The Political Correctness Haters' Club

[Sanni]

1 hour ago, frenchkiki said:

I see a big shit hole ^^

 

Are you getting any closeted gay male vibes from him? It could explain his impotent anger.

[frenchkiki]

If he was gay he would do a video about it.

"How Hillary Clinton & the socialists & the liberals & Obama put Kool-gayd in my water and make me a gay Muslim"

 

I really can't define his sexuality.

*shivers*

 

[Sanni]

Hah, lots of confused people here. Makes sense. Trump has dementia and his voters are demented.

 

I think the guy is so obsessed that alternatively he could have a porn addiction/think about fucking all the time or have no sex drive and obsesses about politics instead.

[frenchkiki]

Oh no!

[Sanni]

2 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

Oh no!

 

Don’t confuse them!

[Cult Icon]

20 hours ago, frenchkiki said:

I see a big shit hole ^^

 

 

Do you like Mel's mouth? 

[frenchkiki]

How can I not??

 

[Cult Icon]

^

hahaha

 

[frenchkiki]

 

[Cult Icon]

For Christy!!!    @frenchkiki

 

 

 

 

 

mmmm  Much pleasure!

 

[phenobarbie]

The irony here is you can't dispute any of the facts he's saying so you start to question his sexuality and bitch about his voice.

 

This is a thread basically for people who aren't politically correct, I.e for the most part arn't left leaning bigots who can't see beyond what the media shoves down your throat, and you are some of the biggest PC people on this forum. Honestly though half this thread is made up of PC people who do nothing but bash Trump and anyone who supports him. It's quite funny and a little depressing that you can't see just how fucking stupid it is.

[Kevork89]

I hate how the word racist is thrown around now. That’s my biggest issue with PC culture. I think people forget that racist people are people who actually hate a race. Saying something stereotypical is not racist. Saying another place is a shit hole is not racist. 

[ILUVAdrianaLima]

On 1/15/2018 at 11:43 AM, frenchkiki said:

I see a big shit hole ^^

 

A gay shit hole

[Cult Icon]

 

[phenobarbie]

1 hour ago, ILUVAdrianaLima said:

 

A gay shit hole

I rest my case. None of you can dispute the information provided so you focus on shit that has no relevance to the debate in question.

 

Maybe you should all start a thread  called the "Political Correctness Club" because you're not all haters of political correctness, you're all very firm advocates of it.

[ILUVAdrianaLima]

3 minutes ago, phenobarbie said:

I rest my case. None of you can dispute the information provided so you focus on shit that has no relevance to the debate in question.

 

Maybe you should all start a thread  called the "Political Correctness Club" because you're not all haters of political correctness, you're all very firm advocates of it.

 

Actually I just can't stand his voice I've hammered out his BS before but I won't waste my time here for that, people need to do their homework!

[elfstone]

Excellent interview. Its about time that the exponents of this whole "Russiagate" conspiracy theory got called out for their nonsense

[Sanni]

7 hours ago, phenobarbie said:

The irony here is you can't dispute any of the facts he's saying so you start to question his sexuality and bitch about his voice.

 

Wrong conclusion but it makes sense since you are “confused.”

 

8 hours ago, phenobarbie said:

This is a thread basically for people who aren't politically correct, I.e for the most part arn't left leaning bigots who can't see beyond what the media shoves down your throat, and you are some of the biggest PC people on this forum. Honestly though half this thread is made up of PC people who do nothing but bash Trump and anyone who supports him. It's quite funny and a little depressing that you can't see just how fucking stupid it is.

 

Hmm, is it PC to stay out of “The Political Correctness Haters' Club” thread?

[elfstone]

The Same Democrats Who Denounce Donald Trump as a Lawless, Treasonous Authoritarian Just Voted to Give Him Vast Warrantless Spying Powers

Quote

Leading the charge against reforms of the FBI’s domestic spying powers was Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee who, in countless TV appearances, has strongly insinuated, if not outright stated, that Trump is controlled by and loyal to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

 

https://theintercept.com/2018/01/12/the-same-democrats-who-denounce-trump-as-a-lawless-treasonous-authoritarian-just-voted-to-give-him-vast-warrantless-spying-powers/

 

Quote

Leading congressional Democrats have spent the last year relentlessly accusing Donald Trump of being controlled by or treasonously loyal to a hostile foreign power. Over the last several months, they have added to those disloyalty charges a new set of alleged crimes: abusing the powers of the executive branch — including the Justice Department and FBI — to vindictively punish political opponents while corruptly protecting the serious crimes of his allies, including his own family members and possibly himself.

The inescapable conclusion from all of this, they have relentlessly insisted, is that Trump is a lawless authoritarian of the type the U.S. has not seen in the Oval Office for decades, if ever: a leader who has no regard for constitutional values or legal limits and thus, poses a grave, unique, and existential threat to the institutions of American democracy. Reflecting the severity of these fears, the anti-Trump opposition movement that has coalesced within Democratic Party politics has appropriated a slogan — expressed in the hashtag form of contemporary online activism — that was historically used by those who unite, at all costs, to defeat domestic tyranny: #Resistance.

One would hope, and expect, that those who genuinely view Trump as a menace of this magnitude and view themselves as #Resistance fighters would do everything within their ability to impose as many limits and safeguards as possible on the powers he is able to wield. If “resistance” means anything, at a minimum it should entail a refusal to trust a dangerous authoritarian to wield vast power with little checks or oversight.

Yesterday in Washington, congressional Democrats were presented with a critical opportunity to do exactly that. A proposed new amendment was scheduled to be voted on in the House of Representatives that would have imposed meaningful limits and new safeguards on Trump’s ability to exercise one of the most dangerous, invasive, and historically abused presidential powers: spying on the communications of American citizens without warrants. Yesterday’s amendment was designed to limit the powers first enacted during the Bush years to legalize the Bush/Cheney domestic warrantless eavesdropping program. The Intercept’s Alex Emmons on Wednesday detailed the history and substance of the various bills pending in the House.

Although the Trump White House and a majority of House Republicans (including House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes) favored extension (and even an expansion) of the current law’s spying powers and opposed any real reforms, a substantial minority of GOP lawmakers have long opposed warrantless surveillance of Americans and thus, announced their intention to support new safeguards. Indeed, the primary sponsor and advocate of the amendment to provide new domestic spying safeguards was the conservative Republican from Michigan, Justin Amash, who, in the wake of the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations, worked in close partnership with liberal Democratic Rep. John Conyers to try to rein in some of these domestic spying powers.

Despite opposition from GOP House leadership and the Trump White House, Amash was able to secure the commitment of dozens of House Republicans to support his amendments to limit the ability of Trump’s FBI to spy on Americans without warrants. The key provision of his amendment would have required that the FBI first obtain a warrant before being permitted to search and read through the communications of Americans collected by the National Security Agency.

To secure enactment of these safeguards, Amash needed support from a majority of House Democrats. That meant that House Democrats held the power in their hands to decide whether Trump — the president they have been vocally vilifying as a lawless tyrant threatening American democracy — would be subjected to serious limits and safeguards on how his FBI could spy on the conversations of American citizens.

Debate on the bill and the amendments began on the House floor yesterday afternoon, and it became quickly apparent that leading Democrats intended to side with Trump and against those within their own party who favored imposing safeguards on the Trump administration’s ability to engage in domestic surveillance. The most bizarre aspect of this spectacle was that the Democrats who most aggressively defended Trump’s version of the surveillance bill — the Democrats most eager to preserve Trump’s spying powers as virtually limitless — were the very same Democratic House members who have become media stars this year by flamboyantly denouncing Trump as a treasonous, lawless despot in front of every television camera they could find.

Leading the charge against reforms of the FBI’s domestic spying powers was Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee who, in countless TV appearances, has strongly insinuated, if not outright stated, that Trump is controlled by and loyal to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Indeed, just this weekend, in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Schiff accused Trump of corruptly abusing the powers of the DOJ and FBI in order to vindictively punish Hilary Clinton and other political enemies. Referring to Trump’s various corrupt acts, Schiff pronounced: “We ought to be thinking in Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, beyond these three years what damage may be done to the institutions of our democracy. ”

Yet just two days later, there was the very same Adam Schiff, on the House floor, dismissing the need for real safeguards on the ability of Trump’s FBI to spy on Americans. In demanding rejection of the warrant requirement safeguard, Schiff channeled Dick Cheney — and the Trump White House — in warning that any warrant requirements would constitute “a crippling requirement in national security and terrorism cases.”

Standing with Schiff in opposing these safeguards was his fellow California Democrat Eric Swalwell, who has devoted his entire congressional term almost exclusively to accusing Trump of being a puppet of the Kremlin, in the process becoming a media darling among the MSNBC set and online #Resistance movement. Yet after spending a full year warning that Trump’s real loyalty was to Moscow rather than America, Swalwell echoed Schiff in demanding that no warrant safeguards were needed on the spying power of Trump’s FBI.

If one were to invoke the standard mentality and tactics of Schiff and Swalwell — namely, impugning the patriotism and loyalty of anyone questioning their Trump/Russia accusations — one could seriously question their own patriotism in handing these vast, virtually unlimited spying powers to a president whom they say they believe is a corrupt agent of a foreign power.