
Posts posted by Franko
-
-
-
-
11 hours ago, LittleGorm said:
What is going on in the fashion world anyways? I have seen close to a thousand pix of Feld. where she is posed for a product line, e.g., swimsuits, her look is pretty much "Fuck off, all of you!!!". She has a beautiful smile. Her pix taken by friends at beaches she really looks fun and very nice. But her posed pix for various lines, she looks mean as hell. Jeesh, photographers, lighten up.
Photog's are contractors when it comes to shoots like that, they get told by the client what they want. Catalogue work in general is done "neutral" hence you rarely see a smile. That's more stuff for advertisements, lookbooks and more outdoorsy preview type stuff.
-
8 hours ago, Sunshiine said:
Whoever picks her outfits and attire needs to reevaluate things. I get that she got the blonde hair for the latest role but the clothes...like..uh. It feels really trying hard to get attention to put it nicely. -
-
On 2/13/2025 at 3:35 AM, Cult Icon said:
It's a shame- due to market conditions- that modeling can only be a part-time job for the vast majority now, and even those with careers it is brief..
Besides Rachel Cook, there are other established and once successful models (that I won't name here) that have turned to OF and become sex workers/strippers like her in order to make a living. I doubt any of them would do that if it didn't pay and certainly when they started modeling, in some cases as young as 15, they didn't envision that one day they have to become a sex worker.
So many models on BZ were simply born in the wrong era.
It's also an attitude and social issue. She could make a decent living modelling for swimwear, lingerie and catalogue stuff. She wouldn't make anywhere near as much money though. Adds to that, she seems...let's say immature on a level. The whole van life, then some kind of "community/commune" she was part of. Moving around, dipping out of the magazines she was part of, that doesn't give a professional vibe to any agency I imagine.
-
-
-
-
Am I the only one who feels like she should do more work for work that don't do the whole "fast fashion" stuff (And I'm already being charitable with that term). Like a lot of those attire looks like it's worn by women who work under street lamps in the evenings.
Like do Honey Birdette, Hunkemoller, Fleur de Mal, Agent Provocateur or something if you wanna show skin. -
18 hours ago, Benny_the_huntsman said:
I'm saying that is very normal behaviour for couples, especially at that age, and they likely weren't intending for the video to go public. I'm not sure what 'image' you're referring to? She posts half naked pics of herself online, and sells her intimate clothing. Her 'image' is likely something you've constructed based on fantasy as opposed to something she's actively worried about. She shouldn't be held to some higher standard based on what she does for a living, she should be able to be herself.
Just my humble opinion 🤷♂️
If you consider that normal, I'd look in the mirror if I were you. There is showing public affection or desire on camera, and there is groping your partners crotch while she's recording. But hey, maybe I was just raised different.
-
-
-
Neil Dixons IG. He's definitely taking some of the best pictures of her. I'm kinda wondering if she might end up doing implied nudity for Series mag at some point. She's local-ish to Natalie Roser, so it seems feasible. I don't see her showing full frontal, but I could see her doing implied nudity or maybe topless at some point.
-
-
38 minutes ago, hapsburg_mark said:
Man these dudes really love their shitty grain filters, huh? It's funny how cameras got more and more crisp and high res and what happens? Let's add noise to it, make it look like a picture taken on a 2005 phone camera. (appreciate the adds!)
-
5 hours ago, babranski said:
Let's take a step back at getting angry at each over to that extinct, @hwong ... The photo posted *was* fake. While I do agree with you that she continues to do risque sheer and form fitting, I believe @Franko is referencing the completely transparent gooseberry intimates top Clint put her in when she was 13, posted and removed on this thread on the first page. I'm not inclined to agree with Franko that the controversy from it will completely disincline her from doing transparent or bare in the future, but we've not seen her do anything as remotely that transparent since. Closest thing I can think of is a lacy blue bra she put up for sale on depop and immediately took down... though not fast enough for it's propagation on the Internet.
You're correct on all accounts. That's what I meant.
-
3 hours ago, babranski said:
You're not wrong about the controversy being relatively well known, but as one of those long term fans the lawsuit you're mentioning is news to me. Is it public knowledge? Please don't post what the lawsuit was about if it isn't.
Yeah, never heard anything about that either. new member, first post making those claims seems..well I'm pressing doubt there. I think if anything she wanted to keep it quiet and the photog also never made a statement to my knowledge.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nicola Cavanis
in Female Fashion Models
2 seconds of Google reveals: Lingerie brand.