Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

This is a huge file (40 MBs) and a raw UHQ scan, so you can see every dot.  It's worth it since it's a very rare image.  It only appeared as an ad in one or two magazines.  I don't care about scanner credit, but yeah, these are my scans.  A subtle gaussian blur applied would make it look better on a computer monitor (avoids moire patterns), but the original file could be printed into a giant poster and would still look great.

 

Scan-150702-0001.jpg

Probably the same photo shoot as the previous image, same huge size and raw scan.  Came from a 1992 catalog.  Scan was 400 dpi minimum, and maybe even 600 dpi.

 

Scan-150628-0033.jpg

Great scans slacker, much appreciated.

On 10/11/2016 at 1:14 PM, brazilianaffair said:

for Estee Lauder, 2015, by Mario Sorrenti

my scan

20161110130928_001_e0.jpg

same, my scan

20161122102804_001.jpg

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.