December 10, 200519 yr Hey There--all of you LISTEN UP--MODERATORS ALERT theses numero shots are not repeat ARE NOT of Michelle---please note carefully---- THESE ARE NOT MICHELLE From Numero....Links contain nudity and red eyes! I don't like this ed, but I figured somebody here would! http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b394/pur...ff111/mb001.jpg http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b394/pur...ff111/mb002.jpg http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b394/pur...ff111/mb003.jpg http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b394/pur...ff111/mb004.jpg http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b394/pur...ff111/mb005.jpg Thanks to herfamedgoodlooks.com
December 11, 200519 yr ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle. One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr ATTENTION MODERATORS---URGENT THIS PERSON HAS POSTED LIBELLOUS AND SLANDEROUS PICTURES WHICH SHE PURPORTS, STRENUOSLY, TO BE OF MICHELLE BUSWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE LICENTIOUS, PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OF MICHELLE. THESE THINGS MUST BE TAKEN DOWN AT ONCE AND THE SUBMITTER OF THESE LYING ATROCITIES SUITABLY CHASTIZED. tHANK yOU, CLAUDIA (Claudia)M ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle.One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr PURPLE---- THIS IS A MALICIOUS, VENOMOUS LIE!!!!!! ANY FOOL CAN SEE THAT THESE ATROCITIES ARE NOT OF MICHELLE. WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR EVIL AGENDA? CLAUDIA ATTENTION MODERATORS---URGENTTHIS PERSON HAS POSTED LIBELLOUS AND SLANDEROUS PICTURES WHICH SHE PURPORTS, STRENUOSLY, TO BE OF MICHELLE BUSWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE LICENTIOUS, PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OF MICHELLE. THESE THINGS MUST BE TAKEN DOWN AT ONCE AND THE SUBMITTER OF THESE LYING ATROCITIES SUITABLY CHASTIZED. tHANK yOU, CLAUDIA (Claudia)M ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle. One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr First of all ClaudiaM, please learn where Caps Lock is located and turn it off.Second I'm siding with purple on this one, just becasue you dont like the pictures and think there pornographic or whatever, doesnt mean that it is not her. Also if the agency has the pictures on there site, its a pretty good indication that it probabaly is her.
December 11, 200519 yr FIRST OF ALL MADDOG, FIND OUT WHERE THE "BRAINSLOCK" IS LOCATED IN YOUR HEAD AND TURN IT ON. HOW BORING, MEANINGLESS AND IGNORANT IT IS ON "WHICH SIDE" YOU ARE ON--CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT THIS PERSON HAS ENGAGED IN A VICIOSLY LYING CAMPAIN TO DISCREDIUT A VERY NICE HARDWORKING GIRL. IT IS A DISGUSTING ATTEMPT TO HURT HER. AND PLEASE, SIR, NEXT TIME YOU DECIDE TO "TAKE SIDES"--DO YOUR HOMEWORK---THOSE FILTHY THINGS WHICH SHE SAYS SO FALSELY ARE OF MICHELLE AND WHICH SHE IDENTIFIES AS "COMING FROM HER AGENT" HER AGENT ANGRILY AND VEHEMENTLY DENIED THIS--THEY RECOGNIZED ONLY ONE OF THESE ATROCITIES, THE ONE WHICH IS NOT FULLY UNCLOTHED---- LAST TIME -- MODERATORS! GET INTO THIS ATROCIOUS SITUATION--THIS PERSON IS PUBLISHING PORNOGRAPHY AND LYINGLY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO A FINE YOUNG GIRL. SHAME ON HER! LETS GET GOING MODERATORS... CLAUDIA PURPLE----THIS IS A MALICIOUS, VENOMOUS LIE!!!!!! ANY FOOL CAN SEE THAT THESE ATROCITIES ARE NOT OF MICHELLE. WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR EVIL AGENDA? CLAUDIA ATTENTION MODERATORS---URGENT THIS PERSON HAS POSTED LIBELLOUS AND SLANDEROUS PICTURES WHICH SHE PURPORTS, STRENUOSLY, TO BE OF MICHELLE BUSWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE LICENTIOUS, PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OF MICHELLE. THESE THINGS MUST BE TAKEN DOWN AT ONCE AND THE SUBMITTER OF THESE LYING ATROCITIES SUITABLY CHASTIZED. tHANK yOU, CLAUDIA (Claudia)M ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle. One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr Well, I'm no mod, so I'm powerless here. I can, however, delete psycopaths from the list of people allowed access to my site. Hope you got everything you wanted, Ms. ClaudiaM. Because raging lunatics who yell without any sense of logic at people I like, Maddog and purple, really don't go over to well with me.
December 11, 200519 yr LETS GET GOING MODERATORS...Mabye you dont know the hierarchy of power in terms of editing and final says.First come the Admins (notice I am one of them), then come the Mods (the people you are urging to edit the posts).I have voted to keep the pictures, and they will stay until you can provide us with some conclusive evidence that it is not her, for example if you can tell us that it really is (insert name here) pictures, or something along those lines. Thanks.Also find it hard to belive that it is not a set since there are so many similarities between the pictures, like the pic on Storms site and the last pic postedhttp://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b394/pur...ff111/mb005.jpgShoes are the same and so is hairstyle, also there is another pic with same phone, and little details like that.
December 11, 200519 yr First, I'd like to thank the great people at bellazon.com for treating me with kindness.I have no problem verifying the source of every photo I post here. If bellazon thinks I have posted something that is not appropriate, I will not argue if it's taken down. The photos I posted of Michelle were verified by two of her agencies, Storm in London and Marilyn in NYC. I posted them for the fans of Michelle. They were scanned by herfamedgoodlooks.com, and they should get complete credit for the photos. The photos are from Numero magazine. I don't post photos that don't have a source I can't verify. If the person in question is so upset, I have no problem finding a copy of Numero magazine with Michelle and mailing it to her. Numero is a fashion magazine - many fashion magazines feature nudity. What nudity has to do with fashion, I don't know! However, I post photos for Michelle fans. Second, Michelle has various photos of her in the nude. If you don't believe me, look at last year's Pirelli calender. There are two shots of her where her chest is showing. Her agency photos have nudity. Storm - Londonhttp://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454Marilyn - NYC and Parishttp://www.marylinagency.comWomen - Milanhttp://www.womenmanagement.com/Both Storm and Women feature a photo from the series I posted. Therefore, it's quite positive that the photos are Michelle. If anybody has a problem with anything I post, I prefer it be taken to private message next time, unless it's a mod or admin.But anyway, because there was issues taken to the photos, I deleted them. I don't come to bellazon to offend people or make enemies. I still stand firm in my conviction that the photos are Michelle, but I took them down for the obvious reason that somebody got offended. That was not my intent. I don't have an "agenda" here. Please don't attack me again unless you have a VALID reason to do so. I don't even know you - you have no right to attack me in a public forum with no justification or evidence. How rude. I apologize to the mods, admins, and friends at bellazon.com for causing such problems.
December 11, 200519 yr LISTEN CAREFULLY THE AGENCY VEHEMENTLY DENIES THAT THESE ARE HER PICTURES. THEY ARE NOT ON THEIR SITE. THIS PERSON HAS LIED. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW? THE ONLY PICTURE THEY HAVE IS THE ONE NOT FULLY NUDE......NOW GET SMART ARE YOU PART OF THIS DISGUSTING CONSPIRACY? sOUNDS LIKE IT. IF NOT, GET BUSY AND TELL THOSE MODERATORS TO GET THEM DOWN QUICKLY--THERE MAY WELL BE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS. PURPLE----THIS IS A MALICIOUS, VENOMOUS LIE!!!!!! ANY FOOL CAN SEE THAT THESE ATROCITIES ARE NOT OF MICHELLE. WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR EVIL AGENDA? CLAUDIA ATTENTION MODERATORS---URGENT THIS PERSON HAS POSTED LIBELLOUS AND SLANDEROUS PICTURES WHICH SHE PURPORTS, STRENUOSLY, TO BE OF MICHELLE BUSWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE LICENTIOUS, PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OF MICHELLE. THESE THINGS MUST BE TAKEN DOWN AT ONCE AND THE SUBMITTER OF THESE LYING ATROCITIES SUITABLY CHASTIZED. tHANK yOU, CLAUDIA (Claudia)M ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle. One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr TO PURPLE I HAVE SPOKEN WITH THIS AGENCY IN LONDON. THEY ARE FAR ANGRIER THAN I AM ABOUT THIS VERY VICIOUS LIE! THESE ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT HER PICTURTES, AS YOU WELL KNOW. WHAT OUTRAGEOUS BEHAVIOUR MISS PURPLE, WHOEVER YOU ARE---THIS IS A SHAMEFUL ACT!!!!!! LISTEN CAREFULLYTHE AGENCY VEHEMENTLY DENIES THAT THESE ARE HER PICTURES. THEY ARE NOT ON THEIR SITE. THIS PERSON HAS LIED. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW? THE ONLY PICTURE THEY HAVE IS THE ONE NOT FULLY NUDE......NOW GET SMART ARE YOU PART OF THIS DISGUSTING CONSPIRACY? sOUNDS LIKE IT. IF NOT, GET BUSY AND TELL THOSE MODERATORS TO GET THEM DOWN QUICKLY--THERE MAY WELL BE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS. PURPLE---- THIS IS A MALICIOUS, VENOMOUS LIE!!!!!! ANY FOOL CAN SEE THAT THESE ATROCITIES ARE NOT OF MICHELLE. WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR EVIL AGENDA? CLAUDIA ATTENTION MODERATORS---URGENT THIS PERSON HAS POSTED LIBELLOUS AND SLANDEROUS PICTURES WHICH SHE PURPORTS, STRENUOSLY, TO BE OF MICHELLE BUSWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE LICENTIOUS, PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OF MICHELLE. THESE THINGS MUST BE TAKEN DOWN AT ONCE AND THE SUBMITTER OF THESE LYING ATROCITIES SUITABLY CHASTIZED. tHANK yOU, CLAUDIA (Claudia)M ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle. One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr TO PURPLE------ I JUST HUNG UP WITH THE MARILYN AGENCY--THEYT ARE FURIOUS . THE DAMN AS COMPLETELY FALSE AND MALICIOUS YOUR CLAIM THAT AND i QUOTE ... They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn GET WITH IT--WITHDRAW THESE THINGS OR WAIT TIL WHAT HAPPENS NEXT--IN ANY EVENT, IF YOU HAVE A CONSCIENCE, WHICH I DOUBT, IT WILL BURN YOU THE REST OIF YOUR LIFE FOR ACTING SO RECKLESSLY TO INJURE A NICE YOUNG GIRL WHO YOU DONT EVEN KNOW!!!!I HAVE SPOKEN WITH THIS AGENCY IN LONDON. THEY ARE FAR ANGRIER THAN I AM ABOUT THIS VERY VICIOUS LIE! THESE ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT HER PICTURTES, AS YOU WELL KNOW. WHAT OUTRAGEOUS BEHAVIOUR MISS PURPLE, WHOEVER YOU ARE---THIS IS A SHAMEFUL ACT!!!!!! LISTEN CAREFULLY THE AGENCY VEHEMENTLY DENIES THAT THESE ARE HER PICTURES. THEY ARE NOT ON THEIR SITE. THIS PERSON HAS LIED. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW? THE ONLY PICTURE THEY HAVE IS THE ONE NOT FULLY NUDE......NOW GET SMART ARE YOU PART OF THIS DISGUSTING CONSPIRACY? sOUNDS LIKE IT. IF NOT, GET BUSY AND TELL THOSE MODERATORS TO GET THEM DOWN QUICKLY--THERE MAY WELL BE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS. PURPLE---- THIS IS A MALICIOUS, VENOMOUS LIE!!!!!! ANY FOOL CAN SEE THAT THESE ATROCITIES ARE NOT OF MICHELLE. WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR EVIL AGENDA? CLAUDIA ATTENTION MODERATORS---URGENT THIS PERSON HAS POSTED LIBELLOUS AND SLANDEROUS PICTURES WHICH SHE PURPORTS, STRENUOSLY, TO BE OF MICHELLE BUSWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE LICENTIOUS, PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT OF MICHELLE. THESE THINGS MUST BE TAKEN DOWN AT ONCE AND THE SUBMITTER OF THESE LYING ATROCITIES SUITABLY CHASTIZED. tHANK yOU, CLAUDIA (Claudia)M ClaudiaM, those photos ARE Michelle. One of the photos is currently featured at her London agency, Storm. http://www.stormmodels.com/womendetails.html?id=2454 They were previously featured at her NYC agency, Marilyn. I can back up my claims. Don't attack one of my posts without doing the same. The photos are originally from herfamedgoodlooks.com Why don't you send your accusation to the source of the scans? The owner of the website also correctly identified the photos as Michelle. Don't forget to inform her agency in London that they can't identify their own model.
December 11, 200519 yr I edited the photos. Sorry for any confusion. Edited December 13, 200519 yr by purple
December 12, 200519 yr You should definitely repost those pictures so that I can see them, now that I've been attracted to this thread.
December 13, 200519 yr Here you go capt. May contain nudity Credit: Herfamedgoodlooks http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/3876/mb0014xh.jpg http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/4979/mb0026hg.jpg http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/9696/mb0038ym.jpg http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/9624/mb0048bs.jpg http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/424/mb0056qn.jpg
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.