Jump to content

bobbyjoel234

Members

  • Joined

  • Last visited

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by bobbyjoel234

    8 hours ago, JSNBourne said:

    I always thought Maggie wasn't a natural blonde and dyed her hair, but based on this photo I guess she is. Unless her mother started highlights at a very young age.

    502961243_18462170794076468_5119420643650477499_n.jpg

    She was always blonde in school growing up

    @JSNBourne cool! I grew up going to school with maggie in south Carolina (got yearbook photos for proof). Can confirm she's quite short. I wasn't close with her but she dated my friend Eddie for a bit in middle school. Its my one claim to fame hah. It's really cool to see how big her career has gotten

    11 hours ago, MadiFans said:

     

     

    Maggie isn't 30. That info online is horribly wrong.

    She's 29 or 30, I was in her grade at school as a kid and I'm 30.

    You are right that most of the online info is wrong though.

    7 hours ago, alexdebary said:

     

    They're sheer at best... 🤦‍♂️

    Looks like pure & classy ecomm pics.

     

    If you are what you claim than DM her and ask if this was agreed upon and than post the screenshot here.

     

    But I'll give you an out though, the site also has sheer pics and no use of nipple covers/pasties with other models as well so this was clearly communicated & agreed upon prior to the shoot.

     

     

    🤣

    That's not really that easy to do. I grew up with Maggie (we weren't close friends but she did date a friend of mine for a year in middle school) but when her personal Facebook turned into her public page I lost the ability to DM her since I don't use twitter/Instagram at all. Regardless, Ed just sounds upset that his imaginary version of Maggie isn't real. She's just a normal person and we'll likely never know the extent of pressure she faces every day in the industry to do more nude/risqué shoots. I don't think some sheer ecomm pics are anything to be upset over as a lingerie model.