MV007

I'd be surprised if it's Barbara. I think she's gorgeous and I'm a fan but I thought last years pictures were underwhelming and I didn't think any of them looked like a typical cover. 

Don't know if this is known but kimmell shoots in LA. 

It means the magazine comes out soon. 

i find it hard to believe that si would go through all the trouble they have in years past to keep the cover a secret only to reveal it a week early this year. 

At this point Chrissy is like a kardashian. It doesn't matter if people actually like her (and I think the general public does) people talk about her and she sells. 

I actually think the political stuff favors her. I don't know if you've noticed but if you publicly support trump you will be endlessly shamed and if you trash trump you will be endlessly praised. Any backlash for the political commentary will be relegated to anecdotal social media proclamations from right wingers and maybe a short segment on Fox News. The publicity would far outweigh any backlash in my opinion. And of course if there were backlash Chrissy wouldn't be able to keep her loud mouth shut and it would keep SI in the news which is always a good thing. 

Her ass deserves higher quality pictures

On 1/5/2017 at 4:28 PM, MarVS said:

they need to STOP  seriously.... Ashley formula worked and took all the hype about Ronda and Hailey  but bringing this Girl Tara who is straight up FAT AF. its not looking good for a PR smart move. they did it with Ashley is not gonna happen again . plus the Target is mostly guys .

 

#bringbackthehotgirls 

This is the problem. The target audience is males 18-54. They can pretend to be noble and progressive but the fact is the issue relies on men buying their issue. As one of those men, with every overweight model they include I get that much closer to cancelling my subscription and not buying the issue. They can do what they want and I don't have an intellectual opposition to using plus sized models. I just don't want to look at them in a bathing suit. 

The transgender thing is coming, I have no doubt. In fact I wouldn't say it's a terrible idea because the publicity would be outrageous but again as a straight male, I would not find that attractive. 

43 minutes ago, willmccarthy said:

I reckon the photographer was miles away.

Thats a shame. I feel like it's a tease with the picture quality being that poor. Beggars can't be choosers though. 

Good lord. Is there anyway we'll get those Miami candids in uhq?

I wanted to add to the discussion regarding friendships of the angels.  I know they're not angels but Rachel and Devon are really entertaining together on snapchat. 

1 hour ago, Emerods said:

 

Why would they cover Bella's boobs? They're her best asset. 

4 minutes ago, unali said:

I have a feeling that this year rating will be all time low, and if that happens I think we will have 2 more years of VS show max and that will be it. They screwed everything majorly to the point of no return, they alienated all their customers older than 13 years old so I think in few tears they will admit defeat, turn VS into PINK only(they are more than halfway there) and they will sell sports bra, pajamas with "edgy quotes" like DANCE ALL NIGHT or underwear with even edgier quotes like YOUR BOYFRIEND SAYS HI and they will call it a day. 

Of course ratings will go down. Ratings have been declining for everything. I wouldn't read too much into it unless they decline dramatically. When NFL football has declining ratings then no one is immune. 

10 minutes ago, Prettyphile said:

Her face........ I didn't realize the different

 

Is that 2016 pic for real? That looks so bad I have to think it's been doctored

Jeez, I better get my post count up. I'm really loving Josephine. She seems like the only one willing to show cleavage right now. 

6 minutes ago, Clauds said:

 

It's all matter of taste tho, I know several people who love seeing Ashley in a bikini or lingerie, and while she is not favorite woman I would much rather see her in a bikini than  a certain other SI model whose tits are pointing to different planets and freaks me out because she's like a Barbie: 100% plastic 

 

And also I'm pretty sure Ashley ain't there to please men tbh, she's there to bring publicity (which she does) and sell them swimsuits to the annoying "real women have curves" "big girls are hot" "size 14 ain't fat" crowd. The male reaction to Ashley may not have been the best out there but lots of women were thrilled and SI had more headlines and press thanks to Ashley than with any other cover model besides Kate Upton in the past decade or so, so it clearly worked, so I'm pretty sure we're stuck with her for a while.  

No argument here. I didn't mean to suggest there was nobody who liked Ashley. I was being a little rhetorical in trying to express my opinion. 

Do you think Ashley's presence will have a similar effect this time around in terms of publicity? Or will she just be there like every other model. I ask because I agree with you she definitely brought the attention like Kate upton. But Kate upton was able to keep the publicity whenever she was in the magazine so it would make a certain amount of sense to give her special treatment. 

30 minutes ago, RIP_Cabrini_Green said:

 

This has already been dissected at great depth in last years S.I. Thread. 

Yea and she's back in 2017. And si just released this video showcasing the swimsuit edition. I figured this was the best forum to bring it up in since it was the most visceral reaction I had and I immediately thought about her being in the up coming issue. 

So I know this is a battle already lost but it struck me as I was watching the latest "making of" documentary for the 2016 issue. But why is Ashley graham in this again?  In her segment they put together a montage of her, lily aldridge, Haley clauson, Emily d and they're all writhing around in tiny bikinis and the other models look unbelievable and then it inevitably cuts to Ashley and it's ridiculous. I don't want to call her names but these other girls have bodies to die for and bodies that I want to look at. Even girls in the magazine that I don't prefer usually have assets that I can appreciate. Ashley not so much. Not in a bikini at least. I just hope SI and the media are done patting themselves on the back and she doesn't take over the media tour like last year. 

I think by the last post that gave a model rundown there was no mention of Gigi. Of course the spider shit creeps me out so I skip over a large number of posts in this forum so correct me if I'm wrong. Do we know if she won't be in the issue?

It's days like today that I am reminded how Kate upton became famous and why I was a fan. She's got a great, fun personality when she allows it to come out. It's too bad we only see it every 2 years now. She became a star because she was herself. She's become a little irellellavant because she hides who she really is and pretends she's boring af. 

I love the typical look of the VS models but I think Rachel offers an alternative body type that is attractive and worth being used to promote their product. 

I haven't been following this for all that long but is there any word on Kendall and Gigi for this year?  I would guess that if they were they would've confirmed already. 

If I had never heard Sam speak then she would be an absolute favorite of mine. 

On July 31, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Sanni said:

Does she mean that she does 90 of those ab moves??

 

ETA

Or that she does 3 sets of 10 ab moves so in total 30 ab moves?

Having seen the results in the thousands of pictures in this thread, I would guess the highest number possible. 

I've never hated a jacket so much