-
Posts
170 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Posts posted by cylnz
-
-
Monica Bellucci, various edits from today
I'm always looking for a digital (not a scan) UHQ version of the 'ass on a wall' pic below.
gallery: https://imgbox.com/g/SIeSYWMWUu
-
-
-
-
will check it out
It's pretty good, I'm about a third of the way through now.
-
I have to wonder at this campaign of "the original".
Certainly, Cindy Crawford was not remotely the original famous fashion model. Wouldn't that have to go to somebody like Jerry Hall or Cheryl Tiegs? Maybe Twiggy? I don't know, late '60s early '70s is a bit early for me in fashion models. When I started noticing them was Joan Severance and Andie MacDowell in the late '70s early '80s.
Cindy wasn't even the first of what would be the supermodels. Linda, Christy, Naomi, weren't they a year or so ahead of Cindy? In those days, I remember Cindy being rather a hanger on, instead of a member of the core group. That came later. I always thought of Cindy's place as after the Trinity, and before Claudia Schiffer. And if you're talking the Fab five that would be Linda, Christy, Naomi, Cindy, Tatjana.
So where is this "The original" thing coming from?
They can't say it's because Cindy did more nudity. She did more than Linda, much less and not nearly as good as Naomi, about the same as Christy and Tatjana. The other girls stayed more with high fashion while Cindy marketed to MTV.
Obviously, Cindy was my overwhelming favorite, but that's personal preference, and I never considered her the original fashion model or supermodel. Mostly, I think I always preferred Cindy because she seemed to be happy to be there. Cindy smiled a lot in her pictures. Something that her daughter Kaia seems adverse to. She always looks sulky and snotty. I don't need that. Smile, or at least have a happy expressive demeanor.
-
-
Wow. There is an imperial shit ton of this new AI editing crap on these. Look at the horrid mess they've made of her hands and feet. Would it be so horrible to just show Cindy as she is?
This new editing technology is only half baked and looks it. If they have to just do it the old fashioned way.
-
-
-
7 hours ago, Marijana said:
Well, son of a gun. That's why I keep doing this. Once in a great while I find a new picture that I have never seen before.
Thanks. What a great find. And even in decent quality.
I should have put in the title.
"Sante D´ Orazio
Cindy Crawford, Malibu - nude Model on the Beach, fine art photography, 1995"
-
The Cindy Doppler effect?
-
-
catalog could be from 87 but pics taken in 86.
-
2 hours ago, Doosia said:
https://t.me/supermodels90s/7108
https://t.me/supermodels90s/7126
https://t.me/supermodels90s/7090 Telegram channel about supermodels `90sWhy dont you just post them here?
-
Why; Thank You.
Those are great.
-
-
(Just an opinion)
This entire Vogue shoot is a real insult to the actual models who are fashion icons.
Cindy, Linda, Naomi, Kate, Christy, & Iman and a bunch of who gives a shit, fashion-wise people.
It's Vogue, not some political trash kitty litter liner rag. Cant they get a bunch of ACTUAL fashion icons?
-
-
-
Looks like Cindy got an eye lift. Looks very well done. Thankfully, she didnt get fish lips.
-
-
-
Cindy Crawford
in Female Fashion Models
Posted
dont know why folks bother to poster censored stuff, but here you go