neurovibe

Ph.: Anastasiya Veter • for: Fangahra Corsets • Date: shot Jan 26 2019 • Source: their IG • Res.: 1349px

Great! Ph.: Maksim Serikow • Date: posted July 2019 • Source: his IG • Res.: var (medium-small) We need higher res' of these 2 first ones, they're insane Ph.: Maksim Serikow • for: Yes No Maybe Store (finally have the photog name too) • Date: posted July 2019 • Source: his IG • Res.: 1350px

Adds to this set Ph.: Roman Romanovich (aka Onsen) • Date: posted early as Jul 11 2019 • Source: his IG, his IG 2 • Res.: ~1350px

Wow Ph.: Joerg Clephas • Date: shot Oct 21 2018 • Source: his 500px [ id*: 1000438993 ] • Res.: 2000px (uploaded size: 3861px) *including ID while someone figures out 500px's new method UPDATE: 2nd one considered "nude" so lower res' : 1000px, id: 311721147

Yah, it was (I know this is just a forget from your part, just don'T forget the nude spoiler). Date: shot Apr. 15 2018. 1500px Nudity:

@wndmkr Cool, thanks!

Good idea, for the TV via HDMI. I don't know if bandwidth is the correct term I used since yes, I know bandwidth (in all other senses and in home connections) is the amount per X time, such as volts vs amperage. I forget the word or maybe I used that word, every time I've coded websites or backends on servers, the hosting said bandwidth (or another word that I forget) as amount of data that can be served over a monthly invoice, thus my (maybe) confusion. I somehow always attributed traffic as unique users, maybe I was wrong. My reasoning, which I never apparently questioned post-2000's, was that the more unique visitors, the more bandwidth used. Well well Meanwhile on IG: Ph.: n/a • Date: posted early July 2019 • Source: their IG • Res.: 1350px

Hm, interesting, I'll try that out. Unfortunately I'll have to spoof the res', only my tv is 4k. p.s.: I think you meant reduce bandwidth, but yah, sounds logical

BTW, it's a shame I can't work on this right now, but if ever anyone of you guys or a guest reading this knows how to code, the json format file called which contains the URL (including for nudes, I tested) is sent through the http requests, so that's a good place to start

Hm. And you're signed in? That sucks.

Thanks! And awesome! I get 2000px res'. Ideally we'd get that extra 48px though. Check this one out: This image (known 2048px): https://500px.com/photo/284061713/anastasiya-by-chris-bos Link: Changing m= (m3%d) 2048 won't work though, neither the quality (q) setting UPDATE: No longer need to do that "right click" and selection source, just do view source. Ctrl+F this: og:image The 1st one (at least for now) is a meta tag containing that same URL. So meanwhile we have that I guess

Can you tell me when either one gets to work again? Sucks for your account though

@wndmkr Thanks for all the updates! Meanwhile, 500px did a "scheduled maintenance" lasting 10 hours yesterday and I tested my 500px downloader that I had coded myself years ago but got errors. Then went to the site, picking a random image, checking the source: it's completely revamped. I don't have much time to invest in this right now, hence my not being here on Bellazon lately neither, so I'll wait if someone else codes an update. I think I heard some of you guys use other resources/sites/extensions, so I'll eait it out a few days or a week, and if ever any of you successfully are able to download via these other resources, could you please let me know so I don't waste my time coding an update? From what I saw (only spent 10 minutes on it though so I may be wrong), there's sort of a two-step loading scheme. 1st: json query, which then calls (with a string within the array) the URL to the image, so you can't just "look at the source code" straight forward anymore. A temporary fix is (in Firefox) selecting the image (as if you were trying to highlight it), press the context menu key (equivalent of right-click, often at the right of the space bar on PC), then choosing "View selection source". This allows to view the output (after the json query) and there you have a URL you can drag into a new tab.

@wndmkr Those are by Sasha Tereshchenko, and thanks! Ph.: Joerg Clephas • Germany • Date: shot Oct. 21 2018 • Source: his 500px • Res.: 2048px

Ph.: Mikhail Kabochkin • Date: shot Jul. 4 2019 • Source: his IG • Res.: 1080px BTS:

Thanks nontheless @wndmkr nice adds Ph.: Alexander Elizarov • Date: posted early as Mar. 22 2019 • Source: His VK • Res.: 1350px (meh, just an IG repost)

Nice find! Ph.: Andrea Gozzo • Date: shot Apr. 14 2018 • Source: his 500px • Res.: 2048px

Ph.: Grégory Fountoussov • for: Couture de Nuit • Date: shot Mar. 14 2019 • Source: their IG • Res.: 1080px Man I love her face in the 1st one

Only posted those from this set that haven't been posted on pages 1 & 3 Ph.: Tania T Van Zyl • Date: shot end of May, 2018 • Source: her IG (& Nicola's site) • Res.: 1350px -> 1600px

Ph.: Rudiger Linden (Germany) • Date: posted early as Sept. 2018 • Source: his 500px • Res.: 1000px

Ph.: Alexandr Multikov (aka Orshansky) • Date: shot Aug. 22 2018 • Source: his IG • Res.: 1350px

Ph.: Grégory Fountoussov • for: Couture de Nuit • Date: shot Mar. 14 2019 • Source: their IG • Res.: 1080px Implied nudity

In color: (Volotova's IG, 1350px)

Ph.: Frederic Wojcik • Date: posted early as May 28 2019 • Source: his IG • Res.: 1080px

Ph.: Zhenya Potach • for: A'Kate (brand) • Date: 1st posted May 24 2019 • Source: their VK Group • Res.: 2160px (most of them) Other links: their website , their IG