cylnz

Very nice quality Andie pics.

pre-2002

old cd. Hirshleifer's adds

Lol, I've been looking for it for 25 years.

yes, but it's a horrid 240p quality. It's not that hard to find.

Salma Hayek is photographed for Latina Magazine in 1996
(Photo by Mike Ruiz/Contour)
good to exceptional quality
-

Salma Hayek - Latina Magazine in 1996

Paulina Porizkova & Kathy Ireland lingerie magazine article
(scroogly/tineye are too crap to tell me what magazine) gotta be 1984-85, pre SI.

Paulina Porizkova & Kathy Ireland lingerie magazine article

Blake Little 1990

1600X1583
watermarks removed

I believe from Max magazine

I spent some time searching on ya.ru today and put together these stitch-togethers.

I was originally looking for a better version of this pic below. I think it's from about 2002, it was on a 2006 CD.

Yep, been all thru his site, sadly the pic wasnt there. I went there about an hour after your post this morning.

Here is a much larger version I extracted from your pdf.

I'll cetainly start a search on gavin o'neil to see what I can find on him. Cant say I've ever heard of him before. Maybe fashiospot has a profile or something.

NUDITY !

Hi Max, yes I saw that FHM.

Who do you think it is?

You cant see her face, so yes, there is doubt.

nah, wrong hair.

I think it's Cindy, and until there's a lot better evidence than an incorrect date as an argument I'll stay that way. I think thats the end of the wall she's leaning against in all the bunny mag pics overlooking the ocean. It's a pic that was posted as her that I've had for almost 25 years and until now it's been so rare who can say. I know the surf nude isnt her, the credited pic proved that, I'll wait until someone finds real evidence on this one.

4 hours ago, jOEh said:

 

Not Cindy.  Check this out.

 

That would be ok, if I hadnt had the file since 2001. It was on my cd back up disc "C" April 4, 2001. Yes, in my websearch to find info about it, I did see the several (dead image link) posts about it. That post was made in 2005 about a pic that Max is saying was taken in 2009. I'm sure he and I will chat about it at some point, (we chat about odd Cindy stuff every 5-10 years or so.)  It's not up for debate as to whether I've had the photo since april of 2001. I have the physical media. That means the image is at least earlier than that date. Can we see her face? No, so, at this point, and given the photos rarity and unavailability, and Ritts being dead, unless we talk to Cindy . . .  It may not be her, but it IS a Ritts pic, and if it isnt Cindy, then it's Stephanie Seymour. I know it's a Ritts pic because it was in a Ritts art folder with other outtakes from the mexico bunny shoot on the C backup disc under Cindy's main folder.

So, no matter what, Max is wrong about the date. He says that a pic posted in 2005 (and I have on physical media from 2001), wasnt taken until 2009. Thanks for the tip, tho. Always nice to meet a Cindy fan.

Well, it took me a few years to find the original source pic from the wallpaper I posted, but here it is.

This pic has been posted here on bellazon a few times way back in 2005-7, but not a single link still works.

google say it was posted on page 11 of this thread in 2006

Jean-marc Augis
"Portrait of Cindy Crawford; Female portrait Circa 1989"

new stitch together.

Only 3 parts to this one

Supposedly this is Cindy.

Could be her in 1988 by Ritts. Don't know.

Apage full of goodness! Thank you danny-19 and ArianaVSCouture

posted to instagram last year about this time and then the second pic this passed weekend

I put the 2 pics together, but they dont use the same camera profile, so probably not taken at the same time, even though the plant is almost exactly the same, growth-wise

another magazine recolor edit

left side is the 90's mag scan priginal

right side is my adjustment

None of my work is done with AI or color tools like Topaz. Everything is done by hand with adjustment leyers

If you find my colors off, please let me know, I'm partially red/green colorblind and I even find different monitor profiles can make a difference in final appearance.