zorzabosti
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by zorzabosti
-
-
More coupon spam in Model ID, General Discussion, and Male Actors: https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332690-kanak12/ https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332689-baat09/ https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332677-romaal987/ 🙄🙄🙄
-
-
🙄 Coupon spam in Actresses board https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332621-sanurajak/ Male Actors board https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332616-play98/ Movies board https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332616-play98/ Why even permit new users to create 10+ new topics in mere minutes?
-
-
-
-
-
... I really don't get the point of reposting a Reddit post here... Especially when the Reddit post is a 1080p scaled-down version with a machine translated caption as title. Instagram has been serving 1440p pictures for 7 years or so. You don't even need an IG account anymore. You can use the Network Tab of your browser, one of many add-ons, or even online tools. If you see a term like "p1080x1080" or "s1080x1080" in the original IG image URL, you're looking at a scaled-down version. Wow 1440p NAKARI & LUI Beachwear IG Video IG Story
-
@maddog107 How does Bellazon deal with small-filesize malicious GIF 💣s? You mentioned a ffmpeg step. AFAIK, ffmpeg is extremely permissive regarding input GIF #pixels (unlike ImageMagick): I almost crashed my system by doing a local ffmpeg conversion test with a single 💣 I assume there are sufficient (pre-ffmpeg) checks in place that will catch the problem on time, because overloading ffmpeg could present a potentially exploitable weakness (CWE-400).
-
-
Ad spam in the Male Actors Board. Spammer: https://www.bellazon.com/main/profile/332350-speed98/
-
@maddog107 I think I might've found a most silly (and surprisingly easy) exploit for clever members to get around the WEBP conversion of their image uploads. The original image is hosted on Bellazon and inside the post, with ipsLightbox zoom in and all. I've sent you a DM with the details 🥷
-
Yeah, the latest version of ffmpeg can do most of the WEBP stuff. It's the decoding WEBP animations (WEBP to other formats) that's not yet fully implemented (I think this ticket is still valid). I suppose one could use other tools to convert, then use ffmpeg. So ultimately it's no big problem. And it will only get better. I'll get around to updating... eventually.
-
-
I'm starting to think most of my issues are related to running old versions of tools and such. I remember stuff not working with WEBP years ago and simply never tried them again since. These come to mind: 1) The old exiftool (version before October 2022) did not fully support WEBP. 2) ffmpeg does not fully support WEBPs. Currently still struggles with decoding animated WEBPs, it seems. 3) I've used custom scripts to manipulate pictures directly, and they've always assumed JPEG or PNG. I'm sure there are alternatives. 4) Obviously my beloved jpegtran does not work on WEBPs... 5) Obviously my beloved OptiPNG and PNGCRUSH do not work on WEBPs... But don't worry about me. I can continue to use JPEGs and PNGs locally.
-
-
In my local test, WEBP are indeed consistently smaller. Zoomed in, I can reliably tell which of two pictures is the JPEG and which is the WEBP. Give me one random picture, and I can't tell which format it is from the observed quality alone. Maybe the stories I've heard are mostly old and/or exaggerated. Meta could have their own wild reasons for not using WEBP site-wide; I've seen both .webp and .heic files served to me as JPEG by Meta. Thanks. At risk of sounding completely insufferable, I'm using Linux... It's the local tools and scripts that don't fully support WEBP. I'm not trying to be difficult, it's just that I autistically love the idea of preserving quality. Awfully idealistic. TBF, BZ has always been re-compressing JPEGs since before I joined. Most members will simply not notice or care. Most importantly, realistically, and certainly not care enough to pay for the difference in bandwidth or storage.
-
Thanks for the reply. Yes, IG and FB support WEBP, but they are still serving JPEGs to me, not converting all media to WEBP is what I meant to say. In fact, video post thumbnails/(called "poster" in HTML) can be absolutely huge JPEGs. Most Every modern browsers supports WEBP, but local systems and pipelines may not. I suppose that problem is not really on Bellazon. It hurts user-friendliness/compatibility for some power users. I think I'll go test a few JPEGs and convert them to WEBP locally. Perhaps it's not as bad as my buddies are telling me. I do wonder why, say, Instagram is currently not actively converting all pictures then...
-
^ Bravissimo NAKARI & LUI Beachwear 8 more pics HD TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@/video/7621564649716092182 (18.2MB) Dore & Rose, Floral Edit Video Andeo Vrag
-
I've been thinking about this quite a bit. I'm not entirely convinced WEBP is truly the better format for normal web use. I know a few web admins / power users that are not happy with the perceived WEBP image quality for photos of people, especially closeups of faces, hands, and other skin. Compression can definitely be worse for smaller files. And there are some major compatibility concerns for old farts. I think it's telling that Meta (FB/IG), X, Pinterest, Shopify and so on are not broadly enforcing WEBP, though most do support it nowadays. Large JPEG can be compressed into smaller JPEGs (I don't think people can tell the difference between q=100 and q=90 or even q=80), and anything superfluous can reasonably be stripped anyway. In fact, sounds like unreasonably large picture files are the problem, not necessarily JPEGs themselves.
-
Test Test Test. ^PNG upload. EDIT1: The PNG upload is 0 bytes again. EDIT2: No "This post can no longer be edited" error after Saving edit 👍 EDIT3: Other PNGs appears to work just fine. Maybe the particular Newsletter pictures (1,2) are just funky. The dither of those original files makes me think of GIFs. Different PNG test EDIT4: So apparently WEBP does not support true 8-bit indexed color palettes like PNG-8. You can tell by the bitdepth of 8 and color type of 3. png:IHDR.color-type-orig: 3 png:IHDR.color_type: 3 (Indexed) png:PLTE.number_colors: 256
-
NAKARI & LUI Beachwear IG Video IG Story 105 pics 4K TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@/video/7621562821737811222 (89.7MB)
-
Honey Birdette, Lian Milk Boutique New work BTS Video ^^^ Many light neutrals, beige, and butter yellow this spring. (It pains me to see 6/7 posts on this page discussing or related to rule violations. I would love to help handle rule violations more quickly and keep this topic neatly organized. With limited moderation permissions I could actively help improve the situation. Feel free to DM me with opinions, support, or suggestions.)
-
NAKARI & LUI Beachwear Love Bravissimo HD TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@/video/7621990530737638658 (15.4MB)
