an Alien

About respect Korravai, I particularly want to thank you for your attention. You are right, there is a difference. Yes, it is; even if Eric the Tibetan did not choose this option on ZouZou. After all it is his personal choice. In front of the Saint Roch church, there was a giant screen that broadcast the ceremony for people who cannot enter in the church. The TV news of 20h broadcast equally the event: - TF1 "L'adieu du gotha à Yves Saint Laurent" - France 2 "Jeudi 5": the next to last subject "Les obsèques d'Yves Saint Laurent". It's a public event....if you saw some pics you like then post them. I agree also with Rob & Kiki. There is respect in the photos at Saint Roch church shot on June 5, 2008 and signed mainly by Eric Feferberg, among the pool of official photographers including also M. Bureau, G. Fuentes, B. Langlois, S. Pouzet. That is an important difference with paparazzi that never sign their "works" because they have forgotten what is respect.

Thanks to Monsieur Saint Laurent, my two preferred actresses together Credit: All about .............. Credit: Flights of Fancy by Persephone

The life must continue

Thanks Lisa A year ago: Yves Saint Laurent Haute Couture 2000

Thanks Korravai Bravo Yves [Well done Yves]

Shape of heart

Paparazzi, give me a break I believed that OrengeO was a teenager, that does not seem to be the case. My fake argument about the copyrights was enough sensitive to reveal the true character behind OrengeO. Chapter 4 clearly indicates what kind of `serious pictures,' OrengeO dreams to share with us. OrengeO actually could have the soul of a ... paparazzi.

OrengeO, STOP posting stolen photos. I do not treat anybody like a victim. You surely would not like to see your private life published on the Internet like you do for her. I will argue each assumption if you wish details. That is the problem. A paparazzi by definition does not have any limit. He continuously shoots his target without scruples. The chief editor of the publication has a limit to avoid a trial hence the fuzzy effect artificially added on the photos. He chooses what could be published or not. He is legally responsible and he is not anonymous. You do not filter anything. It is too easy to protect you behind an anonymous nickname. I agree with you. Do NOT duplicate the stolen photos. Put a hyperlink to the original web site if you want with a warning like for the nude photos. This could give you the idea to "acknowledge" or condemn the original author. The problem is not about Laetitia but about you, who reproduce stolen photos, who ignore what are the rights of authors, the idea itself of private life. The photos of paparazzi give information about where one could meet her or allow recognizing her close relations. I already acknowledged you but it seems that you have recently forgotten why you have deleted the pictures. Fortunately I am not a moderator of this forum otherwise I will delete all stolen photos without any explanations. You are free to post what you want. I am free to explain my point of view even if I know that it is not yet very popular. However I hope that the things could evolve for people who `do not see where is the problem.' How do you explain that most of people in this forum never post stolen photos? Did they understand something that I do not need to repeat again and again? I do not insult you as a person while you are hidden behind a nickname. I condemn without reserve your behavior. I reply with the same aggressiveness of the stolen photos that you publish without asking for permission while you will intrude on her private life.

Fortunately Laetitia did not tidy up her hair in an adorable chignon that I adore. Thanks for the dream visions and see you soon.

Kiki, how did you guess what she wears behind her golden coat? It is your casual habitude? Oi!!!! Join the queue matey!!!! :rofl: The queue!!! AAAHHHHHHHH!! Now we are talking the same language!!! What do you want to queue up? What about a :rofl: parallel process :rofl: in real time! Rob, I was so jalous that Korravai dedicated the following sensual angle of view only for you.

The hypothesis Thanks Lisa! You're right to highlight the keypoint about the children. I agree with you: Angèle and Giuseppe are romantic but I do not need a photo of their private life. With Kiki, you have noticed a certain change in Laetitia's clothes. Did you anticipate the DeNUNciation? Consider the hypothesis where the Laetitia's choice is to render ugly the paparazzi's photos, ... ... because paparazzi believe that the Grey and the Black are not enough glamour.Before Laetitia did not wear black sunglasses. Before she did wear more colored clothes. Now the Black color protects her. ___________ By the way Kiki, Oh yes I want to have a serious talk with you if you keep almost only your red high heels (matching red garters and black stockings are acceptable with miniskirt). I will bring the whip.

In the garbage cans of the Internet Thanks! Lovely! With the numerous genuine supports given to OrengeO, the receivers [les receleurs] of stolen photos will be spurred to excavate more deeply in the garbage cans of the Internet. Each time you reproduce these photos, they become more sordid because of the incentive of the paparazzi and the scathe [atteinte morale] they could cause. Would you like that unknown photographs take you in photo each time you kiss your lover in the street or you choose your lingerie? The worst is that you put these stolen photos at the same level than photos by the best photographers simply because there is Laetitia on the picture. There is nothing romantic about poisoning the Laetitia's life stealing photos of her private life. While you indirectly support this market by your encouragement, you are accomplice.

Oh a pregnant woman: incredible! The face of a child and of another woman not digitally blurred: what accomplishment! :yuckky: rumorhasit, your celebration of the mother's day is pitiful.

Congratulation Stella to be the first to find the theme of the Florian Zeller's play and the dates!

It is historic! It is the first time that new extracts of movie are published in second week. Into the bargain, I believe it is the first time that a Laetitia's movie won 10% of copies in second week. :hell yea!: Yes, you can participate to the adventure publishing your 4 stars review :dance: to increase the current number of 52 reviewers. The objective "more than 50 reviews" is already reached!

Three unpublished extracts of Nés en 68 by Canal+ Catherine & Hervé Yves, Caroline & Catherine Ludmilla & Boris

I asked the Tibetan dude for his own review, which is still in review by AlloCiné moderators. Catherine in Nés en 68, Quartier Latin of Paris, May 1968. The review of Eric the Tibetan has been now published and translated. It's up to you to write your review!

CarMELita, the movie is distributed by Pyramid International and could interest Germany, since the leader of May 68 Daniel Cohn-Bendit has been expelled from France by the French government. So he chose Germany and supported the party of the Greens [Die Grünen]. Anyway in October 2008 the movie will be broadcast by ARTE, which is a French and German TV! Nevertheless I strongly recommend watching the movie in theaters.

A call for French reviewer Floflandrin, I am happy that you appreciate her movie! To post your review only in French, just click the link "Ecrivez votre critique !" in the right frame. I asked the Tibetan dude for his own review, which is still in review by AlloCiné moderators.

In this May 21st, Catherine (Laetitia Casta) is in front of the new generation represented by her son Boris (Théo Frilet) on a red revolutionary background in the front-page of mk2! After a final countdown from the last half-hour, every 10 minutes, the game to win movie tickets is now over. But you still could watch the mk2 interview of the filmmakers.

TV news of Soir3 on May 18 Great news, Lisa & Letycja!