Jump to content
Bellazon

Trumpland U.S.A


Cult Icon

Recommended Posts

^

Quote

Does Wikileaks have more examples of the U.S. government tapping the conversations of German Chancellor Angela Merkel?

The government accountability group teased the possibility this afternoon.

“Terrified talk in US national security circles that WikiLeaks is going to publish many CIA or NSA intercepts of Merkel tonight or tomorrow,” Wikileaks tweeted on Monday.

 

Previously, Wikileaks released “highly classified documents showing that the US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin.”

Intercepts of Merkel would only be the latest in a long line of examples of the U.S. government eavesdropping on world leaders.

 

Last year, Wikileaks published a long list of other examples, including:

“Back in 2010 we revealed that the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered her diplomats to steal the UN leadership’s biometric data and other information,” Wikileaks editor Julian Assange said last year.

“The US government has signed agreements with the UN that it will not engage in such conduct. It will be interesting to see the UN’s reaction, because if the United Nations Secretary General, whose communications and person have legal inviolability, can be repeatedly attacked without consequence then everyone is at risk.”

 

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/wikileaks-release-cia-nsa-intercepts-merkel/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bilery's henchman turned to the dark side

 

Quote

Beyond the Clintons themselves, there is also the troubling case of one of their closest aides, John Podesta. He served as Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman. Podesta didn’t just have conversations with Russian officials. He went into business with the Russian government while he was advising Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.

In 2011, John Podesta joined the executive board of a small energy company called Joule Unlimited.  Two months after he joined the board, the Russian government invested one billion rubles (approximately $35 million) into the company. The money came from a Russian government investment fund called Rusnano. What is Rusnano? It is a fund started in 2007 by Vladimir Putin and has been described by Russian Education and Science Minister Andrei Fursenko as “Putin’s Child.”

 

According to State Department cables leaked via Wikileaks, technology venture funds like Rusnano were considered a national security concern by U.S. officials because they could serve a “dual use” in their investments. That is, their investments in civilian technologies could have a military application.

In short, John Podesta was business partners with the Russian government and Vladimir Putin.  When John Podesta went to the White House in January 2014 to serve as counselor to President Obama, he failed to disclose his board membership in one of the Joule entities on his financial disclosure form. According to the Podesta emails, Podesta transferred his 75,000 shares in the company to an LLC controlled by his family. But as the Wall Street Journal notes, the Podesta emails reveal he remained actively engaged in company business after that fact.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/03/peter-schweizer-trump-vs-clintons-russia-ties-guess-who-always-got-free-pass.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PinkCouture said:

^ I saw that a few days ago and I was like "WTF is this shit she is pulling out her ass now!?" :ermm:  :rofl: I think it is so innate she doesn't realize she is doing and it bypasses her brain :PinkCouture2: On a similar topic, since Shepard Smith came out he has been liberated and on FIRE!!! :chicken: He better watch his back b/c you know Donnie is gunning for him. Also, the fact he is gay, and you know how the administration feels about gay people, Sheppy has a double target on him:ninjaknives:I guess he could go to MSNBC/NBC like all the other Fox News rejects or CNN (he has been kissing their asses :laugh: )

 

The best part starts at 1:27. The fact he has so much botox in his face and he can't show much expression makes it even more hilarious :rofl: 

 

 

 

"Microwaves do no turn into cameras! Fox news can now confirm: microwaves heat food, cameras take pictures, microphones dont have cameras...and microphones cannot turn into cameras...Fox news now confirms!" - Shepard Smith - (Fox News) :rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

The above quote from Shep had me in stitches! With each passing month, more and more anchors have no choice but to point out the ludicrous lies and distorted information the Trump administration keeps spewing out. ANY individual with one grain of common sense knows you just can't keep lying Conway/Trumpy style and think all is going to be peachy. I give Shep a few months to a year before he defects to CNN or another news network that shifts more to the left or as some would say...a tad MORE honest :p At this rate, Fox News will be just Fox & Friends, Hannity, and good ol' angry "get off my lawn" O'Reilly at the helm :ninja:  Suck on that journalism!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darth Putin converted the Klingons

 

Quote

... those pushing the narrative of troubling ties to Russia lose all credibility by wholly ignoring the far deeper and more troubling relationships the Clintons and their closest aides have maintained with Russian government officials for years, including while they were in public office. Unlike the revelations so far concerning Russian ties in the Trump camp, the Clinton deals involved hundreds of millions of dollars and enormous favors that benefitted Russian interests.

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton received large sums of money directly and indirectly from Russian officials while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.  Bill Clinton was paid a cool $500,000 (well above his normal fee) for a speech in Moscow in 2010.  Who footed the bill?  An investment firm in Moscow called Renaissance Capital, which boasts deep ties to Russian intelligence.  The Clinton Foundation itself took money from Russian officials and Putin-connected oligarchs.  They also took donations from:

  • Viktor Vekselberg, a Putin confidant who gave through his company, Renova Group
  •  Andrey Vavilov, a former Russian government official who was Chairman of SuperOx, a research company that was part of the “nuclear Cluster” at the Russian government’s Skolkovo research facility
  •  Elena Baturina, the wife of the former Mayor of Moscow, who apparently gave them money through JSC Inteco, an entity that she controls

Then there is the glaring fact that the Clinton Foundation also scored $145 million in donations from nine shareholders in a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One that was sold to the Russian government in 2010. The deal required the approval of several federal government agencies, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, to buy assets that amounted to 20 percent of American uranium.  Rosatom, by the way controls the Russian nuclear arsenal.

 

Equally troubling: some of those donations were hidden and not disclosed by the Clintons. President Obama required the Clinton Foundation to disclose all contributions as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming Secretary of State. But that did not happen. The only reason the hidden donations ever came to light is because we uncovered them by combing through Canadian tax records.

 

Everyone got what they wanted in this deal: the uranium investors made a nice profit; the Russians acquired a strategic asset; and the Clinton Foundation bagged a lot of money.

 

Hillary Clinton says she was not involved in the decision to approve the sale of Uranium One.  As proof, the Clinton campaign in 2015 trotted out her former aide, Assistant Secretary of State Fernandez, to say publicly that we should take his word for it that she was not involved in approving that deal. But as we now know from the leaked Podesta emails, Fernandez was all too eager to help Podesta kill the story, while getting other favors from Podesta.  That raises questions about the veracity of his comments.

 

It seems strange that while some in Congress are eager to investigate the activities of General Mike Flynn and his contacts with Russia, they have no interest in looking into a transaction in which the Clinton Foundation received a staggering $145 million. It’s that kind of inconsistency that saps all credibility from those raising these issues.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/03/peter-schweizer-trump-vs-clintons-russia-ties-guess-who-always-got-free-pass.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...