PeJovan

I'm surprised that everyone focused, on the blured parts of the photo. In terms of content, they are great. In my opinion, they lose heavily due to poor quality, resolution. Full of noise. And as for AI if the blur covers something unique then it should remain that way.

Thank you very much, I am impressed with the speed.

Hello everyone, anyone maybe know the name of this model. Photo from the official H&M store. https://www2.hm.com/pl_pl/productpage.0183728001.html Thank you in advance for your help. Greetings

Maybe not fake, I tried to de-censor this photo myself, I only took the hand. It's not difficult, but it's a bit of a chore. You can do practically anything in photoshop.

This is "Linda L - Waking Up" by Petter Hegre

Cool these magazine photos, just not sure why they add so much noise.

Simply, by replacing the data in the link. for example: low hq biger resolution I think, second example is only resize.

I don't think, it's a question of quality and lighting

Thank you, if she said so, I believe her. Thanks again for this information. best regards

it doesn't bother me, I just wondered if I had been ignorance for about three years. It actually looks great ❤

Is there an official confirmation somewhere that Josephine had enlarged breasts ??? I encounter poor quality information

https://www.instagram.com/p/CHDwLtMnoJY

https://www.instagram.com/p/CG5RfO2nK45