Posts posted by Cain
-
-
41 minutes ago, Frankfavaro3369 said:
The problem with her is everything is the same. Yes, she has an incredible body for bikinis. She'll never be a high end clothing model. This sort of is what it is. She's never gotten better. It's the same now as it was years ago.
This is absolute nonsense, and completely ignores a huge part of her portfolio with the Runway Goddess brand, among other non-swimsuit content she's done. Her future has nothing to do if she can be or not ... it has everything to do with if she wants to or not. She's on record saying she doesn't want to be a career model and wants to do something in the scientific field, and the modeling stuff is just getting her through her schooling.
-
-
-
On 1/27/2025 at 9:26 AM, BoobieLover23 said:
nope, wrong on both counts.. the "leak" of the first video the "shirt changing" as you called it was a $25 post you had to buy and it was leaked on every website besides Instagram and facebook.. the "boyfriend PDA" as you call it was also a Sunroom post and it was trash of a video but due to all of her content now being Instagram level dog shit, she doesnt care if it gets leaked bec she is making people pay a great deal of money for said dog shit postings
I can't tell if you're being deliberately misleading or are just this misinformed. I'm literally sitting here, on my phone, looking at the Sunroom post of her getting ready for work which includes the shirt changing with the curlers in her hair. So unless you are talking about a different shirt change, you are demonstrable wrong.
Even if it was kind of sort of "leaked", it was still on her Sunroom account without needing additional purchase, and it was edited for public consumption. The PDA video was meant to be private from the boyfriend.
I don't know where you are getting your information, but you continue to be way out in left field when it comes to Emily. Bad takes with bad opinions of someone you (and I) don't know and need to stop pretending to so you can make derogatory posts about her. If "MadiFans" was any kind of precedent on the Madi Teeuws page, you will know that kind of posting isn't tolerated here. Check your attitude and borderline misogynistic takes at the door in the future.
-
-
-
-
-
-
On 11/26/2024 at 8:08 AM, brnd said:
i think they have become a little more relaxed:
"Staff have agreed that as of right now Patreon/Only Fans content will BE allowed, however if we receive requests for removal, we will take down pictures as needed (...)."There was a point where posting Sunroom stuff consistently might have drawn attention, but now it's pretty much everywhere. It was arguably the most predictable result when you think about how much Sunroom boasted of their security.
in any case, she's on fire lately and I hope she keeps it up, on Sunroom and in general. Looking forward to seeing the anjuum stuff.
-
Thank you @zorzabosti a lot of good posts from you for her.
Do you post anywhere else for her or just on Bellazon?
-
-
4 minutes ago, Mohiam said:
You may have the wrong "Brooklyn Management". A quick search turns up https://brooklynmgmt.com.au/ the website for a Melbourne based modelling agency which has a page for Emily - https://brooklynmgmt.com.au/talent/emily-feld/
ah dang, you're right. I wanted to be excited that she was joining an american talent agency with hopes she's start doing more international stuff. Ah well, it went against the grain of what she's already signaled she was going to do. Thanks!
-
-
I took the wording of Prettyphile's post as "inappropriate behavior or discussions" not being separated from the rest of the post. The post gets a little confusing because the second sentence comes off as separate, but I don't think it was meant to be.
Instead you'll want to read it as: "Bellazon upholds a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to inappropriate behavior/discussions of younger models in the solicitation of information pertaining to their identity, inappropriate behavior/discussions when initiating threads centered around them, or inappropriate behavior/discussions in the dissemination of their images."
-
-
-
3 hours ago, brnd said:
Yea, Sunroom, at least the last two were. They were posted in March.
-
4 hours ago, Oldguy11 said:
no trigger discipline, cant be professional
likely couple to a few yr old,could csi the hair to date it better
the backlight on hair/arm in 2nd pic is difficult to accomplish with programming
It's fake until the OP tells us more about where they came from beyond "I just found this" *gestures vaguely*
-
-
4 hours ago, BoobieLover23 said:
clearly your dumbass doesnt know how to do math.. she said herself years before the clint shoot she was 11 then about 4 years (give or take 3 years 10 months) later she did the clint shoot, emily turned 19 this year you dumb fuck.. maybe go back to school and learn basic math i mean really everyone knows emily did that clint shoot in the summer of 2019.. and maybe you need me to teach your dumbass about basic math so lets do that then you ready?? emily said in December 12, 2016 that she was 11 years old, the clint shoot was after her birthday in 2019 which and she is 19 years old now in 2024... does that make since to your dumb ass little brain or to i have to teach you like a fucking baby on how to do basic math?
I genuinely don't think you're a troll and are just getting something wrong here, but you attitude and behavior is out of line and you're on a one way street to a ban if you keep it up.
The Clint shoot was posted (& removed) *on this thread on the first page* in March 2019, *before* she turned 14 in April 2019. That would make her 19 now, which I agree with. I don't think we are at odds on this point, you're just getting the timing of when the Clint shoot occured wrong. She was 13.
-
-
Let's take a step back at getting angry at each over to that extinct, @hwong ... The photo posted *was* fake. While I do agree with you that she continues to do risque sheer and form fitting, I believe @Franko is referencing the completely transparent gooseberry intimates top Clint put her in when she was 13, posted and removed on this thread on the first page. I'm not inclined to agree with Franko that the controversy from it will completely disincline her from doing transparent or bare in the future, but we've not seen her do anything as remotely that transparent since. Closest thing I can think of is a lacy blue bra she put up for sale on depop and immediately took down... though not fast enough for it's propagation on the Internet.
-
1 hour ago, BoobieLover23 said:
honestly anyone who has been a fan of her long enough knows about that "controversy" a few years back and the rumor that happened that has been backed to be true with a lawsuit she filed.. also just want to point out she didnt just turn 18.. she turned 19 this passed April.. she made her SunRoom account 2 weeks after her 18th
You're not wrong about the controversy being relatively well known, but as one of those long term fans the lawsuit you're mentioning is news to me. Is it public knowledge? Please don't post what the lawsuit was about if it isn't.
Emily Deyt-Aysage
in Female Fashion Models
That's a good one! ... and her smile at the end! 😍