Tagold

Almost all those pictures posted years ago are just broken links now. Anybody care to repost classic Josie in hi-res?

You know guys, all those old scans you made and posted here, they're all lost now. None of those old links still works. The first 30 pages of this thread are just pages of broken links. So, if anybody out there has HQ scans of classic Kim, please post them again!

I couldn't agree more!

For what it's worth, I protest the gif of a woman chopping off a man's fingers. I'm going through this 300 plus page thread on Emily Ratajkowski and on every page, usually many times on each page, I have no choice but to see some woman take a knife and cut a man's fingers off---over and over and over again. Yes, I know, being male I should just buck up and deal with it. But if it was a man slicing off female fingers, the protest and cries of "misogyny" would be deafening.

Well, I'll never comment here again. No matter where they're posted, all comments I guess are sent all the way to the back, so what's the point?

I know that white hair looks awful!

It was a response to a "are Emily's boobs augmented" debate back on page 30, or something. The comment got sent to page 325 though. lol

It seems absolutely clear to me that fake breasts look fake, period. The occasional still photo may be ambiguous, but they will not remain ambiguous throughout a series of photos and video makes it obvious. Even a little augmentation results in scar tissue that alters the shape and takes out the jiggle. In the world of porn, fakes are instantly recognizable; they don't look, jiggle, move or "mush" like real breasts, not at all. Usually they're hard and wrinkled and have all the erotic appeal of helmets. But, even the best boob jobs are obvious. Show me video of fakes that look real. At the present state of the art, I don't think there exist fakes that could fool anyone who is even slightly discerning about it. I know Emily's boobs are real because they look real, and fakes never do.