cherrybomb

really? I can't. She looks better in the maroon/dark red dress than this, but still-no.

she has officially ruined her face and there is no going back. I keep hoping to finally see a group of candids that reflect her past beauty. But now all of her candids look the same. Boring even, her face is too plastic.

I do think Adriana is getting older and it's about time she does depart from VS. I don't want her to stay there into her mid 30s. But as a fan, I know it's most likely the only way we'll be seeing much of her. And of course, leave it to the people that handle her twitter to post irrelevant and disconnected photos and quotes on her twitter. She looked so fresh, as she was. For me 2010 was the last year where I still felt she had a better present than most girls. I didn't like Dri in 2011 & 2012.

Francisco Lachowski (6) Mathias Lauridsen (7) Marlon Teixeira (7) Andrew Cooper (6) Noah Mills (7) Sean Opry (8) Eugen Bauder (5) Ryan Taylor (3) David Gandy (8) Evandro Soldati (4)

http://supermodelgif.tumblr.com i can't waiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit for django seriously...just a few more weeks

Its why Ana has this form : Ana is a genius obviously But in all seriousness. The way that some of these people get worked up, offended, or hurt about statements made on the internet. I'm jealous. I wish I had their lives? And the most moving problem in my life was someone saying something offensive or rude on bellazon.

Adriana Lima ‏@AdrianaLima Do your dreams scare you? If they don't, they're not big enough. Love, Adriana http://fb.me/1Oj7Sb4W6 I haven't been to her twitter in forever. Something we all can agree on... forgot how incredibly pathetic her feed actually is. I really wish she had better people on her team.

some of you guys are so f*cking sensitive it's unbelievable. Is it possible that statements and perceptions are derived from our OWN experiences and there is no facts when it comes to how you perceive the cultural issues of the Arab world? The subject title of this thread in general. IMO is a non issue. In it's origin, someone finding green eyed blonde haired white girls more attractive than people with alternative features is hardly ignorant or rude, it's called a preference. What is ignorant, is to go and call other races dark and ugly-yes I agree, but how is preferring one set of features or even ethnicity or race(in terms of physical/sexual attraction) over another wrong in any regard? Like Kiki said, there are people that have fetishes. This is sometimes seen as creepy, but rarely ignorant/rude/racist. Dreamss.. As for the fair and lovely cream. One of my good friends (Indian, from Delhi) used to have her aunt from India bring those small tubes of that cream to the states every time she visited. I remember watching a commercial in a social justice course I took, that featured an Indian woman losing her boyfriend to a fair skinned woman. It was an advertisement for a cream or something. Now that and the message it sends is offensive, but the issue of why light skin is desired goes deeper than that. I looked for the video on youtube, couldn't find it but found this . ridiculous

But Candice isn't necessarily known nor is she as popular as I think we all like to think. I don't see Candice being in the #1 spot unless she has a time where she blows up like Dri did or even like Miranda did. Kate upton is still at #3 which is pretty high up there but she's been everywhere. Extremely relevant in main stream America. But I have zero problem believing that men would vote for Jennifer Lawrence or Emma Stone over Candice if it went by name. Or if it went by just a few pictures. Because think about how much of Emma stone the average guy has seen. She's everywhere, and a lot of men are drawn to her humor. I think you put what you're familiar with ahead of what you're not when it comes to polls like this. Especially Ask men where they time and time state again that it's about personality too and who's most likable /desirable (not saying that I buy into that). But if given a choice between emma/jennifer...girls they've seen hundreds of pictures with and maybe even films (2 hours of) with, compared to candice who they might not be familiar with... a few pictures of candice on the website when you're about to vote compared to all of what you've seen of Emma/Jennifer really isn't a fair measure. I would say most people go with what they know. And for it to be fixed, I guess we interpreted it in different ways. I meant that they don't actually consider votes of the people that vote through their websites, instead they already predetermine what girls will go where based on their popularity already. I still find it unlikely that managers/agents call Ask men...BUT wtf, chanel is #26? that alone might make me think otherwise and agree with you... there's really no reason for her to randomly end up on that list. Let alone before girls like Adri or Charlize. weird. Who cares though really? These lists are a complete joke.

Ask men.com's list have to do with a model/celeb's agent? I've never really heard of that before. I recall seeing girls like Lea michele (when glee first hit big) and emma stone (when she was in literally every movie coming out) near the top of the list. Lea IMO is in no way attractive (different for different people of course) but from what I've seen it has strictly to do with relevance and press as far as the top spots are concerned. Even the 'voting' when you ask someone to vote from someone who is constantly shoved in their face because they have a big movie out or a model they have never heard of, they're likely to go with the first. Even if there are photographs of both choices. I really don't think men go out of their way to google names just to vote. I'm in agreement about the votes being fixed. But I don't think agents would be concerned with Ask men's top 99 desirable women list enough to contact them about it. At least I've never seen anything that implies so. Not sure about maxim (however their list is laughable as well)

I just looked at the list jennifer lawrence is #1. I love her, as an actress...as a personality, and she's very relate-able. But #1 most desirable? Like I said, Relevance in terms of projects for the most part.

they probably didn't even know she was pregnant most of this year. They desire her off of what they know of her. These lists only have to do with relevance when it comes to movie stars/musicians. The most relevant ones usually get the top spots (or the girls that had a huge year like upton), Adriana would have been on there even if she did nothing this year (including the superbowl ads, the vs show, etc)

^ not at all actually

look at u... making sense and all I've never seen cherrybomb make anything but perfect sense, actually. :morning:

All of us get annoyed when extreme Adriana fans get offended/upset about people making negative comments about Adriana. In fact, we make endless jokes about it. Why is it different when people make negative comments about Miranda? is people being upset/offended when comments about miranda's tactics are made not the same damn thing as the idiots who cry when people say something negative things about Adriana? live and let live. if you don't agree with someone, get over it and let them share their opinion anyway without drawing more attention to it by responding.

I don't think they're surprised by just Adriana. This is said by many people of a lot of models that fit into being professional. It's probably just an overall perception of models rather than Adriana in particular.

I just saw her ads and it wasn't the ads that looked terrible, her face did. But there's nothing you can do about that! I think aside from that they looked great. Hers was a location shoot though and it seems they kept Adriana in the studio so we'll see. It was both. Obviously megan has gone overboard with the surgery but the ads themselves weren't appealing to me either. The ones outside were especially bad. Some of the shots of megan indoors (her face aside) looked decent. Despite the girls. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, and there's always hope that they do things better (or even better) this time around.

There are far worse things said that are tolerated by all Mods on this forum than the phrase 'attention/fame whore'. I know what you mean when you say you don't care. Everyone is definitely in their right to make of it what they want. Some might say 'it might be pathetic, but so?' and that's entirely fine. About the media caring about models (especially American) that's true, it's usually Miranda, Kate, and Ale etc. Has anyone noticed that in recent months daily mail has started featuring less heard of models more (and individually rather than grouping them in with other girls) for example I recently saw an article about maryna linchuk, featuring only her. They usually include her with Candice and whoever else is shooting VS swim, but I hadn't seen an article on just her on that website before.

I understand when people say 'it's smart' (business wise) but just because it's smart, doesn't mean it's not petty. There have been successful people who have done without all of the types of things Miranda does to promote herself. I don't see anything wrong with someone expressing that they're not a fan of the methods Miranda turns to? Using the logic that modeling is the same thing as calling the paparazzi when you're about to step out doesn't make sense to me. If they were, there wouldn't be certain models you can compare/contrast and it's evident that they don't both "attention whore". I think it wouldn't make sense to argue that what Miranda does has indeed helped her career (I do think she's smarter than all of the VS angels as far as branding herself goes) but it's not a huge ordeal to simply point out that the girl puts all things 2nd to getting any type of attention. Nothing wrong with discussing that... as that's really all we do on these forums (discuss models, their work and what they do)

metrocity f*cking sucks. But I guess it's something. All of megan's ads looked so terrible too.

why does Barbara have to "replace"anyone? literally speaking, yes if one angel goes they'll want to fill the spot...but what does that have to do with comparing the incoming girl to the leaving veteran? i mean ale is going to leave...lets say they replace her with Bregje, where is the comparison?

it says that she looks generic lol

Thanks for confirming. For a minute there I didn't believe the same thing when Savanna said it.