamorous soap opera. It's the new religion; every week high school and college kids kneel before the TV to worship the sordid affairds of Mischa Barton and co., and then discuss the show to death till the next show. Other shows I hate: Laguna Beach Rock Star [insert washed-up shitty band here] American Idol Prison Break House, MD Anything on MTV except for Pimp My Ride Anything on VH1 Anything on "Teen Nick" All "Reality" TV shows CSI More to come.

BUMP I want people to see.

She's going to be on On the Record w/ Greta Van Sustren at 10:00 PM on Fox news... that's 20 minutes away!

Eh... she could've picked worse.

Thanks for that.

Eh? We're free to express ourselves on this forum. People do it all the time. "Eww, she's ugly," "I hate her personality," "Meh... KoRn are shit," etc., etc. As far as Harry Potter goes, there is legitimate criticism to be made, but then, I don't think they were ever intended to be nearly as deep and profound as many people have made them out to be. A lot of fans (the people over at www.mugglenet.com are a good example) blindly worship Rowling; they'll except any shit she throws at them as a literary masterpiece. The fact is, Rowling's work is not nearly as good it's made out to be. It's entertainment. It's fun and addicting, but that doesn't mean it's going to mean jack shit 20 years from now. Really great literature, books like Moby-Dick and The Red Badge Of Courage, have real depth; multiple layers of meaning and statement. On the surface they're adventure stories, like Harry Potter; but if you dig deeper into a really great book like these or another, there's a lot of other things to be found in those books -- be it some kind of philosophical exploration (like Moby-Dick), or whatever else, it means something more important than just some stupid story about a teenager. Harry Potter isn't very original, either. It's a pretty generic concept -- the little average joe finding out he's "the chosen one" to defeat the super epitome-of-pure-evil villain. And of course, his eventual victory has nothing to do with being stronger than the evil guy, but is instead some cheesy cliche crap about "love." Rowling's books were a big part of my childhood; I've read them all several times, apart from Half-Ass Prince. I suspect I'll even re-read them before the next one comes out, but they must be kept in perspective; they are NOT great meaningful literature.

What file format will it be posted in?

http://home.comcast.net/~alanweiss3/dwedit...lmcdonalds.html

I'm watching Super Size Me right now. It's disturbing, but then again, I already thought fast food is gross.

By far the most romantic thing a girl has ever done to me is tell me she liked my Led Zeppelin t-shirt.

David Gilmour

Judas Priest -- "Between The Hammer & The Anvil"

Dayum

Lingerie/Underwear Duh.

The Rolling Stones -- "Get Off My Cloud"

Will we be getting a video of the interview any time soon? I didn't get to see the entire thing. <_<

Sweet, thanks.