A little late, but as I promised @Jade Bahr
Well, it doesn't reach the original, but still far from bad. This is like a more blockbusterish remake of the original, where the emphasis was on action rather than plot and philosophy. Absolutely unnecessary, yet enjoyable. @Cult Icon
Pros:
1. It was entertaining. I didn't feel like it was going on for 2.5 hours.
2. The visuals are fine enough. There are some obvious CGI, but in general everything looks "real".
3. No bad acting.
4. Denzel Washington is magnificent. Total show stealer.
5. Paul Mescal is beautiful and so fcking hot + a lot of shirtless sweaty muscular men (including Mr. Mescal himself).
6. Great fights.
Cons:
1. A weaker plot and dialogues.
2. Paul was great overall, but he lacked the intensity of Russell Crowe. And maybe rage? Also, his character, as well as all the characters except Denzel's, were underwritten and underdeveloped.
Overall, I liked it. Although I didn't have high expectations. This is a good action movie, especially compared to conveyor action movies overusing CGI. I understand the disappointment in Gladiator II, but harsh criticism is not justified imo.