rockTheSky

it was not to impress guys as I am happily taken.

Right, yes, because being taken aka being in a relationship means there is no need to impress anyone with your looks anymore. No need to bother dressing up nice when you go out, or wearing make-up anymore, because you're taken, right? The mentality of looking sexy and having a healthy image, including taking care over your appearance drops off after you enter into a relationship. And of course, you wouldn't want to impress your bf (a guy).[/sarcasm]

Don't be so quick to judge, because it is a very, very private and personal decision that each woman has to make on her own.

Judge... judge what? Don't be so quick to accuse me of judging anything as a means to provide you with something to hit back at. I said the only possible reason I can think of. I didn't claim that to BE A reason though. I also didn't express what I thought of that possible reason. Please read more carefully.

Every woman has her own personal reason for wanting larger breasts or getting plastic surgery. [...] I love my new larger breasts and I would do it all over again if I had to. It was so worth it!

I just think of it as absurd when I think: has society really come to the point where it is so absolutely crucial for women to attain "beauty" even if it means having plastic surgery? With respect to altering something on your face; wear a mask if you're so ashamed... and if you're religious it's even worse. What an insult it would be to God to whimsically lop your nose off, have implants and liposuction all at once. Heck, forget God. What about your ancestors, your blood line. What a disgrace.

One person's view.

I just can't understand people who want bigger boobs I mean look at Kate Hudson... she has the smallest breasts I have ever noticed in an actress and she doesn't even seem to care about it And that's why I like her - she is perfectly happy the way she is and doesn't want to change anything

DAMN. I never even noticed she has small breasts and I've seen a couple of films she's been in supporting acts or w/e. It's true though, and I don't think that much press is made about it either, unlike Keira Knightly. Although she's another one who doesn't seem to care much.

I am totally with you though, despite not being a girl, I can't understand why girls would want bigger breasts either. The only possible reason I can think of is for guys, to impress the guys.

just to be happy I hate people who live just for money

I guess you hate me then.

I live for money. The truth is money is important to everyone. Look at people who are rich and who get rich. They could just stash the money into a private account and live comfortably off the money for the rest of their lives, but they carry on making it. Look at Kirk Kerkorian... he's 91 and he's still in the news for unloading his stake in Ford and buying more shares in MGM Mirrage. He should be retired and enjoying his wealth. Look at people like Warren Buffet who are so incredibly rich. Sure, they live modestly, but that doesn't mean money isn't important to him. For him, I would imagine the money he has is simply a measure of his success. It is therefore important to him. I hate the way people think that just because some rich people don't buy loads of material possessions that money is not important to them.

I live for money because I have a loving family who support me and some fantastic friends.

What happens if you loose all your money?

First of all, that's rather unlikely. You don't just lose all your money one day. There is usually a reason someone loses any amount of money. Anyway, when I say I live for money, I sort of mean it like that's the last desire. It's the last piece of the pie (in order to make the pie complete).

just to be happy I hate people who live just for money

I guess you hate me then.

I live for money. The truth is money is important to everyone. Look at people who are rich and who get rich. They could just stash the money into a private account and live comfortably off the money for the rest of their lives, but they carry on making it. Look at Kirk Kerkorian... he's 91 and he's still in the news for unloading his stake in Ford and buying more shares in MGM Mirrage. He should be retired and enjoying his wealth. Look at people like Warren Buffet who are so incredibly rich. Sure, they live modestly, but that doesn't mean money isn't important to him. For him, I would imagine the money he has is simply a measure of his success. It is therefore important to him. I hate the way people think that just because some rich people don't buy loads of material possessions that money is not important to them.

I live for money because I have a loving family who support me and some fantastic friends.

I can't wait for summer to be over so

So? SO what? So nothing! That's a horrible thing to say. lol

No one should ever hope or wish for summer to be over. Long holiday, nice weather, chilling with friends.

Not sure ethnicity has much to do with boob size and/or body shape. It is a fact what is eaten and how much someone excersizes plays a large role in your shape. But if you see people who look similar to each other I would bet it has to do with similar lifestyles.

Ethnicity seems to play a relative part in body shape. Not so sure specifically about breasts though. If we take the more broad ethic groups, the differences probably come from a their ancestors and because of their culture. Obviously food and exercise play a role too - no doubt, but I think it's less.

If you see people who look similar to each other, It would probably be down to genes rather than lifestyle (more often than not). You ever wonder why Alessandra Ambrosio can go on Craig Kilborn and upon being asked how many times a month she works out can give the response: "two days a month", and later go on to confess "I eat candy, and chocolate. A lot of chocolate. I eat it every day". It always annoys me when magazines have articles of women, celebs or whatever, and in the promo photos they're wearing a bikini looking stunning and slim, then in the article they're always asked how they keep such a great shape, what their work out routine is or how much they exercise. The interviewee typically gives an answer like: "you know, I am actually quite lazy and don't work out as much as I should", "I don't work out" or "I go to the gymn once a week". People seem to forget that a slim figure can also be the product of inherited genes - HOW TO LOOK LIKE KATE MOSS: 5 GREAT TIPS; be born with it, le duh!

I mean, Asian cultures like the Chinese are typically very small. Japanese people typically have small frames (they're slim) and they don't have a major obesity problem in JPN as they do in the U.S - whilst culture, lifestyle and other factors do play a part, their body shape is related to genes and how their ancestors were. Just because Japanese people tend to be more slender than American people doesn't mean they lead any more of an active lifestyle.

Hell, I have a small frame, I've always been thin, and right now I don't do any exercise what so ever and If I'm honest I haven't for a few years. Right now, my lunches at work consist of a bottle of coke and 9 twix bars. Most people who are slim will always be thin, regardless of how much they exercise because of genes related to their ethnic background.

that just might be true

but my ass is really nice.

I recently wanted to pay a compliment to a friend of mine. She came up to me and I said, "Ooh, you've lost weight!" (mind you, she's a really slim, petite girl). She scoffed me and said: "What, so you mean I used to be fat?".

It seems that you can't even say to a girl that she has lost weight, let alone gained some.

Well, she was joking, of course. But there's always some grain of truth in every joke...

Damn, that's such a good quote. No longer will people be able to pass off their so-called humour with the disclaimer that "it was just a joke". I think most people also don't think before they open their mouth. Because, of course, it's perfectly possible to already be healthy, yet not fat, and lose weight. But she clearly took it the wrong way, and jumped to a conclusion that was neither implied. A feather can lose weight without being a brick in the first place.

I know theese are old, but...

if a guy's really hot and has no personality i won't go out with him...okay, maybe j/k I need both to got out with a guy .

Oh please, stop kidding yourself, you so would go out with him. I believe the term is 'arm candy'.

just as long as the guy is strong and he can fight

I mean I don't want him to be stupid,just average is okay.

Why would you want that in a guy? Like, I mean, don't say in responce: "well, I don't want him to get beaten down in a fight" - surely you'd want a bf who doesn't get into fights in the first place, like most civilized people manage to?

I'm kinda seeing some girl right now, our meetings are usually centered around sex and stuff, we even talk frequently about sex - totally openly, without inhibitions. She has a nice personality, she's funny and all, but to be honest - she's not the prettiest girl around. And I've been having these doubts lately... I like her as a friend, but I wouldn't see myself in a relationship with her... Not necessarily just because of looks... But nevertheless, looks ARE a factor. She has chubby legs and thighs, a flat ass and, uhm, a mediocre face. And she seems to value our "relationship" too much. I told her that she can't expect anything serious from me, and I hope she still knows that, although we got intimate a few times and she's probably thinking that this must lead to a regular, committed relationship. But all I want is a casual relationship. So, it's not as simple as "I'd rather have an UGLY girl, but with braaainzzz"...

I know I probably sound totally rude, but the fact is that I can't neglect the physical aspect.

You actually sound totally sincere and honest, which is really rare as people try to beat about the bush too much these days, trying too hard not to offend anyone. I totally get where you're coming from with that girl you described though; I've had a few female friends like that in the past. Luckily everyone clings onto gender stereotypes like there's no tomorrow, thus giving you the power to decide whether to instigate a relationship or not.

how do you quote someone?

By pressing the Quote button underneath their post? Le duH

Hey, before all you ladies go bashing someone looking like that [pink polo dude] It's actually those sorts of people I seem to see the girls flock around.

WHAT'S wrong with those shoes?

They're annoying... I bet you own one of those!

How much?

Admit it... we dislike you anyway.

We?

Who are you spokesman for?

Update on the shoe counting: 46 pairs of heels so far found

How many of them are Chloe, Manolos, Christian Louboutin, or Chanel?

We're not here to debate about your world view so the issue doesn't need to be broadened. In fact, no one is even interested. We're here to talk about a non-cheap, non-immitation *cough* H&M *cough* brand of quality clothing from European designers.

1. It isn't my world view; don't be naive

2. When I said "broadening the issue" I was talking about the issue of some of their clothes seeming a little inappropriate for children of their age.

4. I wasn't trying to instigate a debate, I was just adding my thoughts about the clothes.

5. Correction:

In fact, I am not even interested.

We're here to talk about a non-cheap, non-immitation *cough* H&M *cough* brand of quality clothing from European designers.

What did you think I was talking about? I was talking about how some of these clothes look on the models in the Sisley ad campaign. Le duH

I don't know if we were looking at the same collection. Sisley is edgy but still maintains a level of class. I have no idea where you got that whole "worrying about boyfriends" deal or growing up too fast deal from but that was pretty innocent to me.

Well I didn't really "get" the whole worrying about boyfriends/growing up too fast issue from anywhere. It's called broadening the issue.

Also... are you related to solo?

Why would you think I'm related to solo?

What brands do Benetton sell?

Sisley's 'Young' ad campaign is rather... I duno. The girls look about 8-9... I'm gonna get slammed for this choice of words, but I can't be bothered to think of more appropiate ones: they shouldn't be dressing like that (in some of their clothes) at their age. Everyone grows up way too fast these days. You got girls who are still in their childhood dressing in wildly inappropriate manner, and worrying about getting a boyfriend. That stuff shouldn't even matter at their age.

Well I quoted you, because you said what a lot of people say, indeed others in this thread have said it before you.

Anyway, no harm done I hope.

i wasnt doing that at all

Yes, but I did say 'everyone', which, last time I checked, doesn't single out individuals : )

needs to balance itself out sort of

if the person is really attractive, they can have a bad personality

if the person has a really good personality, they can be slightly on the bad looks side

Well it can be on the flip side too. I don't know why everyone always uses the conventional brand of thinking that automatically pairs attractiveness to lack of personality, and more average looking to better personalities.

^^We can argue on this topic all day and all night, RTS. This is a can of worms just BEGGING to be opened.

Argue? Can of worms?

Dude, I am not saying or suggesting you're right or wrong for watermarking it; I disagree that it ruins the picture. Beyond this, I was just telling it how it is: whether you like it or not, you are putting your name on something that you contributed nothing toward the creation of.

^^It's from the July issue, Moofins. I guess this would be her first domestic editorial in nearly a year, am I right? I gave the UHQ scans to my buddy at TFS and he posted it there. I figured more people would appreciate it there than here.

BTW, I'm already getting lambasted for my beautiful watermark at TFS by this guy below.

good pics completely ruined by cheap tacky senseless scanners tags. The guy who scanned them is an idiot. Thanks for posting though.

Well it doesn't really ruin it... at all, but why do you even need to put a watermark on it at all? You didn't take the photograph, you didn't write the article, or publish the magazine, you only scanned it. So you're watermarking a piece of work that is entirely someone else's, which you've made a copy of.

Do any of you girls here have Chloe shoes? If so, which ones? Iunno why I'm interested in Chloe brand all of a sudden.

nice.

Would suck to have that HDD fail though. Just had an HDD fail on me actually. lulz.

hmm - just comes up with some sort of site error.

Are there any bags or dresses that girls don't like? I mean is that even possible? lol

Hey, before all you ladies go bashing someone looking like that [pink polo dude] It's actually those sorts of people I seem to see the girls flock around.

WHAT'S wrong with those shoes?

They're annoying... I bet you own one of those!

How much?