Bast

What do you mean? What did you not like that they were doing before? Just curious.

Ok, thanks for letting me know.

I got the t-shirts mainly b/c I like the designs & etc. I am also cool with Candice so it all worked out As for the second part of your post, I posted it in the Site & Forum section b/c that's the best place to asks your questions Ok, thanks I appreciate it.

...Is anybody else having trouble lately clicking on pictures to make them bigger? Sometimes it works, but over half the time it hasn't been working for me, these past few days. For example when I try to enlarge these photos of those shirts, it just opens a blank Internet page, and it has been doing this on many different models pages. I only use my iPhone to get online, unless I am at work, so I do t know if it is my phone or what, but does anybody have any advise about this? Or has this been happening to anyone else? I have the same issue when trying to view those images on my iPod. The pages to the images are blank b/c they would not load. However on my laptop it is fine. That's really weird, it has worked fine for months, and just now started happening, for me anyway. How long has it been doing that for you on your iPad?

I have to agree with this. There is a difference between being a fan and being a zealot/worshipper. I like her, as she is an incredibly beautiful woman and has a great personality to boot. However, I don't eat, sleep, and drink Candice like some do. I think a t-shirt borders on fanaticism. You guys must think I am mad creepy & weird then b/c I own both of these TV shirts ... And I am not even a Superfan!!! I don't think so. The way I see it, is your supporting Candice, and helping to promote her, which in my opinion is a good thing, because I want her to be more known and popular with the general public, not just people like us. So I don't think it's creepy at all, people wear shirts with celebrities on them all the time, why not an amazing model?On another note. Is anybody else having trouble lately clicking on pictures to make them bigger? Sometimes it works, but over half the time it hasn't been working for me, these past few days. For example when I try to enlarge these photos of those shirts, it just opens a blank Internet page, and it has been doing this on many different models pages. I only use my iPhone to get online, unless I am at work, so I do t know if it is my phone or what, but does anybody have any advise about this? Or has this been happening to anyone else?

I believe you are right

Yes, you did! Good work. How is that a "porno pic"? A nude modeling photo is not a "porno pic". Your kind of giving me the impression of a 12 year old boy seeing his first pair of breasts. With that said, do you have a source and date for this photo? lol. I think he is joking. I hope so.

How is that a "porno pic"? A nude modeling photo is not a "porno pic". Your kind of giving me the impression of a 12 year old boy seeing his first pair of breasts. With that said, do you have a source and date for this photo?

I thought it looked pretty sexy my self. She CAN'T look horrible!I luv her hair it makes her look like a sexy wild lionThat was my thought as well, hence why I said it looked pretty sexy.

Yeeep they shrunk her chin still looks gorgeous but she's an impossible beauty and these stupid magazines remove some here and add some there . I think her breasts were PS in the pic where she's in yellow and a lot of the others. Come onnnnnn Sara has one of the most perfect faces and boobs in the industry why do they have to change it :-( boo to PS abuse! Sara is perfectShe even looks better with no ps! ❤

vlcsnap-2013-07-05-08h10m59s203.jpgIs it possible that this video/screencap came from that stupid-ass Russell James "Around The House" book that no longer exists? This is where I reckon that video is taken from. Cuz where else u gonna find softcore images like this than from that goddamned book that wasn't published yet? What's wrong with Russell James? I mentioned this at the end of my post, 2 posts back, but at the end of those videos they all said www.CandiceSwanepoel.com, so maybe those video were made for that website? I tend to think though, that if they were made for anything dealing with Russell James, then his name would have been somewhere in the "credits", at the end of the video, or even mentioned at the beginning.And are you saying "softcore", as in softcore porn? If so, I would not call them softcore at all. Many models have done videos like that, they are nothing abnormal in my opinion, and the ones I am thinking of we're not done by Russell James. So I don't see how a video like that "could only be done by Russell James". You seem to have some animosity towards Russell James and his work, and I am curious why? I thought those videos were great, and Candice was wonderful in them, whether or not Russell James was involved. Again though, I would not call them softcore, if you mean it the way I am thinking, and if so, I am curious to know what you would call some of Candice's other work that actually contains nudity? The reason being, those videos didn't even show any actual nudity, and we know Candice isn't opposed to doing nude work, so if they wanted nudity to be in them, I am sure they would have put it in there. Even if they did though, it would still be a far cry from softcore, and I would have still thought they were great videos, maybe even better, because there is nothing wrong with nudity in my opinion, especially when done well/tastefully. I thought the videos were fun, artistic, and very sexy, and definitely within the realm of modeling.

I don't think she ever tries too hard to be sexy, let alone "often". She is the definition of sexy in my opinion. Of course her body, eyes, face etc, are all sexy, but just the way she moves, and the expressions she makes, in my opinion that is a big factor in her "sexiness". I can't really explain it, but I don't ever get the impression that her being sexy is forced, it always seems so natural to me, and that is part of the reason it is so sexy. Same goes for her being relaxed, in my opinion, she almost always seems completely relaxed in any setting. I really can't think of one example of what your talking about. Well, I'm not alone with my opinion. There are a lot of people who noticed this, not only here on Bellazon, but also on other sites, too. But of course just because many people share the same opinion, it doesn't make it true. So agree to disagree. Fair enough.

I thought it looked pretty sexy my self.

I absolutely can not get over how much I love that shoot!!! She looks so unbelievably hot and sexy.

I agree, I think they both look so good, but especially together in that photo.

Okay, the music by Dead can dance gives me the creeps, but Candice is hot as hell of course. The first one is my favorite. You know, Candice often tries too hard to look sexy, but in the Unplugged video, she actually manages to come off natural and relaxed. That's the spirit, Candy! Love love LOVE it!! I don't think she ever tries too hard to be sexy, let alone "often". She is the definition of sexy in my opinion. Of course her body, eyes, face etc, are all sexy, but just the way she moves, and the expressions she makes, in my opinion that is a big factor in her "sexiness". I can't really explain it, but I don't ever get the impression that her being sexy is forced, it always seems so natural to me, and that is part of the reason it is so sexy. Same goes for her being relaxed, in my opinion, she almost always seems completely relaxed in any setting. I really can't think of one example of what your talking about. On a different note, Candice looks incredibly stunning in those videos, she is truly beautiful and talented. I think the 3rd one is my favorite, but what are the videos for? At the end they said www.CandiceSwanepoel.com, is that what they were made for?

That photo is a re-issue from her January 2013 GQ Portugal shoot isn't it? They have magazines in Portugal? Yes. That I know of, Sara Sampaio has been in GQ Portugal, as previously mentioned, but also she has been in Vogue Portugal a handful of times, and Elle Portugal a few times, and she has been in GQ Portugal more than once. If they have those magazines, I think it's safe to say they have many others besides.

@VampireHorde "Oh, and if being thin is considered a eating disorder, then does being fat mean you have an "eating order"? Someone clear this up." I don't think being skinny should mean you have an eating disorder. That is especially true when the person is very fit, and obviously has a good deal of muscle tone. You can't have muscle tone like Candice, Karlie, Izabel, Miranda, etc etc, if your malnourished, and having an eating disorder would mean your malnourished. You just can't build muscle like that if your not healthy and eating right. In my opinion the real eating disorder is when someone is clearly overweight and unhealthy. On another note, Candice looks freaking adorable in the photo above, that face she is making is so cute. I am so used to seeing her look seductive and sexy, or smoking hot, and I love photos of her like that, because Candice is the definition of sexy in my book, but it is always nice to see a cute fun photo of her from time to time.

I completely agree.

That photo is a re-issue from her January 2013 GQ Portugal shoot isn't it?

You make some good points, and I really hate how some people automatically think a skinnier model must have an eating disorder, or that they are unhealthy in some way, that to me is ridiculous. With that said, I was not alive to see models in the 80's, but it is clear that model popularity has declined in recent years, and I really wish it were different. I guess it's up to people like us to make them more popular again haha.

That would be awesome, but we all know that's never gonna happen... But I really hope that this shoot is for another Vogue cover! (look at us being greedy for Vogue covers since she's got three in a row... Now we're spoiled lol) i dont know. why? Because there are hardly any fashion models on the cover of Vogue US, so you have to be a big deal in business to get there. Within the last decade, only models like Gisele Bündchen, Natalia Vodianova or Liya Kebede made it on the cover. Well, and then Kate Upton of course who became the new sensation. But look at all the other important models who didn't get a cover... It's just very unlikely in general. And Candice unfortunately is still too unpopular and not known enough, so her chances are even lower. I still think it could happen sometime, maybe not soon, but I definitely wouldn't say never. Especially if Victoria's Secret keeps blasting out all things Candice, the way they have been. All that will eventually make people in general more aware of her, even if they don't follow VS like most of us do. If Kate Upton can make the cover of American Vogue, then I have to believe Candice can. Then again, it is America we are talking about here, so your probably right, they are ridiculous when it comes to amazing models like Candice.

What a great shoot, Sara looks so beautiful.

If only Nina really had three identical twin (if that's even the right word) sisters!