DylanSuperfly

" Let it be Paris, please " Well I can't go to Paris for this FW cause I broke my left shoulder and elbow, so I would be veeeerrrryyyy sad to not shoot her AGAIN

I feel the same !!!

I hope no ahaha

I agree with you

I guess the Reebok shoes was an "excuse" to show her legs Just tell me one thing, please tell me she's wearing a thong...

At least she could have been show the shoes in their entirety....

It's the same kind of physique yes. A lot of people look like them on the streets

In this interview she says that she lives in New York, it's a "old" interview ?

She looks really happy with him, so I'm happy that she is happy EDiT : I was watching some videos of our French artist Marina Kaye when I saw Miranda, so if someone's interested : ( It was during The Cannes film festival )

I love this kind of shoot, it's sober ( can we use it this say ? ).

Ahah I think she's still the cutest

I soo love the Marella campaign, it's so fresh !

Good article on GRAZIA

Yes it's Anna Ewers. With Binx Walton, Lexi Boling, Anne Gaby Odielle and I don't remember the name of the other models

With Doutzen and Lily ?

I don't get why she still works with Richardson..

So now I just hope that people magazines will stop saying sh*t about her relationship.

WHAT?? noooo! Lindsey shouldve stayed for HF. 7Fam is Miranda's bread and butter! I agree on the fact that Lindsey Wixson is way better for Haute Couture.

And the makeup is not helping, but sure she's beautiful.

http://www.si.com/swim-daily/2013/04/02/emily-didonato-25-facts-about-me Didn't know that, thanks.

She's sooo cute !

Kiki, I noticed that for some people a girl wearing short skirt is a dirty hooker. So afterall, in the end, I guess it takes a dirty mind to think of dirty things. And that is my only explanation I have for people seeing hookers everywhere. When a short skirt is wearing beautifully, there's nothing bad. You'd like to see your sister or your daughter strike the pose like this with those clothes ( talking about Palvin's photo ) ? I know that a lot of people will say that she's hot and that they would like to **** her, and I know it not because that's what I think but because THAT'S WHAT I READ AND HEAR. It's not against Barbara, once again what I love is to see the Haute Couture and Prêt-à-Porter runways and to shoot the girls after they walked. That's what Fashion is for me. When you see a mannequin, Саша Лусс for exemple, there's something mystic, strange, like if they were from an other world. The real model is not the one that you see in those freaking gossip magazines, but the ones who really work ! The ones you fan see during every NY, Milan, London and Paris Fashion Week. This is modeling. Now I will not say more, 'cause I know everyone don't agree with ( it's okay about that ) and I don't want to be the one that will be bashed because I don't agree with other people. EDiT : I'm not a fucking puritan, and surely not an fucking féminist. Bye

It's strange cause the models I shot seem to be fine with me ( Boling, Ginneken, Xi, Hoarau etc )

You call that becoming a woman ? Do you really think she has to do some suggestive poses like this one to become an interesting model and, more importantly, a woman ?I'm tired of all these "sexual" shoots in the industry ! I find it, not disgusting, but not beautiful. It's not sexy, not glamour, not.... Not modeling for me. It's like the photographer said " Let's do it, strike that pose, great. Now guys, you can go fap ". I really don't like it. ( I feel the same for Kroes, Aldridge etc ones ) "sigh" is always what i do when I read this thread.When I watch a photo I watch every details & I am happy we do not share the same eyes because that "suggestive pose" you are talking about is the last thing I see in this picture. And to me it's not sexually suggestive at all. Her face and especially her eyes/ gaze are amazing and mores sexual than any "suggestive" pose. She delivers so much with her facial expression, it's simply amazing and I thought she would never be able to do that. So yes, she is becoming a great model and a woman. And "sexual shoot" -as you call it- in the fashion world is what make this same fashion world more interesting and the models less mannequins ps: I suggest you guys to have a look on Helmut Newton and Guy Bourdin work. nudity and sexuality in fashion are not new and they where the masters of it. I Do not want to sound paternalist but it's always good to learn that, fashion is so much more than the bland and photoshoped L'oreal and Victoria's secret's pictures. For me L'Oreal and VS are not Fashion, it's just really cheap with horrible photoshop. " less mannequin " is the problem for me. I shot some models after Chanel & Valentino during PFW in September 2014, and that's what is Fashion for me : Haute Couture and Prêt-à-porter. A model who doesn't walk is not a real ( true ) model... Alessandra Ambrosio walks some runways sometimes but she's nothing in modeling compared to girls like Binx Walton, Lexi Boling or the young Yana Van Ginneken. You have 10% chances to see Palvin, Prinsloo or Swanepoel at the PFW, and VS is everything but modeling... Why should them be less mannequin ? It's their job, they walk. It's better to see them walking every runways during every Fashion Week than strike the pose 1 time per month for some bikinis. Of course nudity is not new, but it's often disgusting or suggestive. Nudity like Chris Colls do is beautiful, there's nothing sexual... With this W Mag shoot, take a man in the street and ask him what hé thinks about it : he will say that she's pretty hot ( for 85% of people ). This is what is Fashion ? Hot women doing hot things ? No. EDIT : You're French ? Cause me too, would like to talk about this in my language, it would be easier lol

Same, I don't know why they'd do this. But well, we'll see