And you may not think girls can do it but I think they can. I work in marketing and I see it every week. The ones that make it, like in every industry, are the ones that stick to it and adapt to what works and manage their brand. There's literally 1000's of examples of it, maybe 10'000's - not all are millionaires, but many can make a living without relying on creepy agents.
Which leads me on to what I was speaking about in the old model industry, that still exists but isn't the draw it once was: I'm describing what I saw and know to exist from the middle to upper tier models. Lower tier local models will get catalogue work and some other things, but what I am speaking is known as "fact". Seen with my own eyes and well publicised.
Model houses where agencies and models live , move, network throughout the year and they're paid and encouraged to date wealthy men connected to agencies. In some cases it's more straight forward. Some models are in it to get into those upper, upper tier social circles for life, knowing they'll be set. Just because you're oblivious to it doesn't mean it's not fact, there's a ton of instances in public view where what I am talking about is in public view. The fact that a rich man can point at a girl on the cover of a magazine or her instagram and often get a date with that girl now and 20 years ago - facts. Famous models ot lower end girls too, all depends on them , their agency, etc.
And yeah, you seem to be projecting all onlyfans girls are sex workers - look at the stats, they don't all do sex work and even professional athletes have onlyfans to raise funds - if you knew more about the world you'd know that's ACTUALLY what the platform was intended for.
So...you're projecting. Get offended. I am speaking facts, look it up. The platform has more non-porn profiles than porn profiles. YOU may be following only porn, but many are following SFW content on there too. Before you get enraged, I said "many", not "most" - porn is likely the most popular and makes the most money, but that doesn't mean that onlyfans creators doing non-porn work is non-existent
That said: Rachel cook is not a sex worker. She's a model/nude model. MANY OF girls use her model and , like models in the past, they run their accounts like a business but they avoid a middle man. She has a setup where her or a team she employs via her generated revenue make very consistent and varying content and she clearly has tested and changed to what works and what she's willing to do. She's never even kissed another person on camera, so calling it sex work it like calling someone driving for door dash a professional race car driver.
You clearly don't know about the back of house for the real modelling industry and porn industry, I'll tell you now - it's WAY better that these girls get to make their own choices rather than getting sucked into seedy spaces where they can be led astray and more. They get to focus on their look, promotion and working with who they want and they manage their own audience and engagement how they want - or at least they have the option to do that now . 10 years ago you didn't have that.
They also get more of the money for the work and don't have to make money where they don't see the revenues and sign a contract based on what a monopoly offered them. So, yea, I say good for them. They're not being bullied by shadowy figures into doing things the way a small , powerful minority wants them to do and I think that's a good thing. IF they're cover models or pornstars who take 100 dicks in a day - they girls have more power now and get more of the money.
