Balisani

Oh, nice!!! I'd never seen that one, I don't think... thanks Qball

Caps and a paparazzo booty shot: Certain attachments removed because it contained nudity. Nudity must be textlinked with a warning. ~post edited by PinkCouture

No, she's had them (moderately) filled. The result is excellent, and would be perfect were it not for the (visible) scars around the areolas, a result of peri-areolar technique. A trans-axillary approach (cut along the crease of the armpits) or through the navel (as is being done in L.A. now) would have been virtually undetectable... were it not for earlier pictures of course.

Warning - partial nudity: One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten Eleven Twelve Thirteen Fourteen Fifteen Sixteen Seventeen Eighteen Nineteen Twenty Twenty-1 Twenty-2 Twenty-3 Twenty-4 Twenty-5

Thanks, sha!

Fabulous! You are a good man, sha!

I thought everyone should appreciate how beautiful she is, regardless of nudity (which doesn't offend me, but I can understand how it might offend folks from the Bible belt, or likewise minded). I'll put up the nude links soon - been busy, sorry!

No one's talking about her like God - who, unlike you, takes a capital G - mate Some may think (and perhaps justifiably so) she's a goddess, but that's another matter As to nobody being perfect, that goes without saying - or writing. But thanks for the reminder! Now, back to topic?

Bravo*GiPsY_grl* and thank you! Those are the best!

New Years Eve 2005 @ Opium:

Old, and I mean old, pictures:

"Reverse Anna" sounds more poetic, though, doesn't it?

Pink eye ?

Back to topic: Thanks, Surfer, for the clips! (Y)

Ah, but you're assuming: 1) There was cheating 2) She did the cheating Nothing is so certain I was speaking in general terms, but it appears if anyone does the cheating in a celebrity relationship, it's definitely the guy... Names like Keifer Sutherland (the strippers), Tom Cruise (Penelope...), Jude Law (the nanny and countless others...), Eric Benet (groupies...), Mario Lopez (the stripper at the stag party), and others (who were not publicized, so I won't do so here) come to mind (in case you're wondering, Brad Pitt is not one of those unpublicized - he gets enough publicity, and besides, he didn't get "caught"). Either that, or the girls are better than the guys are not getting caught (one very famous actress from across the pond notoriously cheated on her no less famous - but unsuspecting - actor B-F before he too got caught, and quite publicly, I might add). Either way, I don't want to associate Pampita with Hollywood sharks and hyenas, I'd meant to point out that even if there is no physical cheating, there are wandering eyes and heart (on both sides), and (relatively) long separations for shoots, etc, which can either definitely spice up an established relationship or sink a relatively immature union (immature by the parties involved, or by the duration of said union). And did I mention sh*t just f***ing happens?

Thumbs up indeed, thanks! (Y)

I guess this is what should be called a "Reververse Anna" (Kournikova) Thanks, Jig & Sha!

Who said a picture is worth a thousand words?

S**t happens, and s**t happens to you, me, everybody. There is no reason why celebrities should be spared from s**t. In fact, keeping relationships together when one (or worse, both) of the parties is famous requires an extraordinary amount of luck and will-power. Furthermore, when one marries young (like Pampita dearest), the likelyhood of "growing apart" is greater than when one marries at a time when one knows who the f**k one is, as you very well may know already. And when one is an interplanetary sex-kitten like Pampita (who's probably experienced more in her relatively short lifetime than most will in their entire life), the risks of "growing apart" (this includes infidelity) skyrocket. But that's just my opinion, and I, too, get sad when (insert your favorite famous couple here) split up due to "irreconcilable differences" for about 5mn...

You can say that again

Etc...

More unsorted:

Unsorted...