donbot

Beautiful, thanks Emilia

Wow I wonder why it was reversed

Model: Marisa x 3 Actress: Gong x 3 Pose: Christy x 3 Original: Natasha x 1, Linda x 2 Group: Dazed & Confused x 3

17. Marion Cotillard 18. Jessica Alba 19. Michelle Monaghan 20. Amanda Seyfried 21. Sienna Miller 22. Natalie Martinez 23. Thandie Newton 24. Eva Green

ROTW 2.5

Diana Villas Boas [1] Lana Zakocela [1]

Lana Zakocela [4] Cintia Dicker [0] Catherine McNeil [3.5] Isabeli Fontana [4] Angelina Jolie [1] Alejandra Alonso [2]

9. Milla Jovovich 10. Halle Berry 11. Amy Acker 12. Salma Hayek 13. Jennifer Love Hewitt 14. Olga Kurylenko 15. Rose Byrne 16. Katie Cassidy

Fabiana Lips: 8 Smile: 7 Hair: 8 Eyes: 10 Nose: 8 Abs: 10 Cleavage: 10 Butt: 10 Legs: 10 Nicole Lips: 9 Smile: 7 Hair: 8 Eyes: 9 Nose: 8 Abs: 8 Cleavage: 7 Butt: 8.5 Legs: 7 Ariadne Lips: 8.5 Smile: 9 Hair: 9 Eyes: 8 Nose: 8 Abs: 10 Cleavage: 8 Butt: 10 Legs: 10 Yamila Lips: 9 Smile: 6 Hair: 8 Eyes: 7 Nose: 6 Abs: 8.5 Cleavage: 7 Butt: 8 Legs: 8

Thanks all

Za Cosmetics: 1.5. wtf Valentino: 4. Lovely Cover Girl: 1. Boss: We've already had this one L'Oreal: 2.5. Bad dubbing On the other hand.. legs :brows: Lacoste: 2.

Can't wait for this album to drop

Diana Villas Boas [2] Rosemary Smith [0]

High Style x 3

1. Amber Heard 2. Rachel McAdams 3. Kristin Kreuk 4. Odette Yustman 5. Penelope Cruz 6. Emilie De Ravin 7. Zooey Deschanel 8. Mary Elizabeth Winstead

Model: Edita x 3 Actress: Natalie x 3 Pose: Ale x 3 Original: Chanel x 3 Group: Vogue China x 3

ROTW 4

That's fair enough, but I still don't think it warrants such low scores in those cases. You can still get a decent suggestion of what the outfit looks like, and it's not as though the back view is irrelevant to scoring considerations. It just gives the impression that the votes are going towards purely how elegant the front of the outfit is, not how elegant the person looks in that particular photo, all things considered. 1: 6 2: 7 3: 7 4: 5 5: 8 6: 7 Overall: 6.67

Indeed.. It's funny though that she's doing much better than several others that have come before her (even without the 'counter-balance' votes), and she's certainly not the first to be slammed with 1s. Surely you're aware that these extreme votes happen in almost every comp around here, whether it actually be from bias or people just wanting to show emphatic opinion. It's just got your nose out of joint here because it's against someone who you think highly of in the scale of elegance, coupled with the way you've pinned her as some sort of underdog in the comp. Elegance may still be the 'same thing' it has been for decades, but it's still highly subjective. I find it more dumbfounding the way some are giving 1s and 2s simply because you can't see the front of an outfit. Does the back count for nothing? Is that still taking the hair, makeup, etc into consideration?

Thanks Pretty Found some HQs of her on Bare Necessities, but they cut her head off :persuazn:

17. Sienna Miller 18. 19. Jennifer Connelly 20. Mary Elizabeth Winstead 21. Eva Green 22. Marion Cotillard 23. Natalie Martinez 24.

Charlize Theron [1] Renata Sozzi [5] Leticia Zuloaga [5] Keira Knightley [0] Anna Christine Speckhart [0] Mila Kunis [1]

Not really. Seemed more of a reaction against more than one person's scores. Bit of an arrogant thing to say though, regardless of who it was directed at <_<

I was being objective. I've seen her before, and heard the name here and there, but I really have no idea who she is or why she's famous. Don't really have an opinion about her one way or the other

Kate Beckinsale x 5 Irina Shayk x 4, Penelope Cruz x 1 Emanuela de Paula x 5 Behati Prinsloo x 5