Everything posted by jewels007
-
Katja Shchekina
I don't frequent her thread that much if at all. Hopefully, these aren't reposts. I quickly skimmed through her thread and don't think i saw them. Some backstage/make up portrait shots.
-
Runway
You guy and gals are very welcome! I hope the info on this is right, please correct if it's wrong London Fashion Week Arkadius Spring/Summer 2004 September 20, 2003 THE BELOW PICTURES CONTAIN NUDITY AND HAVE THEREFORE BEEN TEXT LINKED http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/3663/ar...ushqnu06pf0.jpg http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/7350/ar...ushqnu01vi2.jpg http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/1527/ar...ushqnu03sc9.jpg http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/3673/ar...ushqnu04gf4.jpg http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/3041/ar...ushqnu05of7.jpg
-
Candids
Thanks Rumor and Nata. Sorry if these are reposts, i think i saw one, can't remember which one, but that was way back so big sorry if they were all already posted. Elefant Video Shoot - Dec. 10, 2003 NYC
- Fendi Spring 2007
- Fendi Spring 2007
-
Fendi Spring 2007
-
Candids
-
Candids
-
Candids
those above pics from vs are reposts, there's a tag that says bellazon on them, just sayin' as originalsin has asked us to try cutdown on the reposts. anywhoo... an hq pic: Nascar Nextel Cup Series Champion
-
Candids
-
Candids
On the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Ring the closing bell and participate in the lighting of the 83rd annual NYSE Christmas Tree. Monday Dec. 4, 2006 HQ This one wouldn't attach for the life of me, so it's on imageshack
-
Candids
seeing this skirt and then seeing your comments made me think of something i saw a little while ago. see the attached scan.
-
Candids
A bunch of Mq's. HQ's later on if none get posted.
-
Candids
Not sure if this is a reposts or have been seen in some fashion..sorry if they have. Also not sure if this is the right place for them, probably should go in editorials, right? A photoshoot that is supposedly from 2006
-
Candids
i love when people try to close threads or sign off on a subject when they've misunderstood what i said. It's not a who is better poster thing at all and i never said anyone's else's posts weren't welcomed, of course they are however when the MOD makes a personal thread with a sticky that requests people to not reposts photos then i thought i would say something. When a photo is hq in size that is 1800 and another that is 1812 by width or 2000 by width i don't think it's necessary to repost it right after on the same page. I also was only talking about 8 of the photos not all. I'm sure i and other appreciated the other photos as i said that. How that constitutes better or whatever you said is beyond me, i couldn't fully understand what you were sayin' anyways. I purposely have left new photos off this board in fact some that have surfaced recently thinking others would like to post if they have them etc, i didn't want to "rain on anyone's parade". So i've sorta been posting older pics. I don't want to detour anyone from posting and implying that i am is ridiculous and frankly unwarranted. I can understand if photos are double in size and or are better quality or come untagged which was previously tagged, but when the photos are indeed not that much bigger i think it's useless to reposts based on a mod's request to cut down on reposts and the fact that they aren't that bigger from what was already posted. I've debated with myself about reposting some smaller photos i had cause though i posted them before i have a slighty better quality and i'm not sure if it's worth it to repost. I'm not the mod or anyone that holds any statue here, I apologize for trying to adhere to request and speaking an opinion i thought where i was trying to be nice and diplomatic, however if it wasn't taken that way it wasn't what i was trying to imply.
-
Heidi Klum
I don't frequent her thread at all and there's too many pages to go back and look though i did awhile go try go through and i don't remember if these were posted, so sorry if reposts:
-
Candids
Prince Albert of Monaco and Petra
-
Candids
Unless i'm mistaken which i apologize, the pics aren't that much bigger, i downsize a lot of my pics sometimes to improve the quality and sometimes lessen the file size and I understand if mq's or tagged were posted, but that's just me, however i think the photos are infact the same size practcially, i posted was 1800 and you posted 1816 or whateverin some. Bigger doesn't necessarily mean better sometimes though, sometimes downsizing pics improves the quality. But in this case, 1800 and 1816 or a sligtly bigger isn't much bigger there's barely a difference. even 1800 and say 2000 width, they are both full hq's, but i know people like bigger no matter what. Anyways, I just thought they were the samish..lol, but i can see how the others would be posted as is cause they weren't posted at all. i just thought with original sins request it wasn't necessary, but i'm not the mod. I'm just trying to do my part with adhering to his request. But sometimes we do get much bigger like something double in size or untagged or whatever or something the same size but much better quality. But to each his own and i don't want to rain on anyone's parade or stop them from posting pics cause it's all appreciated or act prissy or get on anyone's nerves or act like i own this place or i make the rules. Not trying to make a big stiff out out of it though. I am trying to take a back step these days and not post the new stuff right away cause others do get them, so i'll continue to post the old stuff hopefully by new year i'll have most of what i got up and then that will probably be it for me. Anyways, regardless thanks for the pics!
-
Versace Spring/Summer 2005
- Versace Spring/Summer 2005
- Versace Spring/Summer 2005
- Runway
- Candids
Thanks nata, but 8 of those i just posted above, didn't bother with the rest cause couldn't really see her much, though that's beside the point, anywhoo, i was just saying. originalsin i think made a thread about trying to cut down on the reposting of images . Again i'm just letting you know about 8 of them were just posted right above. . Unless they are all different, in that case my bad, sorry! Anywhoo.. MTV's Fashionably Loud presents the 2002 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue- Candids
yeah i know. I do that from time to time for a couple different reasons. At this point in time i'm debating whether or not to continue to add photos to it, it's not the main reason it's offline. I will, if i plan to close it up leave it open for a period of time so people can save things if they haven't already, but right now i just don't know the fate of it. I will put it back online now though, but do expect to be offline again at some point.- Candids
- Versace Spring/Summer 2005