Jump to content
Bellazon

Enrico_sw

Members
  • Posts

    36,777
  • Joined

Posts posted by Enrico_sw

  1. On 9/1/2023 at 9:09 PM, Cult Icon said:

    There seems to be some fallout- no pun intended about this game being overhyped.  So far it looks like fallout in space and not a super game. 

    PAgTYtM.png

    The game was in development for 8 years, used a large staff in the hundreds and had a 9 figure dollar cost.  I am looking at the footage of the whole game and I'm not seeing evidence of such efforts.  It's a good game but it is limited in scope.  

     

    I really like the whole NASA-inspired art direction though.

     

    Overall, it seems like corporate inefficiency due to the franchise running on its brand equity.  A lot of manpower, money and time used and the result was a much smaller game than expected.

     

    I love the concept as well and the game seems pretty good.

     

    However, it doesn't seem to be the great breakthrough they expected.

     

    At least, they didn't completely screw things up like for Fallout 76, so I'd call that a great victory for them :rofl:

  2. On 9/1/2023 at 5:52 PM, Cult Icon said:

    Funny, it's the future and they are still using libraries : D

     

     Bethesda should update the human animations in their engine.  They still have a robotic appearance and don't seem like real people.

     

    Overall this looks a lot like Fallout 4 in space.

     

     

     

     

    Bethesda uses its own engine called the "Creation engine". It's a very bad engine (they used it for Fallout 4 and 76, it was already below the market). Starfield's version is the upgraded one (CE 2), but it still seems to be average.

     

    They're too proud to use third parties engine.... typical Bethesda :laugh:

×
×
  • Create New...