November 9, 20231 yr 16 hours ago, pimpl said: I think she is a perfect woman. Just increadibly beautiful. Doing the Lords work, thank you! Can you please share how you managed to get those pics in such a good quality? The resolution of stock photos on Change.com are always so poor as I’m sure you already know.
November 9, 20231 yr Sure thing.. If you look at the image source, there is a suffix "&w=1920&q=75". You simply repace that suffix by "&w=3840&q=100" e.g.: https://www.change.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com%2F23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg&w=1920&q=75 vs. https://www.change.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com%2F23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg&w=3840&q=100 Depending on the site there are different methods.. But I often look for indicators like '&' or '%' and change the values.. A bit trial and error. Sometimes you can look at the sources folders of the site in developer tool of chrome browser.. then there are different tricks. But I am no web developer, so most likely there are WAY better methods.
November 9, 20231 yr 42 minutes ago, pimpl said: Sure thing.. If you look at the image source, there is a suffix "&w=1920&q=75". You simply repace that suffix by "&w=3840&q=100" e.g.: https://www.change.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com%2F23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg&w=1920&q=75 vs. https://www.change.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com%2F23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg&w=3840&q=100 Depending on the site there are different methods.. But I often look for indicators like '&' or '%' and change the values.. A bit trial and error. Sometimes you can look at the sources folders of the site in developer tool of chrome browser.. then there are different tricks. But I am no web developer, so most likely there are WAY better methods. Yes but the original image is 3000 x 4000 🙂. You have to erase all before "url?=" and replace "%3A%2F%2F" by "://" and each "%2F" by "/" and you got the original one. https://d9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg
November 9, 20231 yr @pimplThank You again for posts.🙂 I have a question. Have You get everything of Ida from Change website? I see that there is a few unposted here.
November 9, 20231 yr ... the more you know... Nice! Thank you! But i really see no difference in that case. Resolution is the same despite the original seems to have higher dpi. Anyways, kudos.
November 9, 20231 yr @pawko15: No.. I just glimpsed through the Lingerie stuff.. i know for sure that there is a lot of swimwear with Ida.. Hope someone will add those..
November 9, 20231 yr @Morph69 May I ask if you know how to get the original source images from lovalies.com? e.g.: https://www.loavies.com/en/15685203606-one-shoulder-bikini-top-mint-lurex/ Only way I found to improve the image quality is to remove the highlighted part from the link. The quality i noticebly better, but only in some rare cases I end up with UHQ resolution. e.g.: https://loavies-assets.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=webp,sharpen=0.3,width=1000,dpr=1,quality=75/media/catalog/product/1/5/15685203600-1_1.jpg vs. https://loavies-assets.com/cdn-cgi/image/dpr=1/media/catalog/product/1/5/15685203600-1_1.jpg Any idea what the 'dpr=1' fragment does? Changing the 'device pixel ratio' value makes no apparent difference.. Again, thank you for the information.
November 9, 20231 yr 18 hours ago, pimpl said: @Morph69 May I ask if you know how to get the original source images from lovalies.com? e.g.: https://www.loavies.com/en/15685203606-one-shoulder-bikini-top-mint-lurex/ Only way I found to improve the image quality is to remove the highlighted part from the link. The quality i noticebly better, but only in some rare cases I end up with UHQ resolution. e.g.: https://loavies-assets.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=webp,sharpen=0.3,width=1000,dpr=1,quality=75/media/catalog/product/1/5/15685203600-1_1.jpg vs. https://loavies-assets.com/cdn-cgi/image/dpr=1/media/catalog/product/1/5/15685203600-1_1.jpg Any idea what the 'dpr=1' fragment does? Changing the 'device pixel ratio' value makes no apparent difference.. Again, thank you for the information. Every site is different, for Loavies i do almost the same thing as you but i keep "format" https://loavies-assets.com/cdn-cgi/image/format/media/catalog/product/1/5/15685203600-1_1.jpg
November 10, 20231 yr 7 hours ago, pimpl said: Sure thing.. If you look at the image source, there is a suffix "&w=1920&q=75". You simply repace that suffix by "&w=3840&q=100" e.g.: https://www.change.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com%2F23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg&w=1920&q=75 vs. https://www.change.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd9b939151ee07bf0e591-ebba1101945ef96d80f0a81d6fa8a3cb.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com%2F23113322205_look-A-JCbABkqu.jpg&w=3840&q=100 Depending on the site there are different methods.. But I often look for indicators like '&' or '%' and change the values.. A bit trial and error. Sometimes you can look at the sources folders of the site in developer tool of chrome browser.. then there are different tricks. But I am no web developer, so most likely there are WAY better methods. Thanks for sharing. You missed this one: https://www.change.com/dk/product/felicia-hofteholder-black-22126413111 A couple of other ones have already been taken down from the website, unfortunately.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.