tmariss
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by tmariss
-
These are quite small. Can you tell us where they com from? Maybe it is possible to get bigger ones.
-
Looks to me like her. Open one of the tumbs images and replace the "mini" by "Zoom" to the full picture, for exmaple: "http://g-lvl3.nordstromimage.com/imagegallery/store/product/Zoom/16/_7218496.jpg"
-
Now if in the off chance you did nothing wrong then I would have no idea why you'd have a warning from me. I NEVER mark my warnings as "Other" without a brief explanation. I can show you log after log of what I give warnings for and 99% of it's for spam and marked as such. So either you did something wrong and I can't recall what it was, or the system is buggy. Either way a warning isn't the end of the world and if you behave - over time the warning can go away. Can you check the log to see what this warning was about? The text that I put above is all that I can see, so it looks like a bug in the system. Thanks, Tmariss
-
Last one from this batch.
-
Bonprix.de
Trying again to get an answer:
removed.
Still no mention of the "warnable offences" list. That starts to become interesting as sociopsychological phenomenon. Let's try again: Is it a taboo to mention the "warnable offences" list?
You still totally ignore the list of "warnable offences", the same way that carmelita did. Is it some taboo to mention the "warnable offsences" list? If it is a taboo to mention the "warnable offences", can somebody say that? Or even this a taboo too? my message: =================================== You didn't answer at all. The question was specific about the "warnable offences", and you didn't refer to it. Can I get an answer about this question: Why did I get a warning on an "offence" which does not appear _at all_ in the "warnable offences" list? To put it another way: Is it true that moderators also give warning for issues that are not mentioned in the "warnable offences"? Yes / No
You didn't answer at all. The question was specific about the "warnable offences", and you didn't refer to it. Can I get an answer about this question: Why did I get a warning on an "offence" which does not appear _at all_ in the "warnable offences" list? To put it another way: Is it true that moderators also give warning for issues that are not mentioned in the "warnable offences"? Yes / No
I'd be lying if I said I knew specifically what the warning was for - every mod and admin has their own standards. So what it doesn't say in the "warnable offences" list? Currently it says "The list above is more or less what we ask that people avoid." That doesn't fit so well with "every mod and admin has their own standards" What does that mean? Does it go away after a while? The list also talk about "percentage". What does that mean? Does a point correspond to percent?
That seems to have gone quiet, but I didn't get an answer. To recap: 1) I had in my liocation field a URL (non-comercial site http://models-in-boots.proboards.com/i) 2) Somebody edited it and left the message that is there noew, and somebody gave me a warning. I assumed it is the same person, but CarMELita wrote that he remove the URL but didn't give the warning http://www.bellazon....00#entry2963939 3) Assuming the warning was for the URL in the Location field, that is not fair because it clearly doesn't appear in any way in the list of warnable offences. So, either: 1) It should be added to the warnable offences. 2) You should make it clear that the moderators can give warning as they feel like. It would also be nice to know if the warning was really about the URL. trying again: Can I get a response from the moderators concerning the issue fo "warnable offences" list?
Things that don't appear in the "warnable offences" list. Aha, you mean this in a general way or can we narrow it down to something? Should we add something on the list that is missing? The list in "warnable offences" does not contain "putting a URL in your Location field". If it is a warnable offence, If that it needs to be added to this list.
Somebody gave me a warning because I had a URL (of a non-comercial site) in my "Location". That is not obvious from the rules, You need some gymnastics to deduce from the "No advertizing" rule. If this is really the intention, it needs to be made clearer. It is clearly not listed in the warnable offences, so I think it is unfair to give a warning for that.
Bonprix.
Last from metorstyle
madeleine.de
Few more
