OriginalSin

Diet Pepsi.

19. Favorite cartoon character: "Daffy Duck (as long as it's old school, Chuck Jones Daffy)" <<< SAME HERE! omg I think I love you Herve

Don't worry, in my experience that feeling doesn't tend to last very long with most people, you'll be fine!

Daffy rules, though. I hate what WB did to him and the rest of the Looney Tunes characters, they are going to kill whatever little there is left of his soul with this:

Daffy is suppose to be the third from the right side.

I know Daffy Duck. And you Sir, are no Daffy Duck!

omg my Mom told me about that show...she's like they turned all the Looney Tunes characters into evil scary beings :| I quote agree.

I think Sasha shouldn't be there I would never think she wll be a next supermodel Gemma has a beautiful alien look to replace her, and I think they only put Chanel for racial diversity and I think they are right because I can't think of any other black model doing so many shows lately

But I loved to see Raquel, Trentini, Doutzen, Lily and Stammy there I don't like Coco but I think she deserves to be in there

Sort of a minor point, but the cover doesn't say next SUPERmodels. It says next top models, a category Sasha definitely fits into. She may look like a scary version of Gemma Ward but she's actually a GOOD model in terms of posing and expression, she's Prada exclusive and has been for a while, she's been on 2 Vogue Italia covers in just the last four months (not to mention any of her other covers in the past few seasons), she's been in plenty of editorials, she's got a cosmetics contract with Giorgio Armani, she did 60 shows in the FW07 season, and plenty of shows in previous seasons. There's absolutely no question that she deserves that cover. In the fashion industry, she is definitely one of the tops. Whether or not she has commercial appeal is a different story, but I'm fairly certain that's not what determined most of these girls making the cover.

You should probably post a picture so people know what you're talking about

Secondly, you have the year wrong, but I'll fix that

As for the cover itself, all the choices make sense except Chanel. Freja is missing - it's so glaringly obvious it's painful. I can't stand the girl but she deserves to be on the cover. If you look at it from the perspective of those who have had the most editorials, covers, ad campaigns, runway shows in recent seasons and look at the caliber of those edits, ads, shows, etc. all those girls deserve to be there except Chanel.

Eugenia had her shot in 2004. She should've been there but was pulled for whatever reason. I don't think she deserves to be there now though it would've been nice I suppose.

Oh and if they were going for racial diversity, but someone who actually deserves it as well, I don't think Pei Bei would have been a good choice...at all, definitely not any better than Chanel Iman :|

I wonder if anyone could change the mine to Fair131 Thank you

done

1. because it's hot

2. Boyd Holbrook + Julia Dunstall

3. Usually when I get tired of it but I don't know, I may never change this one

I see. Well uhh...

yeah...nice of you to bring that up...a year and 4 months later

:|

Uhh, thanks for sharing?

done.

I'm probably the only person in the world who has never read a Harry potter book. :|

haha nope I haven't either.

And I'd like to keep it that way :|

^ haha I was thinking the same thing

Not a big deal, but if anyone wants to request emoticons, you can do so here:

http://www.bellazon.com/main/Emoticons-Defined-t3493.html

Try to choose ones that match the IPB emoticon theme (because we like our emoticons to look as similar as possible though we have made exceptions in the past). And know that we may not honor all requests, but it doesn't hurt to ask

I'll change kill to voodoo since that's what's going on in that pic

ETA: done. :voodoo:

I'm not beating you with an ugly stick :| I think you've suffered enough.

go stir shit somewhere else Ed

Oh you mean this one?

hmm like this?

Good point *sits back and does nothing*

whoa :| That's odd.

Is anything else not working for you or just the emoticons? Also can you see the emoticons in this message or not?

I'm happy that I will be graduating soon even though I have no idea what I'm going to do with the rest of my life

^hmm I got that error a little while ago...but it didn't last long

haha you know I am capable of adding emoticons right? :|

I liked mbinebri's comment better :morning:

me too, I love you red_lady

Hmm I remember back in the days when we could delete accounts. I had two accounts by accident a year ago and I got Neo to delete one of them because I asked him to. I only made a second account (this one) because I forgot the name of the first and it's password, until I came across it again when reading through some old pages of a thread.

ah yes! the good old days right?

Yes! thank you Pink.

where's the emoticon that bangs its head against the wall when you need it?

Where's the intelligence option? Or do brains not matter?

yeah seriously

Where's the intelligence option? Or do brains not matter?

Sure brains matter. But seriously, you wouldn't go with a guy just cuz "he's so smart" or "he's the reincarnation of einstein." I wouldn't do that to myself: imagine going with a guy who has twice your brain capacity (in my case a neutron)? I am annoyed by dumb guys but in this scenario I'd be the dumb one in comparisation and that would freak me out at one point.

Besides, there's not much about brains when he doesn't have the rest. I knew someone like that once. He was so intelligent; best of our class and he prolly went to the university straight after school. But he was SO boring.

Talking about black holes in the universe that fascinated him because *insert load of difficult words here* and more stuff along those lines. He thought math was the easiest thing ever. Yet he couldn't socialize.

Um but you can say the same thing about most of these qualities can't you? Going out with a guy "just cuz 'he's so smart'" is no different from going out with a guy "just cuz he's hot."

Just to clarify, I think your argument makes sense...for YOU. I'm not arguing for or against your personal opinion on the matter of intelligence in a guy. I just don't think it's necessarily a reason for not including intelligence in this poll