Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

More Gemma. :heart: Funnyfan posted the first pic a while back, but there were two more in the set. I'll just post all three.

Hermes 2005

gemma54wk.th.jpggemma60su.th.jpggemma78hv.th.jpg

Yeah, that kind of sucks. I wish more people would participate in not only this thread, but the entire models section.

Is it just me, or does she look 15? She's pretty, I just have trouble thinking she's sexy, she just looks too young. :ninja:

she looks 12 years old.

quite frankly, i just DON'T see the appeal.

i find WOMEN faaaarrrr more interesting than young, prepubescent looking girls.

she looks 12 years old.

quite frankly, i just DON'T see the appeal.

i find WOMEN faaaarrrr more interesting than young, prepubescent looking girls.

I think she is lovely. Sexy? No. Beautiful? Yes.

I agree that she looks very young, but she is beautiful regardless. I wouldn't like to see her in Victoria's Secret ( much like Susan Eldridge ) because she simply looks so young.

Gemma is very pretty, but there is no sexual appeal.

  • 2 weeks later...

Did a fast glance through and didn't see these, so here's an Editorial from the March 2005 issue of US Vogue:

post-326-1112671823_thumb.jpg post-326-1112672103_thumb.jpg post-326-1112672156_thumb.jpg post-326-1112672169_thumb.jpg

post-326-1112672184_thumb.jpg post-326-1112672215_thumb.jpg post-326-1112672227_thumb.jpg

Want to make a note that most of these were two pagers, but I only did the pages that Gemma was on

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.