Ph.: Mark Prinz • Source: his 500px • Res.: 2048px

Ph.: Sacha Leyendecker • Source: his 500px • Date: Apr 11, 2017 Res.: 1500px

Nudity

Spoiler

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Ph.: Mark Prinz • Source: his 500px • Res.: 2048px

 

 

Spoiler

Image hidden for guestsSign in to viewImage hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Thanks @h_dden I saw those last night but didn't have time to post them

Ph.: Alexey Grechushnikov • Vinogradov MK, Prosvet Studio • Source: his VK • Date: posted June 1 2018 • Res.: 1920px

Ph.: Christoph Gellert • Source: his IG & FB • Date: posted Nov. 2017, pro'ly taken Oct. 2017 during Leyendecker MK • Res.: 2048px, 1350px

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

This one was on her IG, posted May 22 2018, it's *probably* from Sophie Neemaign's shoot (same backdrop), and the 2nd one was posted yesterday
Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

 

Ph.: Nasko Flan (aka Atanas Tumbov) • Source: his IG & FB • Date: taken Apr 14-16 2018 during Vinogradov/Guselnikov MK • Res.: 2048px

Sadly one is censored

Image hidden for guestsSign in to viewImage hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

 

Ph.: Robin Bjoern • Source: his IG • Date: taken Apr 25 2018 OR BEFORE, Cologne, Germany • Res.: 1350px

Shooting vid: (duration 58 secs, source: IG, 3.87 MB)

Spoiler

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

Ph.: Yury Lyamin (aka Yuriy) • Source: his 500px, VK, IG • Date: posted May 19 2018 • Res.: 2048px & var

Image hidden for guestsSign in to viewImage hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

19 hours ago, neurovibe said:

Ph.: Mark Prinz • Vinogradov MK, Prosvet Studio • Source: his 500px • Date: posted June 1 2018 • Res.: 1920px

@neurovibeThis is on Alexey Grechushnikov VK am I missing something

Dup from above not as censored but still is

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

3 hours ago, wndmkr said:

@neurovibeThis is on Alexey Grechushnikov VK am I missing something

Oh, I had copy-pasted the formatting but forgot to edit the name, fixed now, thanks!

Ph.: Stanislav Mironov • Source: his VK • Date: posted Nov. 1 2015 • Res.: 1000px

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

The following seems to have been omitted in previous posts (the black & white ones)

Ph.: Alexander Prischepov (Pryschepov) • Source: his VK • Date: shot Feb. 7 2016 • Res.: 1024px

Nudity:

Spoiler

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

 

Ph.: Mark Prinz • Date: shot May 24 2018 • Source: his 500px • Res.: 2048px

(testing Charlie's Alter Ego's comment: filesize before upload: 537 KB)
Nudity:

Spoiler

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Ph.: Robin Bjoern • Source: his IG • Date: taken Apr 25 2018 OR BEFORE, Cologne, Germany • Res.: 1350px

49 minutes ago, neurovibe said:

(testing Charlie's Alter Ego's comment: filesize before upload: 537 KB)

 

Spoiler

 

Here is a zipped up example for the BZ/ImageMagick compression before my complaint...

compression example bofere complaint.zip containing original file + BZ/IM compressed file (60-75% compression) for comparison.

 

...and here is a zipped up example for the compression after my complaint.

compression example after complaint.zip containing original file + BZ/IM compressed file (5-10% compression) for comparison.

 

The 'compression-rate'-settings must have been set to a much lower 'compression-rate' since my complaint about it. 

 

11 minutes ago, Charlie's Alter Ego said:

 

  Hide contents

 

Here is a zipped up example for the BZ/ImageMagick compression before my complaint...

compression example bofere complaint.zip containing original file + BZ/IM compressed file (60-75% compression)

 

...and here is a zipped up example for the compression after my complaint.

compression example after complaint.zip containing original file + BZ/IM compressed file (5-10% compression)

 

The compression-rate-settings must have been changed to a much lower compression-rate since my complaint. 

 

I got 536K when I saved the test, I have found that I have to enlarge the pics to their max size ( if enlargeable ) before saving to get the max image or I get a smaller file size and res.

HAY 100 PAGES!!!

3 minutes ago, wndmkr said:

I got 536K when I saved the test, I have found that I have to enlarge the pics to their max size ( if enlargeable ) before saving to get the max image or I get a smaller file size and res.

 

enlarged or not, the image always has the same (compressed size) for me

 

1 minute ago, wndmkr said:

HAY 100 PAGES!!!

 

WooHoo 

Congratz Guys and thx for 100 Pages ! 

12 hours ago, Charlie's Alter Ego said:

 

  Hide contents

 

Here is a zipped up example for the BZ/ImageMagick compression before my complaint...

compression example bofere complaint.zip containing original file + BZ/IM compressed file (60-75% compression) for comparison.

 

...and here is a zipped up example for the compression after my complaint.

compression example after complaint.zip containing original file + BZ/IM compressed file (5-10% compression) for comparison.

 

The 'compression-rate'-settings must have been set to a much lower 'compression-rate' since my complaint about it. 

 

 

Hm. Well I'm starting to think they might have a "cron" job (automatic scheduled tasks on the server) to have a second pass at compression because now, later, that same pic (the nude by Mark Prinz in the spoiler) is 370 KB (yes, even when zoomed max in a new tab), which is 69% compressed when compared to its 537 KB original.

Just as a side note in case anyone quotes me on this: 69% is NOT the set compression ratio, it could be something more as described by @Charlie's Alter Ego (ex.: 60-75), and this one just happened to fall on 69 because of the nature of compression (near pixels that share common shades, noise, etc, that factor in). Oh, and EXIF data is now also stripped, as probably all headers.

 

It is a bummer though, as I no longer see the point, at least for what I post here, in finding "the best version" I have, since it'll be compressed once more, by a lot, here. I've compared that said photo in photoshop with its original, the one I uploaded, used the DIFFERENCE mode in layer as too see how much the pixels have been compressed, and it's quite a lot as shown below. I've also boosted the levels so it's more apparent but this only lightens the same pixels, the deterioration stays intact, and cropped:

 

(click to enlarge)
Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

12 hours ago, wndmkr said:

HAY 100 PAGES!!!

 

Yay! We made it !!!

Oh, I forgot I was coming here to post something,

Ph.: Mark Prinz • Date: shot May 21 2018 • Source: his 500px • Size on upload: 535 KB  • Res.: 2048px

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

What it might look like in a day or two after upload:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

Ph.: Andrea Gozzo (aka AndyGo) • MK: Vinogradov/Guselnikov • Date: shot April 14 2018 • Source: his 500px • Res.: 2048px