Jump to content
Bellazon

Anastasiya Scheglova
Thumbnail


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, VS19 said:

She just keeps getting better and better.  Set 2 might represent some of the best work that she has done thus far, which is saying something. :D:smile: 

 

Yah, Set 2 is my fave' also, at least in those/that sessions. She absolutely stunning in pic 3 (Set 2). They had put a few a year ago on 500px but I was happy there were much more and in higher res'. Many have a lot of dead space but it's also practical if someone wants to do a vertical or horizontal wallpaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, neurovibe said:

 

Yah, Set 2 is my fave' also, at least in those/that sessions. She absolutely stunning in pic 3 (Set 2). They had put a few a year ago on 500px but I was happy there were much more and in higher res'. Many have a lot of dead space but it's also practical if someone wants to do a vertical or horizontal wallpaper.

 

That's exactly what I was thinking.  Nothing wrong with a bit of so-called dead space.  If it's not to someone's liking, they can always crop it out. :D  Makes for some good wallpaper choices for everyone else, though. :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VS19 said:

 

That's exactly what I was thinking.  Nothing wrong with a bit of so-called dead space.  If it's not to someone's liking, they can always crop it out. :D  Makes for some good wallpaper choices for everyone else, though. :D 

 

Indeed! And at that res', even cropping keeps you above 2000px.

 

By the way, I just checked out @wndmkr tumblr to be sure I'm not going to post dups but I'm pretty sure most of them (upcoming) are new, plus a lot of the exif "date taken" timestamps indicate they were taken in February of this year. Not ultra high-res (those are rare) but fairly good (around 2000px) of new lingerie shots, I just got to finish scraping the site, probably be done by tomorrow max :smile: Also, sometimes high res' doesn't equal great quality, like 67 Kb for 2000px is poor, and although filesize is not the only clue (some can be resampled), I zoomed in and they are fairly mighty decent! I'll keep you guys posted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...