May 25May 25 Nadja Auermann for Vivienne Westwood, ready-to-wear, fall/winter 1994, also showing Helena Christensen, Kate Moss, Christy Turlington, Helena Barquilla & Eva Herzigovamy scans
Sunday at 11:24 PM5 days Nadja Auermann for Vivienne Westwood, ready-to-wear, spring/summer 1995, also showing Linda Evangelista, Amber Valletta, Eva Herzigova & unknownmy scans
Yesterday at 10:05 AM1 day Nadja Auermann for Vivienne Westwood, ready-to-wear, fall/winter 1995, also showing Helena Barquilla & Amber Vallettamy scans
Yesterday at 01:30 PM1 day On 5/26/2025 at 12:24 AM, ser_franklin said:& unknownPretty sure she is Simonetta Gianfelici 🙂
Yesterday at 01:33 PM1 day 2 minutes ago, ArianaVSCouture said:Pretty sure she is Simonetta Gianfelici 🙂She is indeed. There were almost no unknowns in the Vivienne shows during those times🤣🤣
22 hours ago22 hr 5 hours ago, radolgc said:She is indeed. There were almost no unknowns in the Vivienne shows during those times🤣🤣Well, anybody can be "unknown" to someone if they don't actually know them or recognize them for whatever reason, I'm not a fashion historian, and don't know every single name, not to mention I'm very bad with names to begin with. Plus Vivienne Westwood was putting so much makeup on their faces that it made it even harder. But I do know Simonetta and recognize her now.
22 hours ago22 hr 5 hours ago, ArianaVSCouture said:Pretty sure she is Simonetta Gianfelici 🙂Thank you 😉
22 hours ago22 hr 7 minutes ago, ser_franklin said:Well, anybody can be "unknown" to someone if they don't actually know them or recognize them for whatever reason, I'm not a fashion historian, and don't know every single name, not to mention I'm very bad with names to begin with. Plus Vivienne Westwood was putting so much makeup on their faces that it made it even harder. But I do know Simonetta and recognize her now.That is correct. But you don't need to be a fashion historian to know the faces of the biggest models of the best years in fashion. You need to be a model fanatic which most of us are:). However we do not need to know the name of every model out there. For me we do not even have to mention the names of the other models here, but consentrate mostly on Nadja, the model to which this thread is dedicated to. And most of us know the names of all models any way.
22 hours ago22 hr 4 minutes ago, radolgc said:That is correct. But you don't need to be a fashion historian to know the faces of the biggest models of the best years in fashion. You need to be a model fanatic which most of us are:). However we do not need to know the name of every model out there. For me we do not even have to mention the names of the other models here, but consentrate mostly on Nadja, the model to which this thread is dedicated to. And most of us know the names of all models any way.I will mention who I recognize and not mention who I don't, and if anyone like Ariana feels like IDing or correcting, that's what they're going to do and they are welcome to, and whoever don't feel like doing that, they won't, it's that simple.
22 hours ago22 hr 10 minutes ago, ser_franklin said:I will mention who I recognize and not mention who I don't, and if anyone like Ariana feels like IDing or correcting, that's what they're going to do and they are welcome to, and whoever don't feel like doing that, they won't, it's that simple.Well, of course it is that simple. I was simply expressing my opinion and tried to put some logic into it. In my opinion there is no need to mention names of other models if a thread is dedicated to one model! Again, the members here are well aware of most model names and such mentionings imo are pretty annoying as if we are retarded...lol. I hope you understand my point.
21 hours ago21 hr 7 minutes ago, radolgc said:Well, of course it is that simple. I was simply expressing my opinion and tried to put some logic into it. In my opinion there is no need to mention names of other models if a thread is dedicated to one model! Again, the members here are well aware of most model names and such mentionings imo are pretty annoying as if we are retarded...lol. I hope you understand my point.Damn, if you get annoyed by the mention of a few names my dear, yikes, I don't know what to tell you! 😬 Plus nobody is forcing you to read the text, since you are so knowledgeable just look at the pictures and move on. And lastly, you always seem to speak for everybody, but there could be new members who have just subscribed, who are not as knowledgeable as you on the topic and are curious to learn, and it could be useful to them to learn about a model they didn't know about. You keep on posting what you want the way you prefer to and keep it pushing.
21 hours ago21 hr 32 minutes ago, ser_franklin said:Damn, if you get annoyed by the mention of a few names my dear, yikes, I don't know what to tell you! 😬 Plus nobody is forcing you to read the text, since you are so knowledgeable just look at the pictures and move on. And lastly, you always seem to speak for everybody, but there could be new members who have just subscribed, who are not as knowledgeable as you on the topic and are curious to learn, and it could be useful to them to learn about a model they didn't know about. You keep on posting what you want the way you prefer to and keep it pushing.Wow, that was quite rude. So, please, do not tell me what to read and not to read, cause you are just stepping over the limit here. I will do whatever i like and i will express my opinion as much as i like. You better ignore my comments if you have an issue with what i am saying, OK! Damn, model fans can be so unpleasant to comminicate with. And no, there are no new people who are interested to learn a name of a model from the 80's or 90's. And how will they do it any way if you describe them as unknowns...lol...This is a Nadja Auermann thread, not a school for fashion knowledge!!!
21 hours ago21 hr 6 minutes ago, radolgc said:Wow, that was quite rude. So, please, do not tell me what to read and not to read, cause you are just stepping over the limit here. I will do whatever i like and i will express my opinion as much as i like. You better ignore my comments if you have an issue with what i am saying, OK! Damn, model fans can be so unpleasant to comminicate with. And no, there are no new people who are interested to learn a name of a model from the 80's or 90's. And how will they do it any way if you describe them as unknowns...lol...This is a Nadja Auermann thread, not a school for fashion knowledge!!!Oh, there are no new people interested in learning!? Ok, if you say so, Mr Knowitall! 😂 Good grief. I've always ignored your comments sir, you've always inserted yourself in mine. And whoever wants to learn about models that they don't know about can do so thanks to people like Ariana who kindly chimes in and let everyone know. If nobody wanted to know who was in the pictures or scans the MODEL ID thread wouldn't even exist. Please go ahead and take your own advice and ignore MY posts.
20 hours ago20 hr Nadja Auermann for Vivienne Westwood, ready-to-wear, spring/summer 1996, also showing Kristen McMenamymy scans
11 hours ago11 hr 9 hours ago, ser_franklin said:Oh, there are no new people interested in learning!? Ok, if you say so, Mr Knowitall! 😂 Good grief. I've always ignored your comments sir, you've always inserted yourself in mine. And whoever wants to learn about models that they don't know about can do so thanks to people like Ariana who kindly chimes in and let everyone know. If nobody wanted to know who was in the pictures or scans the MODEL ID thread wouldn't even exist. Please go ahead and take your own advice and ignore MY posts.I WILL GLADLY DO SO...LOLOLOLOLOL. YUK
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.