fl7la4

The intention is to explore a quiet side of fashion-opinions. hate produces a giant mess of everything so that is not intended. just a neutral "lighting was bad", "makeup was bad" etc is what is expected. i guess the purpose is to nudge the technical people into the right direction if they ever come across these comments. remember the info of photog, artist, brand, year etc.

it is just weird that some unfortunate pics are published by high-end mags and brands. every now and then there is this expensive photoshoot that produces ...eek-pictures...but which technical aspects went wrong? why do we not call out a mess for being a mess, instead of just viewing brands as good regardless of what the model/picture representation actually is, which can be... not beautiful at all after a second look.

Numero 2012 Ginta Lapina Santiago & Mauricio Sierra (Photographer) Elizabeth Sulcer (Fashion Editor/Stylist) Diego Da Silva (Hair Stylist) Francelle Daly (Makeup Artist) Cesar Leon (Producer) Maki Sakamoto (Manicurist)

Dont remember the company / model esprit/armani or something like that 2012 the lighting must have been an issue......

ugly pics of models happen when the photographer is incompetent, the lighting is bad, the makeup is bad etc we all know of photos that look....ugly, for whatever makeup/photographer etc reason Think vogue, inverview, gucci, DG, etc. post examples of those here. NOTE only high fashion pics no backyard / selftaken or other nonprofessional pics. be neutral do not ridicule