slacker
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by slacker
-
Love the video discussing Demarchelier... also, 1992 was really a peak year for her, don't you agree? -
i'm really doubtful that these are from 1991. My guess would be 1993 at the absolute earliest, and more likely 1994-1997. Knowing exactly which perfume product she's holding would help, but what I know for sure is that she barely even appeared in their catalogs in 1991. Nice find though!
-
Yeah, I think he pinches himself every day to make sure he is not dreaming. She pinches him to let him know he's not dreaming. LOL.
-
I want to thank brazilianaffair for the great uploads to this thread - I thought I'd seen all of the Stephanie photos that can be seen, short of a private tour of Sante D'Orazio's personal archives (and I've actually met Sante on more than one occasion, but no invite yet LOL) - so i wanted to upload some old UHQ scans that I don't think I've ever uploaded before. I sincerely hope these get spread far and wide, all over the internet, forever. I also hope Stephanie herself downloads them, and looks back fondly on the peak years of her career. I have quite a few more scans, and will upload soon. Could someone suggest an image host that can handle individual image files that are 10MBs+? PostImg wouldn't accept the images, otherwise you would see about 5 more already. I guess using Bellazon's own uploader is a good option... just looking for suggestions as to what people prefer.
INCREDIBLE uploads, not90 - thank you! I've been following this model for about a year, and she's really amazing.
it's hard to believe how great she's looking in these Met Gala photos.... almost "deal with the devil" good!
That's a great shot, and if it was ever published before my guess would be one of the small, desktop calendars that S.I. put out. It looks slightly familiar to me. Thanks for the post!
For the rest of us, there are 7 deadly sins. For Stephanie, there are only 6: "vanity" is not included. Stay vain, Steph! (Re: the current beach photos)
You guys are reading a lot into that behind the scenes photo. I assure you that every person on that set has a specific job related to the shoot. Maybe, just maybe the director or Ed Razek allowed a friend in to watch... maybe... but those people are almost certainly all working and getting paid to be there. P.S. - lolololol
All of these girls are EMPLOYEES of a CORPORATION called LIMITED BRANDS. The company has SHAREHOLDERS. The girls have a BOSS. They are paid a SALARY on CONTRACT. Sometimes they get FIRED, sometimes they get PROMOTED. They do what they're TOLD. I hope I have clearly explained the REAL WORLD to all of you. Now let's get back to praising Candice's natural beauty and posting awesome pictures of her flawless face and figure >
I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but I never thought I'd see two pages of discussion about a "Bra Conspiracy." Bravo!
thank you, brazilian affair!
Candice is on fire in the new VS shots. Hint: 380590, 382775 (and there's a lot more). Go get 'em, fans
Most of you are looking at the issue the wrong way. This is how it works: You're looking for a job, and you get two competing offers with contracts: 1) $250,000 per year, 1 year contract, limited North American exposure on billboards, magazine ads, no television spots, uptight corporate environment that doesn't really care about you or your long-term career, most of the work is shot in photo studios and locations in NYC / LA 2) $5,000,000 per year contract for 5 years, mass worldwide exposure on television, magazine ads, billboards, public appearances, V.S. Fashion Show, photo shoots in St. Barths, St. Tropez, NYC, LA, South Africa, Thailand, etc etc etc, a "family like" atmosphere and team that cultivates you into a star, helping you to land other lucrative contracts with top brands Which job would you accept if you were Candice?
look for an app called "flash decompiler." you may be able to extract the images. i love camila but i don't have time
keep up the great work, brazilianaffair! your posts are appreciated. i've never seen that GQ 1991 editorial, and I thought I had seen everything
That's one of my favorite shots of her and I would KILL to see a super-sized version of it. I won't lie, I dislike the fact it isn't FF but I guess the fact Candice does topless and not FF makes her unique.
yes! that image was on the inside cover of the new york times magazine around 1992 (maybe 1991). stephanie was at her absolute peak then, IMHO.
I was the original scanner of this picture more than 10 years ago (the one tagged "DHARMA"). At the time I wanted my scans disseminated as far and wide as possible because I realized if I ever lost them SOMEONE out there would still have them... and sure enough! Smart idea, right? Thanks for finding and posting that!
She was always my favorite, so I was pretty awestruck when I managed to get to her "Beauty for Dummies" book signing in NYC at a Barnes and Noble back around 1999. She gave me her autograph and I got to talk to her. I'm not the "get starstruck" type but that time I was. I have to say, a lot of models don't look as good in person as in pictures, but Stephanie looks BETTER in person. She was so beautiful it actually hurt to look at her. She looks like she could have landed from another planet. I also saw her a few years ago at an NYC club we both ended up at. She was with her now ex-husband, Peter Brandt. She was looking fantastic for her age. In contrast, a few years ago I sat a few feet away from Linda Evangelista at another club and she has not held up nearly as well.... or is it that she just didn't spend as much money on facelifts? Either way... Stephanie is a goddess.
i stand corrected!
yeah, the third one from left at the top is definitely olga, maybe the fourth and fifth pics too. the other pics are the other model mentioned.
just off the top of my head i'm pretty sure that's olga kurylenko (the bond girl in "quantom of solace"). she was already a top model before her acting gig in that movie.
