an Alien

Kiki wrote it before the Rob dude.

You're right. You must remove your own sacrilegious picture. In reality, the most terrible weapon against was the paparazzi picture even fuzzy. This legally disqualified Rob the Dude who has been sacrificed instead of under the Laetitia's eyes. So the G girl is the new identity of Rob the Dude.

However their king was the himself! Jean-Paul Goude, Galeries Lafayette 2003 What coronation!

Keep your cool, Rob. Don't believe Kiki when she said she uses an aphrodisiac.

Three previous pages without any waffle! You are suffering from waffle addict. Rob, in French "Boucle la (your seat belt / your mouth)" means also Shut-up. Hold the line Kiki! Let us stay in touch! Hence the HOT line

Do you feel the cold of ... the phone?

It is a signed drawing. The artist is free to interpret the pinup style.

He does not give a toss [Il n'en a rien à "secouer"] except something for the pollution of the pictures. :yuckky: Great, just today he quickly purged his BZ profile <_< except his e-mail. How many time will he take to fix his profile from SuperiorPics? His reputation of exhibitionist is clear. He wanders in BZ, SuperiorPics, France Vidcaps, etc... to make porn with YOUR pictures he found for his porn site: read the admin message he promptly removed today because of my warning: Remember that his first picture posted in these columns was a fake he removed except the thumbnail! The following could give you an idea what is he fishing in this board: CONFIRMED TARGET in his porn site on Saturday, August 16, 2008 1:15 am

Does he plan to pollute the wallpaper with his personal "white small cream cheese" [petit suisse] justifying the banishment of his signature by the administrator of Bellazon?

I cannot believe that he did it. He <_< posted a close-up portrait of her face. Everybody can read the indubitable reason in red --below each of his posts-- explaining why the admin banished his signature. What kind of ink could he use to sign his "artistic works"?

In your acknowledge, don't repeat the entire set of pictures, but only your preferred "close-up portrait" of her "face." Cease and Desist suggestion It could be interesting to know if you will photoshop the picture or if you will print it to shoot it again after the addition of your "personal tribute." Does the alteration of the original picture constitute a copyright infringement since you continue to publish online your "works" according to the result of your "polls" about your next "targets?" Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Frederica Opening preventively an umbrella against horizontal rain (of bullets), I would say that she looks the Ondine's age.

From Frederica to Francesca

Caroline Trentini vs. Claudia Schiffer best smile: Caroline best lips: Caroline best walk: Caroline Laetitia Casta vs. Rianne Ten Haken best back: Laetitia best cleavage: Laetitia best face: Laetitia

I do not know why Rob overreacts. He was so peaceful before Kiki unfairly introduced the concept of lethal high-heel shoes against the . Maybe she could come back to do something for him. :evil: It is what I try to do. Great idea CarMELita although I would suggest that the brands should pay the author of the message, not the support. Jean-Paul Goude, Rentrée très classe [start of the new very class school year], Galeries Lafayette 2001 All of sudden the "large audience" is become "a small group of Nerds." CarMELita, you wrote this at the 10,610th post. It is too fun.

Vive les différences ! [Long life the differences between the forums!] In the Laetitia's artistic universe, the Tibetan dude is interested in what she says, what she sees, what she appreciates. On the ZouZou forum, this bloke from the North Pole whishes to learn more about people she meets. A scoop for this Tibetan guy is not necessary a pictorial about Laetitia but when the troubadours of the movie Nés en 68 replied to his e-mail giving the reasons (not shown in the movie) when they left the community after the concert in Latar. Marino Parisotto Vay, Swarovski 2003 After all Laetitia does not look at herself 24 hours a day in her mirror.

Gilles Bensimon, The Bare Necessities, ELLE USA April 1998 that I quoted in Korr's Chanel thread indicating who is the unknown photographer. Yes, they did because of copyright infringement. Now their archive contains most only ELLE editorials. The worst is when all of a sudden a Laetitia's web site disappears without giving any reason. Direct linking, deep linking or simply duplicating a new cover (or even pictorials, not to say the entire editorial) before or during the sales of the magazine and even after constitutes of course a copyright infringement. One could discuss about the case of the Fair Use of the cover considered as advertising for the magazine. In the war between Fair Use and Cease-and-Desist letters, the Tibetan dude chose to indicate directions to find a new cover, pictorial or partial editorial in order that at least the official web site of the magazine will receive a visit. You are free to click or not to the ads of their sponsors. The case of ELLE magazine The French ELLE magazine developed an interesting strategy. An extract of the main article if published online with some pictures (in small format) during the week of the sales of the magazine. At the end of the week, the entire article is often published. That is why the Tibetan dude prefers to put on ZouZou a hyperlink to the partial article then later to the other pages of the full article on the official site because their webmaster counts the number of visitors by web page during the week of the publishing then after. When you scan the full editorial and publish it in these columns before anybody, of course you will receive a lot of thank you but these acknowledges will not increase the popularity of the article on the official site of the magazine. The chief editor of the magazine could consult the number of sales, the statistic of activity of the official web site but not the number of thank you on BZ.

Markus Klinko & Indrani, Diamond.com 2000 Rob, why from your point of view did BWGreyScale remove all editorials from Vogue, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Harper's Bazaar, Marie-Claire, Cosmopolitan and Esquire on request of their respective counsels despite the fact that BWGreyScale "stayed three months behind the current issue in the newsstand, as to not interfere with the sales of the magazine"?

On the road to St. Michael's Mount Sylvie Lancrenon, Mont Saint Michel 2003

Before I removed the Editor's note about the ZouZou forum, you were quicker to reply your joke. I simplified the Editor's note from the following consideration explaining why you never click to the hyperlinks: "That is why Rob was wandering when --in the past-- he clicked to the hyperlinks to the ZouZou forum."