gosia walczak

9 Isabeli Fontana 10 Carmen Kass 11 Marloes Horst 12 Maryna Linchuk 13 Hilary Rhoda 14 Christy Turlington 15 Laetitia Casta 16 Linda Evangelista

Calvin Klein Swim S/S 11 ph: Sebastian Kim thanks minus 1

source Siara TFS

terrysdiary

Inspired for Matthew Williamson F/W 2008 http://modillustr.blogspot.com/

Elle (PL) shot by Piotr Porebski kes-ke.livejournal

photographer Dimitri Hyacinthe source Ania Cywińska

Thanks Joe

photographer David Joseph Perez source Ania Cywińska

Marloes Horst by the studio of Terry Richardson nudity terrysdiary

Marloes Horst Thursday, 26.02.2009 - By Sille Henning ELLES cover model, Marloes Horst, has been the model in one and a half years. The Dutch beauty live in New York and has already made fashion series including ELLE English and Russian Vogue and now also Danish ELLE. We asked her about ... INTERNATIONAL FAVORITE DESIGNERS? Definitely Marc Jacobs and Giorgio Armani. LARGEST PHOTO EXPERIENCE TO DATE? Valentino campaign with photographer Glen Luchford. I'm still an 'up-and-coming' model, and therefore I was very surprised when I got the campaign, but it was great to get the chance. CATWALK GREATEST ADVENTURE? I've actually only been one show, and it was Prada S / S, the 2009th After Valentino campaign, I went straight to Milan and was booked. FAVORITE BEAUTY PRODUCTS? Facial Cream 'Lait-Crème Concentré' from Embryolisse. It can unfortunately only be purchased at pharmacies in Paris. And Laura Mercier concealer, den er jeg blevet anbefaletpå mange fotooptagelser. (really have not a clue what this means FAVORITE PERFUME? Kenzo 'Flower'. My best friend used it forever, and I was ecstatic with the fragrance. Now it is my perfume. ALWAYS IN BAG? My phone, my concealer and chewing gum. BEST SHOP SITE? New York secondhand stores. If you have many basic things in her wardrobe from, for example. H & M, one can easily create its own style by mixing with vintage. London is also a good shoppeby. They dry more, but there are just so expensive. FAVORITE THINGS in the closet? Underwear. I met a model who said: 'Why go in bad underwear when you can go to the delicious? " - And it's true. Now I love it. Underwear drawer is my favorite drawer in the dresser. BEST STYLINGTIP? "The mirror never lies'. Do not buy too small pants; the tensioner and it bulges out over the waistband - it is not smart. Buy them one size bigger so they fit nicely, rather than to rejoice that you can close a smaller size thanks Forrest TFS http://www.elle.dk/Mode/Backstage/Marloe%20Shorst.aspx

photographer Claudia Fessler nudity source claudia-fessler

Models Sue Agency For $3.75 Million Three high-profile models have sued their former agency, Next, for allegedly stealing $750,000 of their earnings. And the trio contend that the shady dealings are a pattern of conduct for Next. They want the agency to open its books. The Polish models Anna Jagodzinska and Anne Aleksandra Cywinska, together with the Estonian Karmen Pedaru, are accusing Next of failing to pay them money they were owed, and of misappropriating those funds for Next's own use. Jagodzinska (center) and Pedaru (right) are extremely successful models; between them, they have graced the covers of American Vogue, Italian Vogue, Australian Vogue, and Japanese Vogue, walked for Chanel, Givenchy, and Valentino couture, and been the faces of brands including Oscar de la Renta, David Yurman, Prada, Tom Ford, and Bottega Veneta. Cywinska (left), who works under the name Ania, has a less high-profile career, but she has modeled successfully in New York, Spain, Australia, and Germany, and her clients have recently included Saks Fifth Avenue and Nordstrom. Full disclosure: when I modeled, Next was my agency in New York and in Los Angeles. I have met Jagodzinska and Cywinska socially. Cywinska was the room-mate of a friend when both were tenants in one of Next's models' apartments. When I left Next, in the summer of 2009, Next paid me my outstanding earnings in full and in a manner I considered timely. Pedaru, Jagodzinska, and Cywinska all left Next in April of 2010. Their lawsuit, a copy of which I obtained, alleges that when they switched agencies, each had earnings left outstanding, including some payments still pending from jobs going back to mid-2009, and that in the ensuing months, Next has flatly refused to pay up. That would be a little like if you quit your job the day before your pay period ended, only to find that your former employer felt entitled to keep your last paycheck. Pedaru claims in the suit that she is owed "an amount not presently ascertainable, but believed to exceed $400,000." Jagodzinska estimates the earnings Next withheld at $320,000. Cywinska says she is owed $30,000. Each woman is seeking punitive damages of $1 million. When the three models broke with Next and switched to the competing agency Ford, Next sued Ford for allegedly offering them unlawful enticements to break their contracts. That lawsuit is ongoing. In their suit, Jagodzinska, Pedaru, and Cywinska argue that they never would have left Next had it honored their contracts by paying them their money on time in the first place. Modeling agencies do not employ models — models are independent contractors who are paid by their clients. However, agencies hold significant control, financial and otherwise, over the women and men they represent. Agencies give models notice of castings, handle models' resulting bookings and invoice their clients, then agencies disburse those earnings to models, less fees and expenses. Models are dependent on agencies to find work. Agency contracts typically give agencies a monopoly on managing a given model's image in a given geographical area, and in New York, agencies generally take 20% of each model's earnings, plus any management expenses the agency says it has incurred, and often plus an additional 20% booking fee charged to the client. (Sometimes surprisingly large deductions for things like photocopying, messenger services, and for being on the agency website are common, even at high-profile agencies.) In addition, if a model passing through town needs accommodation, agencies are generally only too happy to make the necessary arrangements — generally by booking her a berth in one of the apartments they maintain for the purpose. And, of course, charging her for the privilege. One month in New York sharing an agency 1-bedroom with two other girls might cost a model $2,000. Those costs and fees are not really negotiable. If your account says the agency spent $178.84 on Fed-Ex on your behalf during the month of May, you just have to eat it, because they certainly aren't going to show you a receipt. If these costs incurred push your agency account into the red, then congratulations: you now have what's known as agency debt. Most models go in and out of debt to their agencies frequently during their careers, often racking up thousands of dollars worth of debt in a competitive market like New York or Paris, only to be sent by their agencies to work it off in less-fashionable but more lucrative markets like Germany and Australia. Rinse and repeat. Modeling industry accounting can be quite opaque, from the model's perspective. You have to trust your agency completely with all of your financial affairs — "trust" being the operative word, because not much protects you, as an independent contractor in a largely unregulated labor market. Although a model should technically be allowed to request to see her agency account at any time, the typical modeling contract pre-authorizes the agency to make whatever deductions it feels necessary without seeking any model's consent. And while expenses are typically debited from a model's account as soon as they are incurred, payments are only credited when they are received from clients — which can take months, or never happen at all. It is not uncommon for an agency to refuse take measures against deadbeat clients; to an agency, the production house or brand that stiffed that one girl over that one job may represent hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bookings per annum for dozens of other girls. The potential cost of that one model leaving the agency — if she even did leave — is almost always lower than the potential cost of displeasing that production house or brand. It is very, very common for models to experience difficulties recovering money that is owed them after leaving an agency; it is rare, however, for models to litigate over such instances of apparent theft. Most unusually, Pedaru, Jagodzinska, and Cwyinska's lawsuit alleges that Next's financial misconduct was so egregious and so systematic that other models are very likely to have experienced similar pilfering of their earnings. The three plaintiffs are suing in part to force Next to open its books to allow the court to examine its alleged "willful...pattern of and course of conduct of withholding compensation from models." These three women say they have reason to believe that Next's breach of fiduciary duty "spans many years" and affects many other victims. If the judge allows that to happen, this could prove to be a very interesting lawsuit, indeed. http://jezebel.com/5698562/models-sue-agen...tm_medium=email

Models Sue Agency For $3.75 Million Three high-profile models have sued their former agency, Next, for allegedly stealing $750,000 of their earnings. And the trio contend that the shady dealings are a pattern of conduct for Next. They want the agency to open its books. The Polish models Anna Jagodzinska and Anne Aleksandra Cywinska, together with the Estonian Karmen Pedaru, are accusing Next of failing to pay them money they were owed, and of misappropriating those funds for Next's own use. Jagodzinska (center) and Pedaru (right) are extremely successful models; between them, they have graced the covers of American Vogue, Italian Vogue, Australian Vogue, and Japanese Vogue, walked for Chanel, Givenchy, and Valentino couture, and been the faces of brands including Oscar de la Renta, David Yurman, Prada, Tom Ford, and Bottega Veneta. Cywinska (left), who works under the name Ania, has a less high-profile career, but she has modeled successfully in New York, Spain, Australia, and Germany, and her clients have recently included Saks Fifth Avenue and Nordstrom. Full disclosure: when I modeled, Next was my agency in New York and in Los Angeles. I have met Jagodzinska and Cywinska socially. Cywinska was the room-mate of a friend when both were tenants in one of Next's models' apartments. When I left Next, in the summer of 2009, Next paid me my outstanding earnings in full and in a manner I considered timely. Pedaru, Jagodzinska, and Cywinska all left Next in April of 2010. Their lawsuit, a copy of which I obtained, alleges that when they switched agencies, each had earnings left outstanding, including some payments still pending from jobs going back to mid-2009, and that in the ensuing months, Next has flatly refused to pay up. That would be a little like if you quit your job the day before your pay period ended, only to find that your former employer felt entitled to keep your last paycheck. Pedaru claims in the suit that she is owed "an amount not presently ascertainable, but believed to exceed $400,000." Jagodzinska estimates the earnings Next withheld at $320,000. Cywinska says she is owed $30,000. Each woman is seeking punitive damages of $1 million. When the three models broke with Next and switched to the competing agency Ford, Next sued Ford for allegedly offering them unlawful enticements to break their contracts. That lawsuit is ongoing. In their suit, Jagodzinska, Pedaru, and Cywinska argue that they never would have left Next had it honored their contracts by paying them their money on time in the first place. Modeling agencies do not employ models — models are independent contractors who are paid by their clients. However, agencies hold significant control, financial and otherwise, over the women and men they represent. Agencies give models notice of castings, handle models' resulting bookings and invoice their clients, then agencies disburse those earnings to models, less fees and expenses. Models are dependent on agencies to find work. Agency contracts typically give agencies a monopoly on managing a given model's image in a given geographical area, and in New York, agencies generally take 20% of each model's earnings, plus any management expenses the agency says it has incurred, and often plus an additional 20% booking fee charged to the client. (Sometimes surprisingly large deductions for things like photocopying, messenger services, and for being on the agency website are common, even at high-profile agencies.) In addition, if a model passing through town needs accommodation, agencies are generally only too happy to make the necessary arrangements — generally by booking her a berth in one of the apartments they maintain for the purpose. And, of course, charging her for the privilege. One month in New York sharing an agency 1-bedroom with two other girls might cost a model $2,000. Those costs and fees are not really negotiable. If your account says the agency spent $178.84 on Fed-Ex on your behalf during the month of May, you just have to eat it, because they certainly aren't going to show you a receipt. If these costs incurred push your agency account into the red, then congratulations: you now have what's known as agency debt. Most models go in and out of debt to their agencies frequently during their careers, often racking up thousands of dollars worth of debt in a competitive market like New York or Paris, only to be sent by their agencies to work it off in less-fashionable but more lucrative markets like Germany and Australia. Rinse and repeat. Modeling industry accounting can be quite opaque, from the model's perspective. You have to trust your agency completely with all of your financial affairs — "trust" being the operative word, because not much protects you, as an independent contractor in a largely unregulated labor market. Although a model should technically be allowed to request to see her agency account at any time, the typical modeling contract pre-authorizes the agency to make whatever deductions it feels necessary without seeking any model's consent. And while expenses are typically debited from a model's account as soon as they are incurred, payments are only credited when they are received from clients — which can take months, or never happen at all. It is not uncommon for an agency to refuse take measures against deadbeat clients; to an agency, the production house or brand that stiffed that one girl over that one job may represent hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bookings per annum for dozens of other girls. The potential cost of that one model leaving the agency — if she even did leave — is almost always lower than the potential cost of displeasing that production house or brand. It is very, very common for models to experience difficulties recovering money that is owed them after leaving an agency; it is rare, however, for models to litigate over such instances of apparent theft. Most unusually, Pedaru, Jagodzinska, and Cwyinska's lawsuit alleges that Next's financial misconduct was so egregious and so systematic that other models are very likely to have experienced similar pilfering of their earnings. The three plaintiffs are suing in part to force Next to open its books to allow the court to examine its alleged "willful...pattern of and course of conduct of withholding compensation from models." These three women say they have reason to believe that Next's breach of fiduciary duty "spans many years" and affects many other victims. If the judge allows that to happen, this could prove to be a very interesting lawsuit, indeed. http://jezebel.com/5698562/models-sue-agen...tm_medium=email

Models Sue Agency For $3.75 Million Three high-profile models have sued their former agency, Next, for allegedly stealing $750,000 of their earnings. And the trio contend that the shady dealings are a pattern of conduct for Next. They want the agency to open its books. The Polish models Anna Jagodzinska and Anne Aleksandra Cywinska, together with the Estonian Karmen Pedaru, are accusing Next of failing to pay them money they were owed, and of misappropriating those funds for Next's own use. Jagodzinska (center) and Pedaru (right) are extremely successful models; between them, they have graced the covers of American Vogue, Italian Vogue, Australian Vogue, and Japanese Vogue, walked for Chanel, Givenchy, and Valentino couture, and been the faces of brands including Oscar de la Renta, David Yurman, Prada, Tom Ford, and Bottega Veneta. Cywinska (left), who works under the name Ania, has a less high-profile career, but she has modeled successfully in New York, Spain, Australia, and Germany, and her clients have recently included Saks Fifth Avenue and Nordstrom. Full disclosure: when I modeled, Next was my agency in New York and in Los Angeles. I have met Jagodzinska and Cywinska socially. Cywinska was the room-mate of a friend when both were tenants in one of Next's models' apartments. When I left Next, in the summer of 2009, Next paid me my outstanding earnings in full and in a manner I considered timely. Pedaru, Jagodzinska, and Cywinska all left Next in April of 2010. Their lawsuit, a copy of which I obtained, alleges that when they switched agencies, each had earnings left outstanding, including some payments still pending from jobs going back to mid-2009, and that in the ensuing months, Next has flatly refused to pay up. That would be a little like if you quit your job the day before your pay period ended, only to find that your former employer felt entitled to keep your last paycheck. Pedaru claims in the suit that she is owed "an amount not presently ascertainable, but believed to exceed $400,000." Jagodzinska estimates the earnings Next withheld at $320,000. Cywinska says she is owed $30,000. Each woman is seeking punitive damages of $1 million. When the three models broke with Next and switched to the competing agency Ford, Next sued Ford for allegedly offering them unlawful enticements to break their contracts. That lawsuit is ongoing. In their suit, Jagodzinska, Pedaru, and Cywinska argue that they never would have left Next had it honored their contracts by paying them their money on time in the first place. Modeling agencies do not employ models — models are independent contractors who are paid by their clients. However, agencies hold significant control, financial and otherwise, over the women and men they represent. Agencies give models notice of castings, handle models' resulting bookings and invoice their clients, then agencies disburse those earnings to models, less fees and expenses. Models are dependent on agencies to find work. Agency contracts typically give agencies a monopoly on managing a given model's image in a given geographical area, and in New York, agencies generally take 20% of each model's earnings, plus any management expenses the agency says it has incurred, and often plus an additional 20% booking fee charged to the client. (Sometimes surprisingly large deductions for things like photocopying, messenger services, and for being on the agency website are common, even at high-profile agencies.) In addition, if a model passing through town needs accommodation, agencies are generally only too happy to make the necessary arrangements — generally by booking her a berth in one of the apartments they maintain for the purpose. And, of course, charging her for the privilege. One month in New York sharing an agency 1-bedroom with two other girls might cost a model $2,000. Those costs and fees are not really negotiable. If your account says the agency spent $178.84 on Fed-Ex on your behalf during the month of May, you just have to eat it, because they certainly aren't going to show you a receipt. If these costs incurred push your agency account into the red, then congratulations: you now have what's known as agency debt. Most models go in and out of debt to their agencies frequently during their careers, often racking up thousands of dollars worth of debt in a competitive market like New York or Paris, only to be sent by their agencies to work it off in less-fashionable but more lucrative markets like Germany and Australia. Rinse and repeat. Modeling industry accounting can be quite opaque, from the model's perspective. You have to trust your agency completely with all of your financial affairs — "trust" being the operative word, because not much protects you, as an independent contractor in a largely unregulated labor market. Although a model should technically be allowed to request to see her agency account at any time, the typical modeling contract pre-authorizes the agency to make whatever deductions it feels necessary without seeking any model's consent. And while expenses are typically debited from a model's account as soon as they are incurred, payments are only credited when they are received from clients — which can take months, or never happen at all. It is not uncommon for an agency to refuse take measures against deadbeat clients; to an agency, the production house or brand that stiffed that one girl over that one job may represent hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bookings per annum for dozens of other girls. The potential cost of that one model leaving the agency — if she even did leave — is almost always lower than the potential cost of displeasing that production house or brand. It is very, very common for models to experience difficulties recovering money that is owed them after leaving an agency; it is rare, however, for models to litigate over such instances of apparent theft. Most unusually, Pedaru, Jagodzinska, and Cwyinska's lawsuit alleges that Next's financial misconduct was so egregious and so systematic that other models are very likely to have experienced similar pilfering of their earnings. The three plaintiffs are suing in part to force Next to open its books to allow the court to examine its alleged "willful...pattern of and course of conduct of withholding compensation from models." These three women say they have reason to believe that Next's breach of fiduciary duty "spans many years" and affects many other victims. If the judge allows that to happen, this could prove to be a very interesting lawsuit, indeed. http://jezebel.com/5698562/models-sue-agen...tm_medium=email

Beautiful Story Night in Warsaw facebook StyleOff.pl ph. Suza&Rebell

October 10, 2009 Interview - Marloes Horst (Next) Marloes Horst, from the Netherlands, is a star in the making. Her career took off with walking the Prada SS09 show and booking a Valentino Fragrance campaign by Glenn Luchford. A Numero Tokyo editorial and a Sportmax Code campaign as well as a Vogue Hommes International editorial by star photographer Terry Richardson ensued. Skipping most of the shows in Febuary 2009 Marloes went back on the runways during the recent Fashionweek, walking for Topshop Unique. Meanwhile some prestigious magazines like Vogue Russia, Vogue Germany, Dazed & Confuzed and Elle demanded Marloes. Not to forget about her getting booked for the new Pirelli Calender (alognside Abbey Lee, Lily Cole and a handful of many other top girls). Currently on the new cover of L’Officiel, Marloes answered our questions from a hotel room in Los Angeles. 1. Marloes, you applied to an agency in 2007, right? When did you get interested in this industry and who convinced you to apply? Curious is more the word. I'm from a small village in Holland and of course we read some magazines and watched TV, but I never was really into fashion. Just the thought of being one of those girls in the magazine was cool. My best friend and me made some pictures in her garden and sent them to agencies. I got some reactions back and I went to visite them. That's how it all started. Just some young girls' dream that came true in the end. My friend ended up being a make up artist! 2. In what way has your life changed? Do you work as full time model now? My life changed big time! First I was scared about going to Amsterdam and now I live in New York. I'm a much more social and grown up person. I finished my high school and then started full time modeling. At the same time all my friends went on to study and I needed to create my own life that time. Travelling alone over the world, meeting and staying with people I never knew before. It took me a while to addept to this fashion industry life, people judging and talking about every single thing of me. But now I'm a strong person and I'm living an amazing live! 3. Do you think that it's important to educate in school before going abroad for jobs? Yes, yes yes. I'm so glad that I've already finished my high school. When you're a starting model nothing guarantees you a well payed modeling career. If faith kicks in and it doesnt work out being a model, you can start your school year all over again or looking for a job without any graduation. And moreover, modeling is nothing for dumb people. You need to be aware of the world you will be travelling in on your own. 4. Is it actually difficult to balance out your job from your private life? Can you plan things like spending time with your friends & family or vacations in advance? It's hard putting family on a second place. Getting a great job doesn't mean it will take you to the next level. There are so many maybes in this world. So, saying no to family events because you've got a job that maybe will change your career is tough. Especially when you live abroad and need to cancel a moment to see your family. Planning in advance is not happening in this world! I don't know what I am doing tomorrow or where I will be! It's a fast and last minute industry. August and Christmas are the two 'legal' moments to say no and see your family and I never let that chance go by. 5. What would you say was your breakthrough moment? The Prada show gave me a great boost. 6. With reference to your jobs: Do you have some kind of codecision or does always the agency decide which jobs to do? The agency always tells what kind of jobs I’m in option for and they advice me. You talk about what way you and your agency want to present and push you. Every model has her own road to take. 7. Do you remember the moment when you booked the Valentino fragrance campaign? Tell us, what was it like and how did you feel. I was in a tent in France! I was road tripping at the time with some friends. It was amazing and I couldn’t believe it. I asked the agency if the client was sure HAHA 8. Who taught you basics like posing, walking, how to look into a camera or was it more of learning by doing? Learning by doing. You need to find your own way in front of the camera. Photographers give you tips in the start, like watching your neck or not making your hands look like a big lump etc. These are little things you just need to learn by doing it over and over again. By looking at your pictures and seek for improvement. 9. Regarding editorials and campaigns: Do you prefer "only girl" or "multi girl" stories? “Only girl” I guess... I like to have chemistry with the crew and especially with the photographer. With multi girls it's usually harder to get that effect. 10. Do you still have to go to castings for eds/ads or do you get everything by direct booking? Of course I have to do castings. I did great stuff but I’m not a Kate Moss or Gisele yet! 11. How does a killer body like yours stay in shape? I have a trainer in New York. I go to the O-diesel studio and train with Oscar. He trains a lot of models and makes working out fun! When I’m somewhere else I run and do exercises in my hotel room. 12. Has there ever been a job you were totally looking forward to but was unfortunately cancelled in the last minute? Not that I recall, I think I blocked that out of my memories 13. Seriously, you're on the top. So it would be very interesting to know: are you still excited when you get booked for a big job? Yeeeessss I get crazy excited and still get nervous all the time! The bigger the job, the bigger the expectations from the model. I research about the style of the brand or of a photographer and try to be a little prepared, but every shoot is different and you need to make it your own. That gives me a lot of pressure. 14. Referring to the Pirelli shooting: Was it actually so relaxing like it looks on the pictures? Where has it been photographed and how much time did the shooting take? The Pirelli shooting was amazing. We shot in Brazil, Trancoso. At daytime on the beach and around the resort during night. Because there was a lot of nudity a relaxed vibe was really important at the shoot . Being comfortable with the other girls and the crew that’s surrounding you during the shooting. It turned out great, we all got along so well that after the first day it was something like a big holiday with pictures. I was in the first group and we stayed for 5 days. At the 5th day the second group came and we had press day. Group 2 stayed for 2 days after we left. The shooting days were long: Starting at 8 and roughly ending at 1 am. 15. Anything you would advice new models to wear to a casting? Always wear heels. It shows that you put effort in the casting and that you respect the client. Also you should wear something that shows off your body in a good way. That can be a shirt and jeans or a dress with tights, whatever you feel comfortable in. Remember that there will be a lot of girls at a casting. Try to get a personal style so you can stand out. 16. Is it a strange feeling to have some kind of fans who are supporting you and talking about your work like on thefashionspot.com? They are incredible! They know when magazines come out before the agency does. It's an amazing feeling people follow and support you like that. Ok sometimes there are bad things written about a shoot, but everybody has his own own opinion and I respect that. It's good to hear the negative side though.. It makes you thinking. 17. Now in the end: Tell us one thing you'd like the world to know! Well my mom is my biggest fan. So I want to dedicate this question to her and put the spotlights on her for a change! Ik hald fan dei ! Thank you for the detalied answers on our qestions, Marloes ! http://www.digitaldiamonds.de/2009/10/inte...horst-next.html

photographer King Redman fordmodels

tumblr

Beautiful Story Night in Warsaw 23 November ,the newly-opened Reserved store in Warsaw hosted a “Beautiful Story Night”, organized by Reserved and sponsored by Elle and Chilli ZET. reserved-fashion.blogspot

thanks Berno

Warsaw Fashion Week - Mikolaj Komar, Ania Cywińska facebook Ania

Models Sue Next for Ripping Them Off From left, Anna Maria Jagodzinska, Anna Aleksandra Cywinska, and Karmen Pedaru. Photo: Imaxtree, Patrickmcmullan.com A few months ago, Next modeling agency sued Ford for supposedly stealing moneymaking honeys Anna Aleksandra Cywinska, Anna Maria Jagodzinska, and Karmen Pedaru. Now those three models are suing Next, which represents Karlie Kloss among other top names, for "collecting and converting hundreds of thousands of dollars of their earmarked compensation remitted by third parties for bookings in the United States," according to the court documents. Pedaru claims Next owes her at least $400,000 and should pay her $1 million in punitive damages, according to the models’ lawyer Jennifer Bougher. Jagodzinska is out $230,000 and Cywinska was taken for $30,000, they claimed. Both are also seeking $1 million in punitive damages. Damn. Those girls bank. Let's all become models! Or not. http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/11/mod...ripping_th.html

Marloes for Calvin Klein facebook Calvin Klein

photographer :Tim Barber tim-barber