Jump to content

jOEh

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jOEh

  1. I am so happy top see Cindy & Paulina together again. ๐Ÿ˜
  2. Not necessarily "less beautiful"โ€”I consider her peak in 1992โ€”but there was a significant change in her features, plus she waxed her eyebrows at some point in 1990. She herself refers to her 80s face as "fat baby" or "baby face." All I can say is that I love her 1986-1989 face.
  3. Her face was so beautiful in 1988. When did it really changed? I guess in 1990.
  4. VOGUE ๐Ÿ˜
  5. Not Cindy. Thats not her body. Not her waist. Not her nipples. ๐Ÿคจ
  6. Not Cindy. Check this out.
  7. In my opinion, not Renee. ๐Ÿ˜
  8. It could be but also I know that many advertising was intended only to be shown in outdoors. Not printed in magazines or catalogs. ๐Ÿ™‚
  9. OMG really? I never thought that I would post something that you don't have it. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ But it makes sense since it was a Billboard. Probably never printed in a magazine. The source is here. https://repository.duke.edu/dc/outdooradvertising/SLA2351 What I posted is a photoshop edit to fix it.. ๐Ÿ˜†
  10. Yes, Cindy from the Vogue/Playboy photoshoot
  11. I love this! looks like Cindy 1988 but It is from 1991.
  12. So beautiful ๐Ÿ˜ and with Karen Alexander. Thanks for sharing!
  13. Robinson's 1986
  14. Herb Ritts. Max Pinnell, the hairstyler,said that It was a picture rejected by Vogue. Then British Elle licensed the image.
  15. Beautiful HQ picture by photographer Dimitri Halkidis More pictures here. https://www.dimitrihalkidis.com/Fashion/NYFW-1991/1/thumbs
  16. Marijana. Thanks a lot for sharing all these pictures. You are a great collector. ๐Ÿ˜˜
  17. Thats not Cindy ๐Ÿ™„
  18. Betty Prado and Barry Kaufman by Helmut Newton ๐Ÿ˜—
  19. wow, those pictures are from the TATLER photoshoot! Cindy looks amazing in the video!, everything is better than the actual pictures. ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿ˜„
  20. Totally. In 1992 she stopped doing fashion shows regularly and since then only did very special requests. Like this one for Richard Tyler in 1995. Cindy was always the superstar of every fashion show she did after 1992.
  21. wow, she looks fantastic!!! thanks Andra! ?
  22. They are so ridiculous and dumb, especially the ones in TFS forum. First they say Kaia is a "nepotism" model, that everything she does is thanks to Cindy. And later they say that Cindy was nothing in the fashion world. So, if for them Cindy was "nothing" how is that "Thanks to Cindy" Kaia is getting jobs. Stupid people.
  23. I don't understand why some people is hating that cover. It's Cindy! that's how she looks nowadays and it's great.
  24. In the original editorial (Vogue USA) was also Karen Mulder.
  25. exactly.