worshipper pa

I don't know if she should be worshiped but she makes me worship her and she deserves it all and more.

NOTHING SPECIAL???? She is as special as they come!

owwwww today ?

HAPPY BIRTHDAY FOR INES ! all hapyness in the world for her !

worshipper_pa please dont suffered five hours of hell

Yes, November 21 is the most important day of the year.

I know it sounds bad but I have suffered so much for her! The worst thing is to life

without her, without even meeting her! All the self-torture I practise in order to

worship her is nothing compared to my mental suffering. Physical pain takes

mental pain away and in fact I feel strong happiness when I suffer self-inflicted pain.

Thank you purple!

I'm nothing compared to Goddess In

Sin City (N)

So Close (Y)

You are welcome miss_vellutini!

Claudia Schiffer ~15 years ago.

Funniest Argument in a Thread: Barry & Worshipper Pa

Funniest Hi-jacking of Another Person's Thread: Barry & Worshipper Pa

I am always the other part in funny arguments.

I think I must introduce an improved anti-fight program: (Heidegger & Barry anti-fight Program)

BEL CANTO

MULL HISTORICAL SOCIETY

Thanks Avenger!

fantastic pics!

Yes, it works but that does not mean it can predict things with 100% accuracy.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

If it's 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%, let's assume it's 100%.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

No, you can't do that!

You don't have to know how it works, but you can utilise it.

So, Michael Crichton told us.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Why do you believe Michael Crichton?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It has already worked.

Yes, it works but that does not mean it can predict things with 100% accuracy.

You don't have to know how it works, but you can utilise it.

So, Michael Crichton told us.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Why do you believe Michael Crichton?

It's possible to do with a very specific goal, using a supercomputer powered by quantum technology.

Quantum physics is about uncertainties!

Future of this thread: Unknown.

Isn't LaPlace's daemon basically saying, if you know EVERYTHING there is to know about a system at one point in time, then (theoretically) you can calculate and predict the behaviour of that system indefinitely?

Thread status: Hijacked!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yes, but the trick is to know everything with 100% accuracy. In practise that's impossible.

Hmmm... I was under the impression that a Laplace Demon can predict the future, as long as it's not too far away. Say within a century.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Laplace Demons have overestimated their capabilities.

Being able to predict something does not imply that you can predict it 100% of the time.

Just look at the weather. It is a chaotic system and we can normally only predict within 3 days accurately, but even then, there are cases where the Bureau of Meterology has predicted incorrectly, even with-in the 3 day time frame.

I hope I've answered whatever it is you're saying in that previous post. I'm not really sure what you're referring to.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

We have to separate two things, accurate and correct predictions. A prediction can be correct without being accurate. For example I can predict that you reply this post within the next 2 hours. If you do so, my prediction has been 100% correct but not that accute. When it comes to predicting wheather we can predict what kind of wheather it's going to be day after tomorrow but not what it is going to be exactly.

Wrong.

1) Predicting things with 100% accuracy is only possible in the short-run.

2) The more chaotic system the shorter time you can predict it's behaviour

1) + 2) => I believe that prediction can have a 100% accuracy, but only in the short-run.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Please don't humiliate yourself arguing these things with worshipper pa.

What is the time limit of short-run? One second? Four minutes? Two days? No matter how short the time is you can't predict the behaviour with 100% accuracy. Of course in slow deterministic systems you can do insanely accurate prediction in the short-run but that's not 100%, it's 99,99999999999% or something like that. The prediction errors are so small we can't measure them! The predictions seem 100% accure when they are not.

@Pa..iknow you and Heid think alike

Alike? I don't think so.

1) Predicting things with 100% accuracy is impossible.

2) The more chaotic system the shorter time you can predict it's behaviour

1) + 2) => No, I don't believe.

^ Hello Pa Nice to see you here

Hello Chris!

Hybrid - Wider Angle

till now i like only handel 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Handel is REALLY good! He's the third best composer ever after Elgar and J. S. Bach.

That's quite a surprise.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

In Finland the newspapers were full of that crap for one week! :x

Thanks again miss_vellutini!