October 8, 20195 yr Alright, someone not saying names reported a post here because the person said " This page has AIDS" and people found it offensive? the fuck... He wasn't saying Kristina had AIDS... He's saying with the amount of GIFS and more GIFS's and then more, that the THREAD WAS AIDS because of how bogged down and slowly pages were loading. Personally I would of said the thread was Ebola, has a little more punch. Once more there is a BIG different between saying "This page has aids" <--- Not bad "Kristina has aids" < -- Bad
October 9, 20195 yr 20 hours ago, Prettyphile said: Alright, someone not saying names reported a post here because the person said " This page has AIDS" and people found it offensive? the fuck... He wasn't saying Kristina had AIDS... He's saying with the amount of GIFS and more GIFS's and then more, that the THREAD WAS AIDS because of how bogged down and slowly pages were loading. Personally I would of said the thread was Ebola, has a little more punch. Once more there is a BIG different between saying "This page has aids" <--- Not bad "Kristina has aids" < -- Bad I reported the post. I'd do it again. I don't know if the original poster meant it the way you describe, or if s/he meant something else, but either way, I found the offensive in that it trivialized a serious and, for many people, painful issue. If s/he thought GIFs on the thread were excessive, s/he should say that. If s/he thinks we're all stupid for looking at pictures of beautiful models, go ahead and say that. "This page has AIDS" is a childish, useless comment, and in my opinion, worthy of censure.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.